Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON SERVICE TAX CREDIT TO BE CARRIED FORWARD IN GST REGIME

GST UPDATE ON SERVICE TAX CREDIT TO BE CARRIED FORWARD IN GST REGIME
 
GST UPDATE ON SERVICE TAX CREDIT TO BE CARRIED FORWARD IN GST REGIME
 
Every registered person under GST who wants to take transitional credits as per transitional provisions is required to fill TRAN-1 within 90 days from appointed day i.e. 28th September, 2017, which has been extended till 31st October, 2017. The pre-requisite to file TRAN-1 was that such credits can be availed only if registered person has filled all the returns for preceding six months required under existing laws, otherwise he is not eligible to claim transitional credit. Balance amount which was carried forward in last return is an eligible credit under GST regime.
 
Circular no. 207/5/2017-Service Tax dated 28th September, 2017 had been issued to clarify regarding admissibility of credit on services covered under reverse charge for the month of June, 2017. It is worthwhile to mention here that the last date of payment of service tax under reverse charge for the month of June, 2017 was 5th/6th July, 2017 and credit is admissible if following conditions are satisfied:
 
·        The services should have been received up to 30/06/2017.
·        The payment for value of invoice raised in respect of these services should also have been made up to 30/06/2017.
·        The service tax on these services should have been paid after 1st July but before 5th/6th July, 2017.
 
For making such assessee carry forward their credit, due date for filing return has also been extended so that such credit can be availed through revised return. This circular has been beneficial to a lot of assessee who wanted to take this credit but could not due to lack of clarity.
 
As per the circular, credit on services covered under reverse charge can be availed if payment is made on 5th /6th July, 2017 for the month of June, 2017 by considering that such payment of service tax was done in the month of June itself. Now, according to Rule 4(7) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the CENVAT credit in respect of input service shall be allowed on or after the day on which the invoice, bill or as the case may be, challan referred to in Rule 9 is received. Thus, according to this rule credit on these services can be availed only after making payment of tax which is made after 1st July but before or on 5th/6th July. There could be litigation on the matter that since service tax had not been paid on 30.06.2017, credit cannot be availed as on 30.06.2017.
 
It was held in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara Vs Dhiren Chemical Industries [2002 (139) ELT 3 (SC)], that board circulars are binding on the departmental officers and they cannot contest or challenge the contents of the circular. However, there is another Supreme Court decision given in the case of CCE, Bolpur Vs M/s Ratan Melting & Wire Industries [2008-TIOL-194-SC-CX-LB] which states that if the circular is contrary to the statutory provisions, the revenue authorities have the right to challenge the said circular and contest them.
 
In view of the above decisions, the circulars which are contrary to existing legal provisions are not sustainable. In instant case, circular cannot override statutory provision i.e. CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Thus, in such cases it is more likely that the department may take shed of the decision given in the case of CCE, Bolpur Vs M/s Ratan Melting & Wire Industries [2008-TIOL-194-SC-CX-LB]  to prove that the circular so issued is against the existing legal provisions.
 
 
You can follow us at www.capradeepjain.comor at our face book page at http://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
 
Your Need Our Concern…
 
Thanking you,
 
Regards,
           
Pradeep Jain, F.C.A.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com