Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON NEW ORDER OF UTILISATION OF CREDIT

GST UPDATE ON NEW ORDER OF UTILISATION OF CREDIT
Today we are sharing an update on the new order of utilization of input tax credit. A few days ago, government had inserted sections 49A and 49B in the CGST Act 2017 through CGST Amendment Act 2018 which came into effect from 01.02.2019. We had prepared an update on the same in which comparision was made between the existing and the new manner of utilization of input tax credit and it was pointed that the new mechanism is leading to payment of tax in cash under SGST inspite of credit balance available in CGST head.This update seeks to discuss the manner of utilisation of input tax credit as per Rule 88A of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Before proceeding further, let us recall the provisions of newly inserted Sections 49A and 49B.
49A. UTILISATION OF INPUT TAX CREDIT SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS:- Notwithstanding anything contained in section 49, the input tax credit on account of central tax, State tax or Union territory tax shall be utilised towards payment of integrated tax, central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, only after the input tax credit available on account of integrated tax has first been utilised fully towards such payment.
49B. ORDER OF UTILISATION OF INPUT TAX CREDIT:- Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter and subject to the provisions of clause (e) and clause (f) of sub-section (5) of section 49, the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, prescribe the order and manner of utilisation of the input tax credit on account of integrated tax, central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, towards payment of any such tax.”.
Now a new notification 16/2019-Central tax has been issued on 29th March 2019 by the government making changes in the Central Goods & Service Tax (Rules) 2017. This notification has inserted a new rule 88A dealing with the provisions of order of utilisation of credit which is in line with the newly inserted section 49A stated above. New Rule 88A is stated below as follows:-
Rule 88A. Order of utilization of input tax credit.-
Input tax credit on account of integrated tax shall first be utilised towards payment of integrated tax, and the amount remaining, if any, may be utilised towards the payment of central tax and State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, in any order:
Provided that the input tax credit on account of central tax, State tax or Union territory tax shall be utilised towards payment of integrated tax, central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be,only after the input tax credit available on account of integrated tax has first been utilised fully.”.
The new Rule 88A provides that the ITC of IGST shall be utilised first towards discharging IGST liability and further gives an option to the taxpayers to offset the remaining balance of IGST ITCagainst liability of CGST/SGST/UTGST in any manner.In our point of view, as per Rule 88A credit can be utilized in the following manner:
  1. The credit balance of IGST is to be exhausted for discharging tax liability for IGST and thereafter, the remaining balance of IGST is to be used for discharging CGST or SGST or UTGST in any manner as per the choice of assessee. It is to be noted that firstly the ITC balance of IGST is required to be exhausted completely.
  2. Thereafter, the balance of CGST is to be exhausted for discharging tax liability of CGST and IGST.
  3. Lastly, the balance of SGST is to be exhausted for discharging tax liability of SGST and IGST.
 
This interpretation is explained with the help of same example as taken by us in our earlier update on utilisation of credit.
 
 
 
INPUT TAX CREDIT BALANCE     
IGST CGST SGST
5,00,000 10,00,000 10,00,000 + 1,00,000 transitional credit
 
The balance of SGST is more as transitional VAT credit was carried forward in the GST regime.
OUTPUT TAX LIABILITY
IGST CGST SGST
2,00,000 12,00,000 12,00,000
 
As per the amendment applicable w.e.f. 01.02.2019, the liability shall be discharged through credit in the following manner:-
 
PARTICULARS IGST CGST SGST
Output Tax Liability 2,00,000 12,00,000 12,00,000
Less: IGST credit utilized (2,00,000) (3,00,000) -
Less: CGST credit utilized - (9,00,000) -
Less: SGST credit utilized -
 
- (11,00,000)
Liability to be paid in cash 0 0 1,00,000
ITC Carried Forward 0 1,00,000 0
 
After the insertion of Rule 88A of the CGST Rules, 2017, the order of utilisation of credit will be as follows:
 
PARTICULARS IGST CGST SGST
Output Tax Liability 2,00,000 12,00,000 12,00,000
Less: IGST credit utilized (2,00,000) (2,00,000) (1,00,000)
Less: CGST credit utilized - (10,00,000) -
Less: SGST credit utilized -
 
- (11,00,000)
Liability to be paid in cash 0 0 0
ITC Carried Forward 0 0 0
 
If we compare the provisions, it is found that prior to introduction of Rule 88A, there was requirement to pay Rs. 1,00,000 in cash in SGST while the balance of CGST was unutilised to the extent of Rs. 1,00,000/-. However, as per the new Rule 88A, the assessee has the option to set off the credit in any manner but only after utilizing the balance first towards discharging IGST liability. So in the above example there is neither any balance in the tax ledgers nor there is requirement to pay tax in cash.
Now, the question arises here is whether Rule 88Acan prescribe additional mechanism for utilisation of credit when the section 49A which overrides section 49 does not provide for? However, in GST regime, the irony is that the software of GST portal is supreme and should be compatible with the mechanism provided by the GST Act and Rules as until the software doesn’t support the new mechanism, the introduction of new sections and rules for the benefit of the taxpayers would be of no use.   
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com