Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on problems being faced by Risky Exporters 86/2020-21

GST Update on problems being faced by Risky Exporters 86/2020-21
 A few days ago some newspapers carried a report which read as “Resolve risky exporters' issue immediately, release refunds: FIEO”. This heading of the newspaper states that Federation of Indian Export Organisations has directed fast resolution of issues related to 'risky exporters' and immediate release of their refunds to help them tide over the problems arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. In this update we intend to share problems being faced by Risky Exporters.
Before we move forward let us have a quick look at which exporters are Risky Exporters. An exporter is tagged as risky if the customs department suspects that duty drawback claims and IGST refunds or claims excessive Input tax credit on the basis of bogus invoices. The consignments of risky exporters undergo manual checking before their claims are refunded.
Here is a list of problems being faced by Risky Exporters.
  1. The parameters on which they are flagged as risky is not known.
  2. Refund is being withheld leading to working capital issues.
  3. If all the required formalities are being completed and the department is satisfied as to remove the flag and in fact removes at one port but sometimes do forget to remove at another port resulting in blocking of refund to the exporter and again resulting in the exporter to find out why the refund has been blocked.
  4. Submission of documents demanded by authorities is not easy in the crisis times.  
  5. In case the risky exporter is registered in multi locations that is different units and if registered person of one state is declared as Risky then refund relating to all the units is blocked and the seal of containers even belonging to other units are also cut open. It is being told by Customs department that the audit is being done on IEC basis instead of on Registration basis.
  6. In the above case, the cost to the exporter increases as once the seal is being cut the container is to be fumigated.
  7. Lack of communication from the department to the exporter that he has been flagged as ‘Risky’. He comes to know only when the refund is withheld or the ITC is blocked.
  8. Lack of communication between GST and Customs Department even in the latest era of telecommunication, resulting in the exporter becoming a carrier of information from here to there and vice-a-versa.
  9. Even the supplier of exporter (normally termed as L1 by department) is also being checked if it is pointed out by Delhi office. We have seen that even supplier (L2) of the supplier(L1) of risky exporter is also being physically verified and being checked by CGST department. If this L2 supplier is known as fake invoice credit taking unit then the person who has supplied the fake invoices is also being watched. In some cases, these L2 suppliers are asked to reverse the credit. If he does not do so then the flag of risky exporter is not being removed. But the poor risky exporter do not have dealing with L2 supplier, hence he cannot ask him to reverse the credit. In such circumstances, the flag of risky exporter is not being removed even after 6 months. The poor exporter has to face problems even though there is no fault at his end.
  10. Even the author of this write up has come across situation where the some suppliers of risky exporter have surrendered their registration or their registration is being cancelled. Now the department asks this poor exporter to reverse the credit taken on invoices by such supplier. However, all the invoices of these suppliers are appearing in GSTR-2A. if the amount is huge then the matter is not sorted out and poor exporter is deprived of this genuine refund. Even the interest is not being paid by the department to such exporters. The poor exporter faces the music due to fault of supplier or even supplier of suppliers.
  11. The impression in trade and industry and particularly in exporters is that the Government does not intend to give refunds, hence the concept of “risky exporter” is being introduced.
  12. There is legal backing of this concept of “risky exporter”. If it is challenged in High Court then it will be very difficult to defend in Court of law. There is no provision in law to declare an exporter as “risky exporter”. Even the criteria of its selection is not known to anybody. We were discussing this concept with a senior advocate then a new problem crop up is to challenge it in the state where the IEC registration is taken or in a state where factory is located or in a state in whose area the port is located where action is initiated by putting flag on his IEC. Even it is very cumbersome problem when the export has taken place from different ports falling in different states. The exporter has to find the solutions of all these problems but it is clear that this concept of “risky exporter” will not be legally sustainable. 
The exporters marked as ‘risky’ have their IGST/ITC refunds blocked as well as their duty drawback amount is blocked until they are declared non-risky, such exporters are accountable to complete cargo check at ports and airports which are creating even more hassles for businesses as the customs department does not have enough resources to carry forward such checks. The standard operating procedure which a risky exporter has to be follow is very complex and there is a need to simplify this procedure.
 
This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com