Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Practical Example Of Rule 8 Of ITC Pertaining To Credit Reversal For Capital Goods

GST Update on Practical Example Of Rule 8 Of ITC Pertaining To Credit Reversal For Capital Goods

In our earlier update, we discussed the provision contained in Rule 8 with respect to Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 presently in force and the complexity it will bring in compliance by the assessees. In this update, we will explain the computation to be made under Rule 8 with the help of an example. As stated in our earlier update, the calculation is to be separately made for each of the capital goods which are commonly used in business/non-business purposes or in effecting taxable and exempt supplies both.

Assuming that the GST will be implemented w.e.f. 01.06.2017, the facts of our example are as follows:-
M/s XYZ Pvt. Ltd. has purchased capital good say ‘P’ valuing Rs. 2,00,000/- on 02.07.2017 after implementation of GST wherein IGST paid was 18%. Hence, the credit of IGST taken was Rs. 36,000/-. This capital good ‘P’ will be used for effecting both taxable and exempt supplies. 

At the same time, M/XYZ Pvt. Ltd. also has another capital good say ‘Q’ purchased on 01.04.2015 for Rs. 1,00,000/- on which excise duty was paid @ 12.5% and the credit taken was Rs. 12,500/-. This capital good was exclusively used in manufacture of taxable goods and 100% credit was allowed under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 but this capital good will be partly used for effecting exempted supplies under GST regime. Hence, as per Rule 8, credit based on residual life will be added in the output tax liability of M/s XYZ Pvt. Ltd. It is also stated that the turnover of exempted supplies during the tax period (being July, 2017) is Rs. 75,000 and turnover of taxable supplies during the said period is Rs. 25,000. 

As stated earlier, the computation of common credit to be added in the output tax liability pertaining to exempted supplies will be computed separately for capital good ‘P’ and ‘Q’ separately. 
The computation of credit reversal in case of ‘P’ will be as follows:-
Common credit for the tax period July, 2017= 36,000/60 = Rs. 600/- per month for the useful life
Common credit pertaining to exempted supplies= 600*75000/100000
= Rs. 450/-
The amount of Rs. 450/- will be added to the output tax liability of M/s XYZ Pvt. Ltd. every month upto its useful life being 01.07.2022. 
The computation for credit reversal in case of ‘Q’ will be as follows:-
Calculation of common credit based on reduction of 5% points for every quarter or part thereof-
Total number of quarters from 01.04.2015 to 01.07.2017 = 10 Quarters
Common credit= 12500-(10*5%) = Rs. 6,250/-
Common credit during residual life remained= 6250/36 = Rs. 174/- 
Remaining residual life is number of months from 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2020 as the five years from 01.04.2015 comes to 30.06.2020. 
Common credit pertaining to exempted supplies= 174*75000/100000
= Rs. 130 to be added to the output tax liability upto 30.06.2020.

The above example clearly reveals the complexity of the calculation to be made with respect to every capital good. Moreover, the assessee is also required to track the remaining useful life of capital assets as the credit will be added to the output tax liability of the assessee on monthly basis which will be very difficult to implement practically. It is also worth mentioning that even bifurcation of CGST, SGST is to be made which is not taken in the present example as IGST was considered to make the example easy. Hence, the compliance under Rule 8 will be really a tough task for the assessees in the GST regime.

 

Visit us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com