Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON SERVICE TAX CREDIT TO BE CARRIED FORWARD IN GST REGIME

GST UPDATE ON SERVICE TAX CREDIT TO BE CARRIED FORWARD IN GST REGIME
 
GST UPDATE ON SERVICE TAX CREDIT TO BE CARRIED FORWARD IN GST REGIME
 
Every registered person under GST who wants to take transitional credits as per transitional provisions is required to fill TRAN-1 within 90 days from appointed day i.e. 28th September, 2017, which has been extended till 31st October, 2017. The pre-requisite to file TRAN-1 was that such credits can be availed only if registered person has filled all the returns for preceding six months required under existing laws, otherwise he is not eligible to claim transitional credit. Balance amount which was carried forward in last return is an eligible credit under GST regime.
 
Circular no. 207/5/2017-Service Tax dated 28th September, 2017 had been issued to clarify regarding admissibility of credit on services covered under reverse charge for the month of June, 2017. It is worthwhile to mention here that the last date of payment of service tax under reverse charge for the month of June, 2017 was 5th/6th July, 2017 and credit is admissible if following conditions are satisfied:
 
·        The services should have been received up to 30/06/2017.
·        The payment for value of invoice raised in respect of these services should also have been made up to 30/06/2017.
·        The service tax on these services should have been paid after 1st July but before 5th/6th July, 2017.
 
For making such assessee carry forward their credit, due date for filing return has also been extended so that such credit can be availed through revised return. This circular has been beneficial to a lot of assessee who wanted to take this credit but could not due to lack of clarity.
 
As per the circular, credit on services covered under reverse charge can be availed if payment is made on 5th /6th July, 2017 for the month of June, 2017 by considering that such payment of service tax was done in the month of June itself. Now, according to Rule 4(7) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the CENVAT credit in respect of input service shall be allowed on or after the day on which the invoice, bill or as the case may be, challan referred to in Rule 9 is received. Thus, according to this rule credit on these services can be availed only after making payment of tax which is made after 1st July but before or on 5th/6th July. There could be litigation on the matter that since service tax had not been paid on 30.06.2017, credit cannot be availed as on 30.06.2017.
 
It was held in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara Vs Dhiren Chemical Industries [2002 (139) ELT 3 (SC)], that board circulars are binding on the departmental officers and they cannot contest or challenge the contents of the circular. However, there is another Supreme Court decision given in the case of CCE, Bolpur Vs M/s Ratan Melting & Wire Industries [2008-TIOL-194-SC-CX-LB] which states that if the circular is contrary to the statutory provisions, the revenue authorities have the right to challenge the said circular and contest them.
 
In view of the above decisions, the circulars which are contrary to existing legal provisions are not sustainable. In instant case, circular cannot override statutory provision i.e. CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Thus, in such cases it is more likely that the department may take shed of the decision given in the case of CCE, Bolpur Vs M/s Ratan Melting & Wire Industries [2008-TIOL-194-SC-CX-LB]  to prove that the circular so issued is against the existing legal provisions.
 
 
You can follow us at www.capradeepjain.comor at our face book page at http://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
 
Your Need Our Concern…
 
Thanking you,
 
Regards,
           
Pradeep Jain, F.C.A.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com