Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on problems being faced by Risky Exporters 86/2020-21

GST Update on problems being faced by Risky Exporters 86/2020-21
 A few days ago some newspapers carried a report which read as “Resolve risky exporters' issue immediately, release refunds: FIEO”. This heading of the newspaper states that Federation of Indian Export Organisations has directed fast resolution of issues related to 'risky exporters' and immediate release of their refunds to help them tide over the problems arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. In this update we intend to share problems being faced by Risky Exporters.
Before we move forward let us have a quick look at which exporters are Risky Exporters. An exporter is tagged as risky if the customs department suspects that duty drawback claims and IGST refunds or claims excessive Input tax credit on the basis of bogus invoices. The consignments of risky exporters undergo manual checking before their claims are refunded.
Here is a list of problems being faced by Risky Exporters.
  1. The parameters on which they are flagged as risky is not known.
  2. Refund is being withheld leading to working capital issues.
  3. If all the required formalities are being completed and the department is satisfied as to remove the flag and in fact removes at one port but sometimes do forget to remove at another port resulting in blocking of refund to the exporter and again resulting in the exporter to find out why the refund has been blocked.
  4. Submission of documents demanded by authorities is not easy in the crisis times.  
  5. In case the risky exporter is registered in multi locations that is different units and if registered person of one state is declared as Risky then refund relating to all the units is blocked and the seal of containers even belonging to other units are also cut open. It is being told by Customs department that the audit is being done on IEC basis instead of on Registration basis.
  6. In the above case, the cost to the exporter increases as once the seal is being cut the container is to be fumigated.
  7. Lack of communication from the department to the exporter that he has been flagged as ‘Risky’. He comes to know only when the refund is withheld or the ITC is blocked.
  8. Lack of communication between GST and Customs Department even in the latest era of telecommunication, resulting in the exporter becoming a carrier of information from here to there and vice-a-versa.
  9. Even the supplier of exporter (normally termed as L1 by department) is also being checked if it is pointed out by Delhi office. We have seen that even supplier (L2) of the supplier(L1) of risky exporter is also being physically verified and being checked by CGST department. If this L2 supplier is known as fake invoice credit taking unit then the person who has supplied the fake invoices is also being watched. In some cases, these L2 suppliers are asked to reverse the credit. If he does not do so then the flag of risky exporter is not being removed. But the poor risky exporter do not have dealing with L2 supplier, hence he cannot ask him to reverse the credit. In such circumstances, the flag of risky exporter is not being removed even after 6 months. The poor exporter has to face problems even though there is no fault at his end.
  10. Even the author of this write up has come across situation where the some suppliers of risky exporter have surrendered their registration or their registration is being cancelled. Now the department asks this poor exporter to reverse the credit taken on invoices by such supplier. However, all the invoices of these suppliers are appearing in GSTR-2A. if the amount is huge then the matter is not sorted out and poor exporter is deprived of this genuine refund. Even the interest is not being paid by the department to such exporters. The poor exporter faces the music due to fault of supplier or even supplier of suppliers.
  11. The impression in trade and industry and particularly in exporters is that the Government does not intend to give refunds, hence the concept of “risky exporter” is being introduced.
  12. There is legal backing of this concept of “risky exporter”. If it is challenged in High Court then it will be very difficult to defend in Court of law. There is no provision in law to declare an exporter as “risky exporter”. Even the criteria of its selection is not known to anybody. We were discussing this concept with a senior advocate then a new problem crop up is to challenge it in the state where the IEC registration is taken or in a state where factory is located or in a state in whose area the port is located where action is initiated by putting flag on his IEC. Even it is very cumbersome problem when the export has taken place from different ports falling in different states. The exporter has to find the solutions of all these problems but it is clear that this concept of “risky exporter” will not be legally sustainable. 
The exporters marked as ‘risky’ have their IGST/ITC refunds blocked as well as their duty drawback amount is blocked until they are declared non-risky, such exporters are accountable to complete cargo check at ports and airports which are creating even more hassles for businesses as the customs department does not have enough resources to carry forward such checks. The standard operating procedure which a risky exporter has to be follow is very complex and there is a need to simplify this procedure.
 
This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com