Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on relaxations given by government - 005/2020-21

GST Update on relaxations given by government - 005/2020-21
GST Update on relaxations given by government
On 3rd April 2020, a series of notifications and a circular have been issued notifying the effect of relaxations given by government announced in press Release amid the pandemic spread due to COVID-19. In this update, we shall discuss the relaxation given in the most concerned matter of filing returns that is GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for taxpayers.
Notification No. 33/2020-Central tax dated 3rd April, 2020 has being issued waiving the late fees payable for the periods March 2020, April 2020 and May 2020 and for the quarter ending 31st March 2020 for those who fail to furnish the details of outward supplies in GSTR-1 by due datebut furnishes such details on or before 30th June 2020.
Though relaxation has been given on waiver of late fees on filing of return subject to the condition mentioned above, but taxpayers shall be keen on filing GSTR-1 timely on or before the due dates. This is due to the fact that the receiver delays the supplier’s payment until it is not reflected in his GSTR-2A due to the limit for availing credit prescribed in Rule 36(4). He releases the payment of supplier only when it is reflected in his GSTR-2A. Hence, the supplier is compelled to file it by due date. Furthermore, provision of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules has been deferred and it is to be seen on cumulative basis but still the credit will be allowed on showing in GSTR-2A only. A separate update on this amendment in provision of Rule 36(4) is being sent to you. Hence, taxpayers will be filing GSTR-2A at the earliest and there is no payment of tax attached to it.
Further notification 31/2020- Central tax and 32/2020-Central Tax have been issued notifying the reduced rate of interest and waiver of late fees for filing GSTR-3B. This is done by way of inserting proviso. We have explained this provisions in separate update as well as hindi update.
 
Circular No. 136/06/2020-GST dated 3rd April 2020 has clearly mentioned that the due dates for the periods February, march and April 2020 has not been extended. Though the government has given relaxation to rate of interest in the case of GSTR-3B and late fees in the case of both GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B but yet these are subject to fulfilment of conditions as mentioned in our another update. Let us take a few scenarios which are to be faced practically by the taxpayers
Senerio 1: Where entire output liability is paid by way of credit
Mr. A having turnover more than Rs.  Crores is a taxpayer whose entire output tax liability is to be offset by using credit. Though on satisfying the above conditions for relaxation in interest rate yet the interest is to be paid by A on the gross tax liability. This is because the announcement made via press release of retrospective applicability of interest on net tax liability has not been made applicable. So this will again force the taxpayers to file the returns on or before the due dates as we are all aware of the difficulty being faced due to this. Moreover, the delay in filing of return by one day i.e. from June 24 to June 25 will force him to pay huge interest from beginning at higher rate also. This might be due to technical problem of portal. Hence, he will wish to file the return on due date.
Senerio 2: Where there arises a tax liability in cash, payment is made before the due date but return is filed on or before the dates prescribed above
Mr X having turnover above Rs. 5 Crore has made payment for the period of March 2020 before the due date on 20th April 2020 but due to some reasons he filed the return on 24th June 2020. In this situation he shall be liable to pay interest @ 9% from 6th may 2020 as interest is waived for the first 15 days from the due date. This is due to the reason that the portal calculates interest liability from the date when the return is filed. Even the payment is deemed as made by the department only when it is offset in the return. Deposit of cash in electronic cash ledger is not payment. The tax is offset only when the return is filed. Hence, everyone will wish to file the return on due date at least those assessee who have turnover more than Rs.  Crore.
Government needs to look into these matters as well because instead of the act, rules and notifications portal is being superseded.
 
 This is solely for educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com