Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON RCM INTRODUCED IN REAL ESTATE SECTOR

GST UPDATE ON RCM INTRODUCED IN REAL ESTATE SECTOR
GST UPDATE ON RCM INTRODUCED IN REAL ESTATE SECTOR:-
In earlier updates, we have discussed the basic features of the new scheme introduced for the real estate sector by the government recently. In the present update, we seek to discuss the provisions pertaining to of reverse charge mechanism in the real estate sector and its implications thereon. As we know that there are two types of reverse charge mechanism in GST- one under section 9(3) pertaining to specified categories of goods and services and other under section 9(4) pertaining to purchases by unregistered persons. The present update seeks to discuss the notification no. 07/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019 issued under section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 with respect to purchases from unregistered persons. The following entries have been inserted for enabling reverse charge mechanism for developers in case of purchases from unregistered persons:-
  1. The promoter has been specified as the recipient liable to pay tax under reverse charge mechanism for supply of such goods and services or both which constitute shortfall from the minimum value of goods or services or both required to be purchased by a promoter for construction of project in a financial year or part of financial year till the date of issuance of completion certificate or first occupation, whichever is earlier.
  2. The promoter has been specified as the recipient liable to pay tax under reverse charge mechanism for cement which constitute shortfall from the minimum value of goods or services or both required to be purchased by a promoter for construction of project in a financial year or part of financial year till the date of issuance of completion certificate or first occupation, whichever is earlier.
  3. The promoter has been specified as the recipient liable to pay tax under reverse charge mechanism for capital goods falling under any chapter in the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, supplied to a promoter for construction of a project on which tax is payable or paid at the concessional rates.
General Points from Real Estate Rate Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019 which have impact on the present notification:-
 
  1. Proviso no. 5 to the notification states that eighty per cent of the value of input and input services, (other than exceptions as mentioned below) used in supplying the service shall be received from registered supplier only. However, the condition of 80% procurement will not be applicable for the following inputs/input services (being exceptions)-
  2. Services by way of grant of development rights
  3. Long term lease of land against upfront payment in the form of premium, salami, development charges etc.
  4. FSI (including additional FSI)
  5. Electricity
  6. High speed diesel
  7. Motor spirit
  8. Natural Gas
  9. It has been stated that in proviso no. 6 that the inputs and input services on which tax is paid on reverse charge basis shall be deemed to have been purchased from the registered person.
  10. It is further stated in proviso no. 7 that where value of input and input services received from registered suppliers during the financial year (or part of the financial year till the date of issuance of completion certificate or first occupation of the project, whichever is earlier) falls short of the said threshold of 80 per cent., tax shall be paid by the promoter on value of input and input services comprising such shortfall at the rate of eighteen percent on reverse charge basis and all the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall apply to him as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or services or both.
  11. However, the proviso no. 8 overrides the provisions of above mentioned provisos and states that notwithstanding anything contained herein above, where cement is received from an unregistered person, the promoter shall pay tax on supply of such cement at the applicable rates on reverse charge basis and all the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, shall apply to him as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to such supply of cement.
  12. The Explanation no. 1 to the notification further clarifies that the promoter shall maintain project wise account of inward supplies from registered and unregistered supplier and calculate tax payments on the shortfall at the end of the financial year and shall submit the same in the prescribed form electronically on the common portal by end of the quarter following the financial year. The tax liability on the shortfall of inward supplies from unregistered person so determined shall be added to his output tax liability in the month not later than the month of June following the end of the financial year.
  13.  Notwithstanding anything contained in Explanation 1 above, tax on cement received from unregistered person shall be paid in the month in which cement is received.
On harmoniously reading the above provisions, the following conclusions have been drawn:-
  1. Promoter is liable to purchase all capital goods from registered persons for the project otherwise the promoter will be required to pay GST at the applicable rate under reverse charge mechanism.
  2. The purchases of inputs/input services are also required to be made from registered persons to the extent of 80%. The assessee is required to compute the shortfall and pay tax only on shortfall at the rate of 18% except on cement and capital goods. The rate of tax applicable to cement and capital goods will be considered while paying tax under reverse charge mechanism. It is submitted that although for the computation of 80%, cement will be included but all purchases of cement from un-registered suppliers will attract payment of GST at the rate of 28% under reverse charge mechanism and this is also clear from the illustrations given in the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. Therefore, promoters are to ensure that the cement is being purchased from registered suppliers only else they will be liable to pay tax under reverse charge mechanism.
  3. One major issue that will be faced by the condition of purchasing 80% inputs/input services from registered persons is that the promoter/developer will be required to pay GST at the rate of 18% on the shortfall irrespective of the nature of inputs/input services. Furthermore, the promoter will be required to pay GST even if the shortfall consists of exempted inputs/input services. To illustrate, water is exempted but it is main input for construction industry. It is also pertinent to mention that as per the provision contained in 23(1), any person exclusively engaged in the business of supplying goods that are not liable to tax or wholly exempt are not liable to registration. Consequently, the purchase of water will also be leviable to 18% GST under reverse charge mechanism which is totally against the basic framework of GST. Similarly, there will be interest expenses incurred by the promoter which is exempt but will have to be considered for the purpose of computing 80% inputs/input services and will be liable to GST at the rate of 18%. Well, one may interpret that the government assumes that the proportion of exempted inputs/input services is to the extent of 20% only as the non-GST goods such as motor spirit, high speed diesel have been kept out of purview of this computation.
 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com