Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON LEVY OF GST ON CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF SOCIETY 157/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON LEVY OF GST ON CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF SOCIETY 157/2020-21
 Supply of goods and services by clubs, societies to its members has always been a matter of discussion as to the applicability of the principle of mutuality be it in the case of Income tax, sales tax or service tax. This dispute is even been carried forward to goods and service tax regime. In this update we shall be discussing the ruling pronounced by Maharashtra AAAR in the case of M/s Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.  M/s Apsara Co-Operative Housing Society is a Co-operative Housing Society, registered under the Maharashtra State Co-operative Society Act 1960. The main object as per the bye-laws are to obtain the conveyance from the promoter, to manage, maintain and administer the property of the society, to raise funds for achieving the objective of the society, to undertake and provide for, on its own account or jointly with Co-operative etc. For the purpose of obtaining the above objectives of the society, they raise funds by collecting contributions from the members of the Society, which are also called “charges” in terms of the bye-laws. The charges include property taxes, water charges, common electricity charges, contribution to repair and maintenance fund, contribution to the sinking fund, services charges, car parking charges, interest on the default charges, non-occupancy, insurance charges, etc. The AAR has passed the decision against the applicant wherein it was held that activities carried out by the Appellant would amount to supply in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act,2017 and accordingly would attract GST, as provided under Section 9 of the CGST Act,2017.
The following questions were put before the Maharashtra AAR
i) Whether the activities carried out by appellant would amount to supply and whether the same are liable to GST?
ii) Whether they are correctly discharging the GST liability, for which they provided the illustrative invoices raised on the members of the society?
Being aggrieved, the applicant filed an appeal before AAAR wherein the following contentions were submitted
a.     It is submitted that the ruling was passed without considering the judgement passed by Honourable Supreme court in the case of State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited.
b.     Further AAR have based their ruling on the basis of circulars and notifications issued by CBIC issued under GST.
c.      They are not carrying out any business as per Section 2(17) of CGST Act 2017 as the main objective is maintenance of society and is not engaged in any trade.
d.     Reliance has been placed by the applicant on the following cases pronounced by the Maharashtra AAAR
1)     M/s Lions Club of Poona Kothurd
2)     M/s Rotary club of Mumbai Western Elite.
In the above cases, it was asserted that the society charges which are meant toward meeting the administrative expenses of the society are similar to membership fees collected by the club and the same shall not be construed as “Consideration”. Therefore, society charges shall not be subject to GST.
e.     Reliance had also been placed on the favourable high court judgements which are as follows
1)     M/s Saturday Club Limited.
2)     M/s Sports Club of Gujarat Limited.
Maharashtra AAAR ruled that activities carried out by the appellant would amount to ‘Supply’ on the basis of the following
·         All the activities of Appellant would rightly get covered under the definition of term ‘business’ as provided under section 2(17)(e) of the CGST Act,2017, which unequivocally stipulates that provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members would be included under the meaning of the term business.
·         The term ‘service’ has been rendered a very wide connotation. It is clear that the activities undertaken by Appellant would rightly be covered under scope of the term ‘service’.
·         Since the Appellant is providing services to its members against the consideration named as ‘society charges’ in the course or furtherance of business, therefore, the activities would be construed as ‘supply’ in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act ,2017 , and accordingly will be liable for GST.
·         As regards the second question raised i.e. whether they are correctly discharging their GST liability, the AAAR agreed with ruling of AAR wherein they have held that it cannot be answered in terms of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, on the premise that the AAR can only comment on the determination of the liability as to whether any supply of goods or services or both are liable for GST or otherwise but cannot comment on the computation or assessment of the tax liability.
The tussle regarding levy of tax on goods or services provided by club or society to its members is continuing in GST regime as well inspite of favourable decisions rendered by Supreme Court on the similar issue in the erstwhile regime. Nonetheless, it appears that the dispute will be settled by Supreme Court for provisions contained in GST regime as well.

This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21and u may also follow us on Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/ca-pradeep-jain-b6a31a16
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com