Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Restrictions on availment of ITC

GST Update on Restrictions on availment of ITC
Restrictions on availment of ITC
 
We have already informed you about the restriction of 20% on taking of credit. We are discussing in depth about this provision. Following new sub-rule (4) has been inserted in Rule 36 dealing with conditions for claiming input tax credit:
 
“(4) Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37, shall not exceed 20 percent of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37.”
 
Hence the above inserted sub-rule provides that the availment of ITC with respect to the invoices or debit notes not uploaded by the supplier cannot exceed 20% of the eligible credit in respect of invoices or debit notes which have been uploaded.
 
Let us understand this with the help of an example. Suppose Mr. A registered person is a registered person in GST era.
(a) ITC reflected in GSTR 2A in October 2019 Rs. 1,00,000
(a)1 Ineligible Credit as per 2A out of (a) above Rs. 20,000
(a)2 Therefore, Eligible Credit i.e. (a)-(a)1 Rs.80,000
(b) ITC as per books of accounts Rs.1,50,000
     
  Provisional ITC (20% of the limit) that can be claimed =20%*80000= Rs.16,000
(c) Total ITC eligible for availment in 3B return =80,000+16,000
=Rs.96,000
(d) Credit to be transferred in unclaimed account in books of accounts =80%*80,000=Rs.64,000
 
ITC will be restricted for buyers if suppliers have not uploaded invoice and paid tax. Buyers will be able to claim only 20% provisional ITC. Provisional ITC will be a maximum of 20% of the ITC available as per GSTR-2A i.e. 20% of ITC for invoices that have been uploaded by suppliers.
 
The inserted rule does not elaborate the term eligible credit. However, depth analysis of the term depicts that eligible credit is the total credit reflected in the GSTR 2A for a particular period or month. However, this credit excludes ineligible credit as per Section 17(5), credit pertaining to exempt supplies, reverse charge supplies reflecting in 2A return etc.
 
However, the credit to be taken cannot be exactly 20%, it has to be based on the invoices only. You can maximize your credit by doing various permutation and combination of invoices but it will be nearest to 20%. Supposing in above example, 20% comes to 1,19,200/- then you should avail so and rest of the invoices cannot be availed.
 
Moreover, credits which cannot be availed due to 20% restriction are supposedly to be debited in unclaimed ledgers in our books of accounts rather than directly posting in Input ledgers.
The entry would be as follows-
Purchases a/c Dr……
Unclaimed Input CGST a/c Dr….
Unclaimed Input SGST a/c Dr….
          To Sundry Creditors a/c………
Or else at the end of the month, you can pass the entry and transfer from Input SGST and Input CSGT to unclaimed credit account. Now, it is not clear that 20 percent will be applicable for each account of CGST, SGST and IGST separately or overall restriction will be applicable. If overall restriction is applied then everyone will take 20 percent IGST credit which can be utilized in payment of any account.
 
Every month while reconciling GSTR 2A with the books of accounts, the excess credit remaining after availing 20% credit will be transferred to Unclaimed input ledgers.
 
There are certainly many more practical difficulties which will be faced by the assessee while complying with the inserted rule. Now continue with the same example, suppose, the next month figures are as under:-
 
(a) ITC reflected in GSTR 2A in November 2019 Rs. 2,00,000
(a)1 Ineligible Credit as per 2A out of (a) above Rs. 50,000
(a)2 Therefore, Eligible Credit i.e. (a)-(a)1 Rs.1,50,000
(b) ITC as per books of accounts Rs.2,50,000
     
 
 
The issue under consideration is basically with the calculation of eligible credit for each period and maintenance of accounts.
 
The major questions arises –
While matching GSTR 2A of the next month, some of the invoices of previous month is uploaded. invoices pertaining to Rs. 50,000 of the previous month are uploaded by the supplier. This includes some credit which has been considered in 20% limit and credit has been availed instantly in October 2019. Out of Rs. 50,000 uploaded of previous month, 30000 credit is pertaining unclaimed credit and 20,000 to claimed invoices of previous month. Now the problem comes up with the calculation of eligible ITC for the November 2019 month.
 
There are different schools of thoughts for calculating eligible credits.
(1) Technically, Eligible credit for the month of Nov 19= invoices which were unclaimed last month uploaded in GSTR2A in this month (30,000 in example)+ eligible credit reflected in 2A of Nov19
(2) However some experts are of view that the calculation should include absolute figure of Rs. 50,000 for the purpose of eligible credit. But the credit of 20,000 is already taken. However, this school says that 20,000 was never considered for 20 % limit although these are now uploaded in GSTR-2A.
 
If accumulated credit is taken for calculating eligible credits, then assessee has to devote his day and night in matching GSTR 2A of all the previous months which is a very tedious task and never ending exercise. The assesse was not able to do it on annual basis but whether they can do it on monthly basis and that too in a limited time.
 
All GSTR-1 will be uploaded on 11th, hence GSTR-2A will probably come on 15th for all assessees. Then they have to reconcile the same for all earlier months within 5 days and then file the returns.
 
In addition to this, how the assessee will do accounting entries relating to input tax credit which are ineligible due to 20% limit but eligible as per GST law that too month wise in their books of accounts. Maintenance of accounts as per this rule will be an impossible task for the accountants.
Another implication of this amendment is for small providers who file quarterly returns. Their credit will be available to purchaser on quarterly basis. But that will not be acceptable to large units. They will not trade with small assesees. Hence, they will be compelled to opt for monthly returns.
 
It does not seem to be practically possible to implement this situation. The views and suggestions from all netizens are invited on this burning issue.
 
The content of this GST update is for educational purpose only and not intended for solicitation.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com