Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON LEVY OF GST ON CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF SOCIETY 157/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON LEVY OF GST ON CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF SOCIETY 157/2020-21
 Supply of goods and services by clubs, societies to its members has always been a matter of discussion as to the applicability of the principle of mutuality be it in the case of Income tax, sales tax or service tax. This dispute is even been carried forward to goods and service tax regime. In this update we shall be discussing the ruling pronounced by Maharashtra AAAR in the case of M/s Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.  M/s Apsara Co-Operative Housing Society is a Co-operative Housing Society, registered under the Maharashtra State Co-operative Society Act 1960. The main object as per the bye-laws are to obtain the conveyance from the promoter, to manage, maintain and administer the property of the society, to raise funds for achieving the objective of the society, to undertake and provide for, on its own account or jointly with Co-operative etc. For the purpose of obtaining the above objectives of the society, they raise funds by collecting contributions from the members of the Society, which are also called “charges” in terms of the bye-laws. The charges include property taxes, water charges, common electricity charges, contribution to repair and maintenance fund, contribution to the sinking fund, services charges, car parking charges, interest on the default charges, non-occupancy, insurance charges, etc. The AAR has passed the decision against the applicant wherein it was held that activities carried out by the Appellant would amount to supply in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act,2017 and accordingly would attract GST, as provided under Section 9 of the CGST Act,2017.
The following questions were put before the Maharashtra AAR
i) Whether the activities carried out by appellant would amount to supply and whether the same are liable to GST?
ii) Whether they are correctly discharging the GST liability, for which they provided the illustrative invoices raised on the members of the society?
Being aggrieved, the applicant filed an appeal before AAAR wherein the following contentions were submitted
a.     It is submitted that the ruling was passed without considering the judgement passed by Honourable Supreme court in the case of State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited.
b.     Further AAR have based their ruling on the basis of circulars and notifications issued by CBIC issued under GST.
c.      They are not carrying out any business as per Section 2(17) of CGST Act 2017 as the main objective is maintenance of society and is not engaged in any trade.
d.     Reliance has been placed by the applicant on the following cases pronounced by the Maharashtra AAAR
1)     M/s Lions Club of Poona Kothurd
2)     M/s Rotary club of Mumbai Western Elite.
In the above cases, it was asserted that the society charges which are meant toward meeting the administrative expenses of the society are similar to membership fees collected by the club and the same shall not be construed as “Consideration”. Therefore, society charges shall not be subject to GST.
e.     Reliance had also been placed on the favourable high court judgements which are as follows
1)     M/s Saturday Club Limited.
2)     M/s Sports Club of Gujarat Limited.
Maharashtra AAAR ruled that activities carried out by the appellant would amount to ‘Supply’ on the basis of the following
·         All the activities of Appellant would rightly get covered under the definition of term ‘business’ as provided under section 2(17)(e) of the CGST Act,2017, which unequivocally stipulates that provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members would be included under the meaning of the term business.
·         The term ‘service’ has been rendered a very wide connotation. It is clear that the activities undertaken by Appellant would rightly be covered under scope of the term ‘service’.
·         Since the Appellant is providing services to its members against the consideration named as ‘society charges’ in the course or furtherance of business, therefore, the activities would be construed as ‘supply’ in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act ,2017 , and accordingly will be liable for GST.
·         As regards the second question raised i.e. whether they are correctly discharging their GST liability, the AAAR agreed with ruling of AAR wherein they have held that it cannot be answered in terms of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, on the premise that the AAR can only comment on the determination of the liability as to whether any supply of goods or services or both are liable for GST or otherwise but cannot comment on the computation or assessment of the tax liability.
The tussle regarding levy of tax on goods or services provided by club or society to its members is continuing in GST regime as well inspite of favourable decisions rendered by Supreme Court on the similar issue in the erstwhile regime. Nonetheless, it appears that the dispute will be settled by Supreme Court for provisions contained in GST regime as well.

This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21and u may also follow us on Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/ca-pradeep-jain-b6a31a16
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com