Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON RELAXATION WITH RESPECT TO RULE 36(4) OF CGST RULES, 2017 - 004/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON RELAXATION WITH RESPECT TO RULE 36(4) OF CGST RULES, 2017 - 004/2020-21
GST UPDATE ON RELAXATION WITH RESPECT TO RULE 36(4) OF CGST RULES, 2017
The introduction of the provision restricting the input tax credit availment vis a vis invoices not reflected in GSTR-2A to the extent of 10% of the invoices reflected in GSTR-2A under Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 was resisted by the trade and industry as it substantially had an adverse on the working capital requirements of the business. The taxpayers were forced to discharge their GST liability in cash inspite of possession of valid invoices for the sole reason that the suppliers failed to comply with the filing of GSTR-1 within stipulated time. As we all know that the entire world is witnessing the rigours of pandemic COVID-19, it was represented by the trade and industry that the provision restricting input tax credit under Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 should be suspended for the time being. We appreciate that the government has considered the demands of trade and industry and has amended the applicability of provision contained in Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The present update seeks to discuss the amendment made and the implications thereon.
Notification No. 30/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020 inserts the following proviso to Rule 36(4):-
“Provided that the said condition shall apply cumulativelyfor the period February, March, April, May, June, July and August, 2020 and the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the tax period September, 2020 shall be furnished with the cumulative adjustment of input tax credit for the said months in accordance with the condition above.”
According to the above proviso, the provision restricting the input tax credit to the extent of 10% of the input tax credit reflected in the GSTR-2A (if certain invoices are not reflected in GSTR-2A) will be applicable cumulatively for the period February, 2020 to August, 2020 and the taxpayer is required to give cumulative adjustment of the input tax credit in the GSTR-3B filed for the month of September, 2020. In simple words, the requirement of restricting credit to the extent of 10% as contained in Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 that was earlier done on monthly basis has been deferred so as to provide relief to the taxpayers in difficult times.
Now, the following issues come in the minds of taxpayers:-
  1. Whether taxpayer can avail 100% input tax credit for the months of February, 2020 to August, 2020 even if invoices pertaining to the input tax credit is not being reflected in their GSTR-2A for the respective months? Answer is YES. The taxpayer can avail entire input tax credit on goods or services received during the said period on the strength of invoices irrespective of the fact that the said invoices are reflected in the GSTR-2A of the respective months. However, the taxpayer is to cumulatively apply the restriction for the entire period in the GSTR-3B for the month of September, 2020. This is explained with the help of following example:-
MONTH ITC as per invoices received ITC reflected in GSTR-2A for the respective month Details of ITC for previous period reflected subsequently in GSTR-2A ITC taken in GSTR-3B for the respective month ITC that should have been availed as per 10% restriction
JUNE 10,00,000 8,00,000 - 10,00,000 8,80,000
JULY 12,00,000 9,00,000 1,00,000 12,00,000 9,90,000
AUG 12,50,000 12,00,000 3,00,000 12,50,000 12,50,000
 
After implementation of the amended provision, the taxpayer is required to make cumulative adjustment of the invoices for the period February, 2020 to August, 2020 that have not been reflected in GSTR-2A till 11th October, 2020. In the present case, the total input tax credit of the previous period which is not reflected in GSTR-2A is Rs. 1,00,000/- of July month, 2020. It is assumed that the input tax credit of Rs. 50,000/- not reflected in GSTR-2A pertaining to August, 2020 was reflected in subsequent month. Consequently, the taxpayer is required to reverse Rs. 1,00,000/- in the GSTR-3B filed for the month of September, 2020.
 
  1. Whether relaxation is to be applied for the month of September, 2020? Answer is NO. The taxpayer is required to apply the restriction of 10% with respect to invoices not reflected pertaining to input tax credit availed in the month of September, 2020. The relaxation is applicable only for input tax credit pertaining to the month of August, 2020.
  2. For computing the cumulative effect for the purpose of 10% restriction for the period from February, 2020 to August, 2020, taxpayer should download GSTR-2A of which date?
There is nothing clarified in the circular no. 136/06/2020-GST dated 03.04.2020 as regards the date on which GSTR-2A is to be taken for cumulative adjustment of input tax credit. However, reference to clarification issued vide Circular No. 123/42/2019-GST dated 11.11.2019, can be made wherein it was stated that the taxpayer is required to use GSTR-2A as available on the due date of filing of FORM GSTR-1 under section 37(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. Accordingly, we can infer that since cumulative adjustment is to be made in the GSTR-3B for the month of September, 2020, the taxpayer should take GSTR-2A as on the due date of filing GSTR-1 for the month of September, 2020 being 11th October, 2020.  However, it is expected that express clarification should be given by the government at the earliest possible.
 
Before parting, we submit that the above amendment is highly appreciated as it will provide much needed relief to the trade and industry to face the unforeseen pandemic situation. 
This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com