Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST

PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST-
According to the provisions of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, an exporter is eligible to claim refund under either of the following options:
(a) He may supply goods or services under bond without payment of IGST and claim refund of unutilized input tax credit as per section 54 of CGST Act;
(b) He may supply goods or services, on payment of IGST and claim refund of IGST paid on goods and services exported in accordance with provisions of section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017 provides for provision relating to refund of integrated tax paid on goods exported out of India wherein it has been stated that filing of valid return in GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B will be deemed as application of refund. Moreover, section 54(7) prescribes the time limit for issue of order as sixty days from the date of receipt of application of refund which is complete in all respects. It is also worth mentioning that in case of any claim for refund on account of zero rated supplies, section 54(6) provides benefit of provisional refund of 90% of the total amount of refund claimed excluding the amount of input tax credit provisionally accepted. The benefit sought to be given to the exporters by way of provisional refund of 90% of the total refund is with the condition that the amount of provisional input tax credit shall be excluded from the total claim. This in turn seeks to nullify the purpose of the benefit intended to be given to the exporters because the refund claim is required to be sanctioned within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt and the provisional input tax credit takes a period of one month to be able to be considered as final input tax credit. It is submitted that although there is no restriction as regards utilisation of provisional input tax credit, the refund claim filed by the exporters by utilising provisional input tax credit will be withheld until the said input tax credit is finally accepted.

The government has relaxed the provisions regarding filing of GSTR-1, GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 for July, 2017 and August, 2017. The assessee is required to file GSTR-1 for July, 2017 from 1st to 5th September and GSTR-2 for the month of July, 2017 from 6th to 10th September. Hence, the mechanism of provisional input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 will commence in the month of September, 2017. The details of inputs procured from various suppliers by the exporters will be auto-populated in GSTR-2 by 10th September, 2017 and the GSTR-3 for July, 2017 will be filed upto 15th September, 2017. Now, it is not clear that whether the provisionally admissible input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 will be finalised by 15th September or by 30th September, being the last date for filing GSTR-3 for the month of August, 2017. In any case, even if it is assumed that the input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 is finalised by 30th September, 2017, the claim of refund of exporters supplying goods or services on payment of IGST will be delayed. 
Since the closing balance of credit from Excise, VAT and Service Tax returns will be available in the Electronic Cash Ledger only after filing TRAN-1, the export of goods and services on payment of IGST will be made only by utilising the provisional credit admissible to them. It is pertinent to mention that the filing of GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B will be deemed as an application for claiming refund of IGST paid on exports. It is also worth noting that although GSTR-3B has been mentioned as one of the ways of claiming refund of IGST paid on exports but the format does not contain any details pertaining to shipping bill number through which refund could be granted. Hence, it appears that the refund of IGST paid on exports will be admissible only after filing GSTR-3 because the provisional credit used by the exporters will not be refunded on provisional basis. The GSTR-3 for the month of July, 2017 will be filed on 15th September, 2017 which will adversely affect the working capital requirements of the exporters. 
It is also submitted that even for the month of September, 2017, although, the exporter will utilise the provisional credit for payment of IGST and it will be deemed that the refund application of IGST paid on exports has been filed on 20th October, 2017 but inspite of this, the provisional refund to the extent of 90% will be admissible only after 20th November, 2017 when the provisional input tax credit will be finally accepted. This will have the effect that the refund application will be filed on 20.10.2017 whereas the provisional refund of 90% will be granted after 20.11.2017 while the order for refund is to be passed upto 19.12.2017. Say for example, if the opening balance of input tax credit in September, 2017 was Rs. 1,00,000/- while the provisional input tax credit received during the month of September, 2017 was Rs. 5,00,000/- and the IGST paid on exports by utilising input tax credit was Rs. 3,00,000/-, then the exporter will get provisional refund of Rs. 90,000/- (being 90% of Rs. 1,00,000) as the input tax credit of Rs. 5,00,000/- would be finally accepted by 20.11.2017. In our opinion, the ultimate purpose of the benefit will be defeated if the provisional refund is granted excluding the amount of provisional input tax credit.

 

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com