Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on problems being faced by Risky Exporters 86/2020-21

GST Update on problems being faced by Risky Exporters 86/2020-21
 A few days ago some newspapers carried a report which read as “Resolve risky exporters' issue immediately, release refunds: FIEO”. This heading of the newspaper states that Federation of Indian Export Organisations has directed fast resolution of issues related to 'risky exporters' and immediate release of their refunds to help them tide over the problems arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. In this update we intend to share problems being faced by Risky Exporters.
Before we move forward let us have a quick look at which exporters are Risky Exporters. An exporter is tagged as risky if the customs department suspects that duty drawback claims and IGST refunds or claims excessive Input tax credit on the basis of bogus invoices. The consignments of risky exporters undergo manual checking before their claims are refunded.
Here is a list of problems being faced by Risky Exporters.
  1. The parameters on which they are flagged as risky is not known.
  2. Refund is being withheld leading to working capital issues.
  3. If all the required formalities are being completed and the department is satisfied as to remove the flag and in fact removes at one port but sometimes do forget to remove at another port resulting in blocking of refund to the exporter and again resulting in the exporter to find out why the refund has been blocked.
  4. Submission of documents demanded by authorities is not easy in the crisis times.  
  5. In case the risky exporter is registered in multi locations that is different units and if registered person of one state is declared as Risky then refund relating to all the units is blocked and the seal of containers even belonging to other units are also cut open. It is being told by Customs department that the audit is being done on IEC basis instead of on Registration basis.
  6. In the above case, the cost to the exporter increases as once the seal is being cut the container is to be fumigated.
  7. Lack of communication from the department to the exporter that he has been flagged as ‘Risky’. He comes to know only when the refund is withheld or the ITC is blocked.
  8. Lack of communication between GST and Customs Department even in the latest era of telecommunication, resulting in the exporter becoming a carrier of information from here to there and vice-a-versa.
  9. Even the supplier of exporter (normally termed as L1 by department) is also being checked if it is pointed out by Delhi office. We have seen that even supplier (L2) of the supplier(L1) of risky exporter is also being physically verified and being checked by CGST department. If this L2 supplier is known as fake invoice credit taking unit then the person who has supplied the fake invoices is also being watched. In some cases, these L2 suppliers are asked to reverse the credit. If he does not do so then the flag of risky exporter is not being removed. But the poor risky exporter do not have dealing with L2 supplier, hence he cannot ask him to reverse the credit. In such circumstances, the flag of risky exporter is not being removed even after 6 months. The poor exporter has to face problems even though there is no fault at his end.
  10. Even the author of this write up has come across situation where the some suppliers of risky exporter have surrendered their registration or their registration is being cancelled. Now the department asks this poor exporter to reverse the credit taken on invoices by such supplier. However, all the invoices of these suppliers are appearing in GSTR-2A. if the amount is huge then the matter is not sorted out and poor exporter is deprived of this genuine refund. Even the interest is not being paid by the department to such exporters. The poor exporter faces the music due to fault of supplier or even supplier of suppliers.
  11. The impression in trade and industry and particularly in exporters is that the Government does not intend to give refunds, hence the concept of “risky exporter” is being introduced.
  12. There is legal backing of this concept of “risky exporter”. If it is challenged in High Court then it will be very difficult to defend in Court of law. There is no provision in law to declare an exporter as “risky exporter”. Even the criteria of its selection is not known to anybody. We were discussing this concept with a senior advocate then a new problem crop up is to challenge it in the state where the IEC registration is taken or in a state where factory is located or in a state in whose area the port is located where action is initiated by putting flag on his IEC. Even it is very cumbersome problem when the export has taken place from different ports falling in different states. The exporter has to find the solutions of all these problems but it is clear that this concept of “risky exporter” will not be legally sustainable. 
The exporters marked as ‘risky’ have their IGST/ITC refunds blocked as well as their duty drawback amount is blocked until they are declared non-risky, such exporters are accountable to complete cargo check at ports and airports which are creating even more hassles for businesses as the customs department does not have enough resources to carry forward such checks. The standard operating procedure which a risky exporter has to be follow is very complex and there is a need to simplify this procedure.
 
This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com