Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON REPORTING OF CREDIT NOTES AND AMENDMENTS IN GSTR-9

GST UPDATE ON REPORTING OF CREDIT NOTES AND AMENDMENTS IN GSTR-9
In the earlier update we have discussed the issues regarding the bifurcation of the credit availed in the GSTR 3B in the categories inputs, input services and capital goods. This update intends to highlight issues related to credit notes and reporting of amendments in GSTR-9.
4I in GSTR 9 contains details of credit notes issued in respect of outward supplies in 4B to 4E of GSTR 9 which is briefly described as follows-
4B- Supplies made to unregistered persons(B2B)
4C- Zero rated Supply(Export) on payment of tax(except supplies to SEZs)
4D- Supply to SEZs on payment of tax
4E- Deemed Exports
Reporting under credit notes issued for outward supplies made (4I) consists of only those which are reported in Table 9B of the GSTR 1 for the financial year 2017-18. Any reporting made subsequently in 2018-19 even in respect of period July- March 2018 are not to be considered here for reporting in table 4I.
Any amendments made in the debit and credit notes itself in the same financial year will be shown under the table 4K/4L- Supplies/ Tax declared through Amendments. However, it must be noted that only net effects of the amendments needs to be captured i.e. the incremental or differential value. If the entire revised value of invoice is disclosed in the amendment table, it will result in duplication of data thereby leading to incorrect results.
Another important point to be noted is that there is separate Part V for reporting transactions of financial year 2017-18 which are declared in returns filed for the period from April, 2018 to September, 2018. Table 10 and Table 11 of GSTR 9, reflects the supplies/tax declared or reduced through amendments. The point for consideration is that whether omission of transaction is to be treated as amendment or not? Say for example, if a sales invoice pertaining to the month of February, 2018 was omitted to be reported in GSTR-1 for February, 2018 and was later reported in the return filed for the month of May, 2018. In such case, the supplies, even if declared first time are to be reported in table 10 of GSTR-9. Although, the serial no. 10 of GSTR-9 mentions supplies declared through amendments but since there is no other specific serial no. wherein such supplies can be reported, the omissions are also to be reported in serial no. 10 of GSTR-9 itself.

The reporting of credit notes and their amendments is illustrated with the help of an example. Supplies were made to registered person amounting to Rs. 1,00,000 in the month of July, 2017. A credit note was issued against this invoice amounting Rs. 20,000 and was reported in August, 2017. However, the correct value of credit note was reflected in GSTR-1 of March, 2018 with Rs. 30000.
Now, the credit note worth Rs. 20,000 is to be shown in the table 4I under GSTR 9. The differential amount i.e.(30000-20000)= 10000 is to be shown under table 4L in GSTR 9.
In the same example, if the correct value of credit note was reflected in GSTR-1 of April, 2018, then in such case, since the revision was carried in the period April, 2018 to September, 2018, the same would be reported in Table 11 of annual return.
One more issue that is haunting the minds of the assessees is reporting of credit notes issued against nil rated, exempted and Non GST supplies. These credit notes are to be duly reported under table 5H table in annual return. However, GSTR 1 does not give facility to report such type of transactions in online as well as offline mode as such credit notes do not impact GST liability. These credit notes are in the nature of financial credit notes and are not reported in GSTR-1. Therefore, clarification should be issued as regards reporting such credit notes in the table 5H of return.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com