Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON QRMP SCHEME EFFECTIVE FROM 01.01.2021 159/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON QRMP SCHEME EFFECTIVE FROM 01.01.2021 159/2020-21
Recently, the government has issued number of notifications and clarification with respect to Quarterly Return Monthly Payment (QRMP) Scheme applicable with effect from 01.01.2021, launched for taxpayers having aggregate turnover of upto Rs. 5 Crores in the preceding financial year which is the subject matter of discussion of our present update. As per this QRMP scheme, the taxpayers having aggregate turnover of upto Rs. 5 Crores in the preceding financial year have the option of filing quarterly GSTR-3B with monthly payment of taxes. The salient features of this scheme along with clarifications issued by the government are discussed in our present update.
 
  1. Eligibility criteria and basic framework of the scheme- The taxpayers need to comply with the following requirements in order to avail the benefit of this scheme:-
  • Aggregate turnover upto Rs. 5 Crores in the preceding financial year. If the aggregate turnover exceeds Rs. 5 Crores during any quarter in the current financial year, the registered person shall not be eligible for scheme from the next quarter.
  • The aggregate turnover is to be checked GSTIN wise and it is possible that certain distinct persons opt for QRMP benefit while others continue to operate under normal return mechanism. The aggregate turnover is not to be considered on “PAN” basis.
  • The registered person must have furnished his last return as on due date of exercising option under this scheme.
  • The facility to avail this scheme will be available throughout the year but option once exercised will apply for the entire financial year unless the aggregate turnover exceeds Rs. 5 Crores.
  • Registered person can opt in for any quarter from first day of second month of preceding quarter to the last day of the first month of the quarter. For eg- If QRMP is to be availed for July to September, the taxpayer can exercise option during 1st May to 31st July. Also, the return for the month of June must have been filed as on date of exercising option.
  • The assessees having aggregate turnover upto Rs. 1.5 Crores who have furnished GSTR-1 on quarterly basis will be migrated to quarterly filing by default. Similarly, registered persons having aggregate turnover more than Rs. 1.5 Crores but upto Rs. 5 Crores in the preceding financial year will be migrated to quarterly filing whereas assessees choosing to file monthly GSTR-1 even when their aggregate turnover is less than Rs. 1.5 Crores will be migrated for monthly filing of returns by default. However, the assessee will have option to change the above default option from 5th December, 2020 to 31st January, 2021.
  • The facility for opting out of scheme will be available from first day of second month of preceding quarter to the last day of the first month of the quarter.

  2. Availability of input tax credit to recipient:- The assessees availing benefit of QRMP will have facility to furnish details of outward supplies through Invoice Furnishing Facility -IFF apart from GSTR-1 for the first two months of the quarter so that the recipient can avail input tax credit without waiting for the quarter to end. This facility to upload invoices will be available from 1st to 13th day of the next month subject to limit of value of invoices upto Rs. 50 Lakhs in each month. This is optional facility available to assessees of QRMP scheme. It is to be noted that invoices furnished using IFF are not to be reported again in GSTR-1.
 
3. Monthly payment of tax facility:-The registered person under the QRMP Scheme would be required to pay the tax due in each of the first two months of the quarter by depositing the due amount in FORM GST PMT-06, by the twenty fifth day of the month succeeding such month. While generating the challan, taxpayers should select “Monthly payment for quarterly taxpayer” as reason for generating the challan. The said person can use any of the following two options provided below for monthly payment of tax during the first two months -
 
  • Fixed sum method:-The assessee can opt for paying an amount equal to 35% of the tax paid in cash in the preceding quarter where the return was furnished quarterly or equal to tax paid in cash in the last month immediately preceding quarter where the return was furnished monthly.
PERIODICITY OF LAST RETURN FILED NATURE OF TAX TAX PAID IN CASH TAX REQURIED TO BE PAID UNDER QRMP
Quarterly IGST 100 100*35%=35
Quarterly CGST 200 200*35%=70
Quarterly SGST 200 200*35%=70
Monthly IGST 100 100
Monthly CGST 50 50
Monthly SGST 50 50
 
 
It is to be noted that no tax is required to be paid under QRMP if there is already sufficient balance in electronic cash ledger or electronic credit ledger on the GST portal. The amount of tax is only to be maintained in the electronic cash or credit ledger and is to be offset while filing the quarterly return. The amount of tax deposited is to be considered as deposit which cannot be used for any other purpose till the filing of return for the respective quarter. However, any amount paid excess can be refunded or utilised subsequently by the taxpayer.
 
  • Self assessment method:- The assessee may also pay tax as per actual supplies made during the first and second month of the quarter under QRMP scheme.
4.Interest liability under fixed sum method:-Registered person paying tax under fixed sum method will not be liable to pay interest if the actual tax payable exceeds the amount of 35% deposited, provided the return for the said quarter is filed by due date. If the return for the quarter is filed after due date, interest would be payable on differential tax from the due date till date of making payment.
 
5. Interest liability under self assessment method:- Interest amount would be payable as per the provision of Section 50 of the CGST Act for tax or any part thereof (net of ITC) which remains unpaid / paid beyond the due date for the first two months of the quarter.
The government had granted option of filing quarterly GSTR-1 to assessees having turnover upto Rs. 1.5 Crores for ease in compliance but it resulted in late reflection of input tax credit in GSTR-2 of the recipient thereby leading to delay in availing input tax credit by the recipient and defeating the purpose with which it was introduced. At the same time, the periodicity of filing GSTR-3B remained monthly as the taxes are being paid through GSTR-3B and giving option of quarterly filing of GSTR-3B would lead to delay in revenue for the government. Hence, the government came up with a mid-way by launching this QRMP scheme allowing filing of GSTR-3B quarterly with monthly payment of taxes so that the interest of assessee and government both is being served. However, in our opinion, introducing the option of paying 35% taxes and furnishing details of outward supplies through IFF instead of GSTR-1 upto Rs. 50 Lakhs in a month would increase the compliance burden of the assessees as keeping track of such provisions would be tedious task as is the task of complying with 20% restriction as provided in Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, 2017. 

This is solely for educational purpose.

You can reach us at  www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on  https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/   as well as follow us on twitter at  https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21   and u may also follow us on Linkedin  https://www.linkedin.com/in/ca-pradeep-jain-b6a31a16

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com