Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on recommendations of gst council with respect to filing of annual return part-12

GST Update on recommendations of gst council with respect to filing of annual return part-12


This Epistle is about the recommendations made during the 31st Meeting of the GST Council and communicated through the Press Release dated 22nd December,
2018. The present update encompasses the Amendments/Changes/Clarifications related to the Annual Returns and related forms including Form GSTR-9, Form
GSTR-9A and Form GSTR-9C.

The important points pertaining to amendments proposed with respect to annual return and related forms are as follows:
 Recently, there was extension in the due date of filing the Annual Return for the Financial Year 2017-2018 vide Order No. 01/2018-Central Tax dated 11.12.2018 wherein the due date was extended from 31.12.2018 to 31.03.2019. However, the Press Release re-schedules the due date of filing annual return for the period 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2018 to 30.06.2019. This is primarily due to the fact that a number of changes have been anticipated in the format of annual return and even the utility for filing the annual return is not operational. This announcement was truly desired as assessees are facing many issues in the first year of GST implementation.

 An important alteration has been done as regards the supplies to be reported in the annual return. It was stated that while filing the details of the Supplies etc in the forms of the Annual Return, “supplies as declared in returns filed during the year” was to be considered irrespective of the fact that wrong reporting was done in the monthly/quarterly returns filed during the financial year. This would lead to nothing but a true example of the famous idiom Garbage in, Garbage out. The assessee was under obligation to simply use the data reflected in the filed GSTR-1 and GSTR 3B returns irrespective of the actual position of supplies. However, the GST Council has proposed to amend the heading to “supplies made during the 
Year” implying that the information about supplies that were submitted in the returns GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B are not the sole basis of filing annual return and the figures of the annual return should incorporate the actual
position of supplies rather than that reported in the monthly/quarterly returns filed by assessee. This would really help the assessees in depicting true picture of their transactions if due to some reason, the rectifications
could not be made in the monthly/quarterly returns filed by them.

For example, while reflecting supplies for the month of March, 2018, the figure was wrongly reported as 70,00,000/- instead of Rs. 7,00,000 in GSTR-3B but
the tax was correctly paid on supplies of Rs. 7,00,000/-. If the assessee could not correct the value of supplies in the subsequent GSTR-3B returns filed upto September, 2018, the assessee was supposed to reflect the value of supplies as Rs. 70,00,000/- in annual return. However, with the proposal of the GST Council, the assessee would be required to correctly report the supplies as Rs. 7,00,000/- irrespective of what was reported in the monthly/quarterly returns filed by them.

 Moreover it is to be noted that all Returns in Form GSTR-1 and Form GSTR3B have to be filed before filing of Form GSTR-9 and Form GSTR-9C. Similarly, Form GSTR-4 (Composition Scheme) must be filed before filing Form GSTR-9A. It is to be noted that the returns for the period July, 2017 to September, 2018 have been permitted to be filed by 31.03.2019 without any late fees. Consequently, one more chance is being given to assessees to file the monthly/quarterly returns and thereafter file correct annual return.

 The reporting requirement at serial no. 18 of the annual return entailed assessee to report HSN wise summary of inward supplies which was cause of concern for entire trade and industry. This reporting was a tedious task particularly with respect of all inward supplies. For example in case of purchase of hardware items, a number of items can be part of invoice such as braces, brackets, door knobs, screws etc. and finding HSN codes of all such different items is a mind blogging task. Similar may be the case with a stationary bill involving number of items like pens, calculator, notebooks etc. having different HSN codes. Consequently, the trade and Industry represented the government to provide relaxation as regards this reporting requirement in annual return. It appears that the request has been partly considered and now, the HSN wise summary is required to be given only for principal inputs whose value independently amounts for 10% or more of the total value of the Inward supplies. This amendment is appreciated and welcomed by the trade and industry.

 It is also stated in the Press Release that additional payments if required to be made by the assessee via annual return are to be paid in cash through Form GST DRC-03. Hence, there will be cash outflow even if the assessee has sufficient balance of input tax credit. Furthermore, in contrast, it is also specified that ITC cannot be availed through annual return and reconciliation statement thereby indicating that assessee is liable to
discharge any additional liability in cash whereas assessee is not allowed to avail any ITC through annual return.

 All invoices pertaining to previous financial year (irrespective of the month in which such invoice is reported in Form GSTR-1) would be auto-populated in Table 8A of Form GSTR-9. It appears that there is some mistake in this
point as mentioned in the press release issued by the government because Table 8A of the GSTR-9 pertain to ITC as per GSTR-2A which would be auto populated. The press release talks about invoices reported in GSTR-1
whereas table 8A of GSTR-9 pertains to ITC on inward supplies which is totally different.

 At the time when the Annual Return was first introduced, there was confusion amongst the assessees about the term “No Supply” as there was no meaning of the said term in the CGST Act, 2017 or the rules made
thereunder. However, many experts opine that ‘no supply’ includes the activities mentioned in Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017. It is clarified that value of ‘non-GST supply’ includes ‘no supply’.

 Last but not the least, as represented by the trade and industry that the last date of availment of input tax credit for the financial year 2017-18 should be extended, the said request has received approval of the GST council. The
last date of availment of Input tax Credit for the financial year 2017-18 as per provision of section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 was 30th September 2018. However, ITC in relation to invoices issued by the supplier during FY 2017-18 can now be availed till the due date for furnishing of Form GSTR3B for the month of March, 2019 (i.e., 20th April, 2019). This was much awaited decision which is highly applauded by the assessees. However, the power of the government to extend the last date of availment of input tax credit needs to be examined as it requires amendment in provisions of CGST Act, 2017 that need to be passed by both houses of the Parliament, needs Presidential assent and also need to be passed by all the State Assemblies. The time needed to implement the extension of the last date to avail input tax credit appears to be too short as it usually takes 7-8 months for an amendment in CGST Act to materialize and the last date of
filing annual return as of now is 30.06.2019.

This is solely for the educational purpose.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com