Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Practical Example Of Rule 8 Of ITC Pertaining To Credit Reversal For Capital Goods

GST Update on Practical Example Of Rule 8 Of ITC Pertaining To Credit Reversal For Capital Goods

In our earlier update, we discussed the provision contained in Rule 8 with respect to Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 presently in force and the complexity it will bring in compliance by the assessees. In this update, we will explain the computation to be made under Rule 8 with the help of an example. As stated in our earlier update, the calculation is to be separately made for each of the capital goods which are commonly used in business/non-business purposes or in effecting taxable and exempt supplies both.

Assuming that the GST will be implemented w.e.f. 01.06.2017, the facts of our example are as follows:-
M/s XYZ Pvt. Ltd. has purchased capital good say ‘P’ valuing Rs. 2,00,000/- on 02.07.2017 after implementation of GST wherein IGST paid was 18%. Hence, the credit of IGST taken was Rs. 36,000/-. This capital good ‘P’ will be used for effecting both taxable and exempt supplies. 

At the same time, M/XYZ Pvt. Ltd. also has another capital good say ‘Q’ purchased on 01.04.2015 for Rs. 1,00,000/- on which excise duty was paid @ 12.5% and the credit taken was Rs. 12,500/-. This capital good was exclusively used in manufacture of taxable goods and 100% credit was allowed under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 but this capital good will be partly used for effecting exempted supplies under GST regime. Hence, as per Rule 8, credit based on residual life will be added in the output tax liability of M/s XYZ Pvt. Ltd. It is also stated that the turnover of exempted supplies during the tax period (being July, 2017) is Rs. 75,000 and turnover of taxable supplies during the said period is Rs. 25,000. 

As stated earlier, the computation of common credit to be added in the output tax liability pertaining to exempted supplies will be computed separately for capital good ‘P’ and ‘Q’ separately. 
The computation of credit reversal in case of ‘P’ will be as follows:-
Common credit for the tax period July, 2017= 36,000/60 = Rs. 600/- per month for the useful life
Common credit pertaining to exempted supplies= 600*75000/100000
= Rs. 450/-
The amount of Rs. 450/- will be added to the output tax liability of M/s XYZ Pvt. Ltd. every month upto its useful life being 01.07.2022. 
The computation for credit reversal in case of ‘Q’ will be as follows:-
Calculation of common credit based on reduction of 5% points for every quarter or part thereof-
Total number of quarters from 01.04.2015 to 01.07.2017 = 10 Quarters
Common credit= 12500-(10*5%) = Rs. 6,250/-
Common credit during residual life remained= 6250/36 = Rs. 174/- 
Remaining residual life is number of months from 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2020 as the five years from 01.04.2015 comes to 30.06.2020. 
Common credit pertaining to exempted supplies= 174*75000/100000
= Rs. 130 to be added to the output tax liability upto 30.06.2020.

The above example clearly reveals the complexity of the calculation to be made with respect to every capital good. Moreover, the assessee is also required to track the remaining useful life of capital assets as the credit will be added to the output tax liability of the assessee on monthly basis which will be very difficult to implement practically. It is also worth mentioning that even bifurcation of CGST, SGST is to be made which is not taken in the present example as IGST was considered to make the example easy. Hence, the compliance under Rule 8 will be really a tough task for the assessees in the GST regime.

 

Visit us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com