Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST

GST UPDATE ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST

PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY FOR EXPORTERS SUPPLYING GOODS ON PAYMENT OF IGST-
According to the provisions of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, an exporter is eligible to claim refund under either of the following options:
(a) He may supply goods or services under bond without payment of IGST and claim refund of unutilized input tax credit as per section 54 of CGST Act;
(b) He may supply goods or services, on payment of IGST and claim refund of IGST paid on goods and services exported in accordance with provisions of section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017 provides for provision relating to refund of integrated tax paid on goods exported out of India wherein it has been stated that filing of valid return in GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B will be deemed as application of refund. Moreover, section 54(7) prescribes the time limit for issue of order as sixty days from the date of receipt of application of refund which is complete in all respects. It is also worth mentioning that in case of any claim for refund on account of zero rated supplies, section 54(6) provides benefit of provisional refund of 90% of the total amount of refund claimed excluding the amount of input tax credit provisionally accepted. The benefit sought to be given to the exporters by way of provisional refund of 90% of the total refund is with the condition that the amount of provisional input tax credit shall be excluded from the total claim. This in turn seeks to nullify the purpose of the benefit intended to be given to the exporters because the refund claim is required to be sanctioned within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt and the provisional input tax credit takes a period of one month to be able to be considered as final input tax credit. It is submitted that although there is no restriction as regards utilisation of provisional input tax credit, the refund claim filed by the exporters by utilising provisional input tax credit will be withheld until the said input tax credit is finally accepted.

The government has relaxed the provisions regarding filing of GSTR-1, GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 for July, 2017 and August, 2017. The assessee is required to file GSTR-1 for July, 2017 from 1st to 5th September and GSTR-2 for the month of July, 2017 from 6th to 10th September. Hence, the mechanism of provisional input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 will commence in the month of September, 2017. The details of inputs procured from various suppliers by the exporters will be auto-populated in GSTR-2 by 10th September, 2017 and the GSTR-3 for July, 2017 will be filed upto 15th September, 2017. Now, it is not clear that whether the provisionally admissible input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 will be finalised by 15th September or by 30th September, being the last date for filing GSTR-3 for the month of August, 2017. In any case, even if it is assumed that the input tax credit for the month of July, 2017 is finalised by 30th September, 2017, the claim of refund of exporters supplying goods or services on payment of IGST will be delayed. 
Since the closing balance of credit from Excise, VAT and Service Tax returns will be available in the Electronic Cash Ledger only after filing TRAN-1, the export of goods and services on payment of IGST will be made only by utilising the provisional credit admissible to them. It is pertinent to mention that the filing of GSTR-3 or GSTR-3B will be deemed as an application for claiming refund of IGST paid on exports. It is also worth noting that although GSTR-3B has been mentioned as one of the ways of claiming refund of IGST paid on exports but the format does not contain any details pertaining to shipping bill number through which refund could be granted. Hence, it appears that the refund of IGST paid on exports will be admissible only after filing GSTR-3 because the provisional credit used by the exporters will not be refunded on provisional basis. The GSTR-3 for the month of July, 2017 will be filed on 15th September, 2017 which will adversely affect the working capital requirements of the exporters. 
It is also submitted that even for the month of September, 2017, although, the exporter will utilise the provisional credit for payment of IGST and it will be deemed that the refund application of IGST paid on exports has been filed on 20th October, 2017 but inspite of this, the provisional refund to the extent of 90% will be admissible only after 20th November, 2017 when the provisional input tax credit will be finally accepted. This will have the effect that the refund application will be filed on 20.10.2017 whereas the provisional refund of 90% will be granted after 20.11.2017 while the order for refund is to be passed upto 19.12.2017. Say for example, if the opening balance of input tax credit in September, 2017 was Rs. 1,00,000/- while the provisional input tax credit received during the month of September, 2017 was Rs. 5,00,000/- and the IGST paid on exports by utilising input tax credit was Rs. 3,00,000/-, then the exporter will get provisional refund of Rs. 90,000/- (being 90% of Rs. 1,00,000) as the input tax credit of Rs. 5,00,000/- would be finally accepted by 20.11.2017. In our opinion, the ultimate purpose of the benefit will be defeated if the provisional refund is granted excluding the amount of provisional input tax credit.

 

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com