Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY IN CHANGE IN CONSTITUTION OF FIRM REGISTERED UNDER GST

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY IN CHANGE IN CONSTITUTION OF FIRM REGISTERED UNDER GST
GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY IN CHANGE IN CONSTITUTION OF FIRM REGISTERED UNDER GST:-
As we all know that the introduction of provision restricting the input tax credit which is not reflected in GSTR-2A to the extent of 10% of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices uploaded by the suppliers is cumbersome and tedious for the assessees. The assessees are finding it practically impossible to keep track record of the invoices and reconciling the same with GSTR-2A and many of them are foregoing their option to avail additional 10% of the input tax credit and are simply availing the input tax credit reflected in their GSTR-2A. Apart from the tedious compliance mechanism, another practical difficulty is being faced by the assessees on account of implementation of this provision restricting the credit availment to the extent of 10%.
 
M/s ABC is a proprietorship firm registered in GST Laws and wishes to change the constitution of the firm as partnership firm namely M/s XYZ w.e.f. 01.02.2020 resulting into surrender of M/s ABC and new registration of M/s XYZ. Now, the moot question that arises here is that how will M/s ABC transfer its entire input tax credit to the newly constituted partnership firm being M/s XYZ under GST Laws? It is pertinent to mention here that as per section 18(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 41 of the CGST Rules, 2017, when there is change in constitution of a registered person on account of sale, the registered person shall be allowed to transfer the input tax credit which remains unutilised in his electronic credit ledger to such sold business by filing FORM GST ITC-02 electronically on the common portal. However, the problem faced by the assessee is that the option to file FORM GST ITC-02 is exercisable only once whereas M/s ABC has having substantial input tax credit which is not being reflected in their GSTR-2A. To illustrate, M/s ABC is having invoices involving input tax credit of Rs. 10,00,000/- for their month of January, 2020 out of which invoices to the extent of Rs 5,00,000/- are being reflected in their GSTR-2A. Consequently, M/s ABC can avail input tax credit in their GSTR-3B for the month of January, 2020 upto maximum amount of Rs. 5,50,000/- (5,00,000+10% of Rs. 5,00,000) and so the input tax credit available in electronic credit ledger of M/s ABC would be Rs. 5,50,000/- inspite of the fact that the amount of input tax credit as per invoices is Rs. 10,00,000/- which should have been credited in their electronic credit ledger to be ultimately transferred to M/s XYZ. However, on account of restriction imposed vide Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017, M/s ABC is able to claim input tax credit of Rs. 5,50,000/- in GSTR-3B filed for the month of January, 2020. Moreover, it is very uncertain when will all the input tax credit be reflected in GSTR-2A of M/s ABC. Furthermore, M/s ABC cannot wait for long time for filing ITC-02 as it is to be filed once. There is no provision prescribed in GST Law for dealing with this situation and the only option left with M/s ABC is to avail the entire input tax credit available, i.e., Rs. 10,00,000/- in the GSTR-3B filed for the month of January, 2020 and transfer the same to newly constituted firm M/s XYZ effective from 01.02.2020. Also, M/s ABC will continue its old registration under GST until the entire input tax credit is reflected in its GSTR-2A. This will in turn increase the compliance cost for M/s ABC of filing GST returns till the registration is finally surrendered.
 
It is submitted that even after the above course of action is adopted by M/s ABC, the department can raise objection that the input tax credit which is reflected in GSTR-2A of M/s ABC later on cannot be availed and utilised by M/s XYZ in advance. The department may also insist on payment of interest for availment and utilisation of credit beforehand. Well, a suitable clarification from the government is the need of hour so that unwarranted litigation may be avoided. 
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com