Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON REPORTING OF CREDIT NOTES AND AMENDMENTS IN GSTR-9

GST UPDATE ON REPORTING OF CREDIT NOTES AND AMENDMENTS IN GSTR-9
In the earlier update we have discussed the issues regarding the bifurcation of the credit availed in the GSTR 3B in the categories inputs, input services and capital goods. This update intends to highlight issues related to credit notes and reporting of amendments in GSTR-9.
4I in GSTR 9 contains details of credit notes issued in respect of outward supplies in 4B to 4E of GSTR 9 which is briefly described as follows-
4B- Supplies made to unregistered persons(B2B)
4C- Zero rated Supply(Export) on payment of tax(except supplies to SEZs)
4D- Supply to SEZs on payment of tax
4E- Deemed Exports
Reporting under credit notes issued for outward supplies made (4I) consists of only those which are reported in Table 9B of the GSTR 1 for the financial year 2017-18. Any reporting made subsequently in 2018-19 even in respect of period July- March 2018 are not to be considered here for reporting in table 4I.
Any amendments made in the debit and credit notes itself in the same financial year will be shown under the table 4K/4L- Supplies/ Tax declared through Amendments. However, it must be noted that only net effects of the amendments needs to be captured i.e. the incremental or differential value. If the entire revised value of invoice is disclosed in the amendment table, it will result in duplication of data thereby leading to incorrect results.
Another important point to be noted is that there is separate Part V for reporting transactions of financial year 2017-18 which are declared in returns filed for the period from April, 2018 to September, 2018. Table 10 and Table 11 of GSTR 9, reflects the supplies/tax declared or reduced through amendments. The point for consideration is that whether omission of transaction is to be treated as amendment or not? Say for example, if a sales invoice pertaining to the month of February, 2018 was omitted to be reported in GSTR-1 for February, 2018 and was later reported in the return filed for the month of May, 2018. In such case, the supplies, even if declared first time are to be reported in table 10 of GSTR-9. Although, the serial no. 10 of GSTR-9 mentions supplies declared through amendments but since there is no other specific serial no. wherein such supplies can be reported, the omissions are also to be reported in serial no. 10 of GSTR-9 itself.

The reporting of credit notes and their amendments is illustrated with the help of an example. Supplies were made to registered person amounting to Rs. 1,00,000 in the month of July, 2017. A credit note was issued against this invoice amounting Rs. 20,000 and was reported in August, 2017. However, the correct value of credit note was reflected in GSTR-1 of March, 2018 with Rs. 30000.
Now, the credit note worth Rs. 20,000 is to be shown in the table 4I under GSTR 9. The differential amount i.e.(30000-20000)= 10000 is to be shown under table 4L in GSTR 9.
In the same example, if the correct value of credit note was reflected in GSTR-1 of April, 2018, then in such case, since the revision was carried in the period April, 2018 to September, 2018, the same would be reported in Table 11 of annual return.
One more issue that is haunting the minds of the assessees is reporting of credit notes issued against nil rated, exempted and Non GST supplies. These credit notes are to be duly reported under table 5H table in annual return. However, GSTR 1 does not give facility to report such type of transactions in online as well as offline mode as such credit notes do not impact GST liability. These credit notes are in the nature of financial credit notes and are not reported in GSTR-1. Therefore, clarification should be issued as regards reporting such credit notes in the table 5H of return.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com