Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON LEVY OF GST ON CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF SOCIETY 157/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON LEVY OF GST ON CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF SOCIETY 157/2020-21
 Supply of goods and services by clubs, societies to its members has always been a matter of discussion as to the applicability of the principle of mutuality be it in the case of Income tax, sales tax or service tax. This dispute is even been carried forward to goods and service tax regime. In this update we shall be discussing the ruling pronounced by Maharashtra AAAR in the case of M/s Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.  M/s Apsara Co-Operative Housing Society is a Co-operative Housing Society, registered under the Maharashtra State Co-operative Society Act 1960. The main object as per the bye-laws are to obtain the conveyance from the promoter, to manage, maintain and administer the property of the society, to raise funds for achieving the objective of the society, to undertake and provide for, on its own account or jointly with Co-operative etc. For the purpose of obtaining the above objectives of the society, they raise funds by collecting contributions from the members of the Society, which are also called “charges” in terms of the bye-laws. The charges include property taxes, water charges, common electricity charges, contribution to repair and maintenance fund, contribution to the sinking fund, services charges, car parking charges, interest on the default charges, non-occupancy, insurance charges, etc. The AAR has passed the decision against the applicant wherein it was held that activities carried out by the Appellant would amount to supply in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act,2017 and accordingly would attract GST, as provided under Section 9 of the CGST Act,2017.
The following questions were put before the Maharashtra AAR
i) Whether the activities carried out by appellant would amount to supply and whether the same are liable to GST?
ii) Whether they are correctly discharging the GST liability, for which they provided the illustrative invoices raised on the members of the society?
Being aggrieved, the applicant filed an appeal before AAAR wherein the following contentions were submitted
a.     It is submitted that the ruling was passed without considering the judgement passed by Honourable Supreme court in the case of State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited.
b.     Further AAR have based their ruling on the basis of circulars and notifications issued by CBIC issued under GST.
c.      They are not carrying out any business as per Section 2(17) of CGST Act 2017 as the main objective is maintenance of society and is not engaged in any trade.
d.     Reliance has been placed by the applicant on the following cases pronounced by the Maharashtra AAAR
1)     M/s Lions Club of Poona Kothurd
2)     M/s Rotary club of Mumbai Western Elite.
In the above cases, it was asserted that the society charges which are meant toward meeting the administrative expenses of the society are similar to membership fees collected by the club and the same shall not be construed as “Consideration”. Therefore, society charges shall not be subject to GST.
e.     Reliance had also been placed on the favourable high court judgements which are as follows
1)     M/s Saturday Club Limited.
2)     M/s Sports Club of Gujarat Limited.
Maharashtra AAAR ruled that activities carried out by the appellant would amount to ‘Supply’ on the basis of the following
·         All the activities of Appellant would rightly get covered under the definition of term ‘business’ as provided under section 2(17)(e) of the CGST Act,2017, which unequivocally stipulates that provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members would be included under the meaning of the term business.
·         The term ‘service’ has been rendered a very wide connotation. It is clear that the activities undertaken by Appellant would rightly be covered under scope of the term ‘service’.
·         Since the Appellant is providing services to its members against the consideration named as ‘society charges’ in the course or furtherance of business, therefore, the activities would be construed as ‘supply’ in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act ,2017 , and accordingly will be liable for GST.
·         As regards the second question raised i.e. whether they are correctly discharging their GST liability, the AAAR agreed with ruling of AAR wherein they have held that it cannot be answered in terms of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, on the premise that the AAR can only comment on the determination of the liability as to whether any supply of goods or services or both are liable for GST or otherwise but cannot comment on the computation or assessment of the tax liability.
The tussle regarding levy of tax on goods or services provided by club or society to its members is continuing in GST regime as well inspite of favourable decisions rendered by Supreme Court on the similar issue in the erstwhile regime. Nonetheless, it appears that the dispute will be settled by Supreme Court for provisions contained in GST regime as well.

This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21and u may also follow us on Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/ca-pradeep-jain-b6a31a16
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com