Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST

PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST-
According to the provisions of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, an exporter is eligible to claim refund under either of the following options:
(a) He may supply goods or services under bond without payment of IGST and claim refund of unutilized input tax credit as per section 54 of CGST Act;
(b) He may supply goods or services, on payment of IGST and claim refund of IGST paid on goods and services exported in accordance with provisions of section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017 provides for provision relating to refund of integrated tax paid on goods exported out of India wherein it has been stated that filing of valid return in GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B will be deemed as application of refund. Moreover, section 54(7) prescribes the time limit for issue of order as sixty days from the date of receipt of application of refund which is complete in all respects. It is also worth mentioning that in case of any claim for refund on account of zero rated supplies, section 54(6) provides benefit of provisional refund of 90% of the total amount of refund claimed excluding the amount of input tax credit provisionally accepted. The benefit sought to be given to the exporters by way of provisional refund of 90% of the total refund is with the condition that the amount of provisional input tax credit shall be excluded from the total claim. This in turn seeks to nullify the purpose of the benefit intended to be given to the exporters because the refund claim is required to be sanctioned within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt and the provisional input tax credit takes a period of one month to be able to be considered as final input tax credit. It is submitted that although there is no restriction as regards utilisation of provisional input tax credit, the refund claim filed by the exporters by utilising provisional input tax credit will be withheld until the said input tax credit is finally accepted.

The government has relaxed the provisions regarding filing of GSTR-1, GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 for July, 2017 and August, 2017. The assessee is required to file GSTR-1 for July, 2017 from 1st to 5th September and GSTR-2 for the month of July, 2017 from 6th to 10th September. Hence, the mechanism of provisional input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 will commence in the month of September, 2017. The details of inputs procured from various suppliers by the exporters will be auto-populated in GSTR-2 by 10th September, 2017 and the GSTR-3 for July, 2017 will be filed upto 15th September, 2017. Now, it is not clear that whether the provisionally admissible input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 will be finalised by 15th September or by 30th September, being the last date for filing GSTR-3 for the month of August, 2017. In any case, even if it is assumed that the input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 is finalised by 30th September, 2017, the claim of refund of exporters supplying goods or services on payment of IGST will be delayed. 
Since the closing balance of credit from Excise, VAT and Service Tax returns will be available in the Electronic Cash Ledger only after filing TRAN-1, the export of goods and services on payment of IGST will be made only by utilising the provisional credit admissible to them. It is pertinent to mention that the filing of GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B will be deemed as an application for claiming refund of IGST paid on exports. It is also worth noting that although GSTR-3B has been mentioned as one of the ways of claiming refund of IGST paid on exports but the format does not contain any details pertaining to shipping bill number through which refund could be granted. Hence, it appears that the refund of IGST paid on exports will be admissible only after filing GSTR-3 because the provisional credit used by the exporters will not be refunded on provisional basis. The GSTR-3 for the month of July, 2017 will be filed on 15th September, 2017 which will adversely affect the working capital requirements of the exporters. 
It is also submitted that even for the month of September, 2017, although, the exporter will utilise the provisional credit for payment of IGST and it will be deemed that the refund application of IGST paid on exports has been filed on 20th October, 2017 but inspite of this, the provisional refund to the extent of 90% will be admissible only after 20th November, 2017 when the provisional input tax credit will be finally accepted. This will have the effect that the refund application will be filed on 20.10.2017 whereas the provisional refund of 90% will be granted after 20.11.2017 while the order for refund is to be passed upto 19.12.2017. Say for example, if the opening balance of input tax credit in September, 2017 was Rs. 1,00,000/- while the provisional input tax credit received during the month of September, 2017 was Rs. 5,00,000/- and the IGST paid on exports by utilising input tax credit was Rs. 3,00,000/-, then the exporter will get provisional refund of Rs. 90,000/- (being 90% of Rs. 1,00,000) as the input tax credit of Rs. 5,00,000/- would be finally accepted by 20.11.2017. In our opinion, the ultimate purpose of the benefit will be defeated if the provisional refund is granted excluding the amount of provisional input tax credit.

 

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com