Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on leviability of service tax/GST on liquor license

GST Update on leviability of service tax/GST on liquor license
GST Update on leviability of service tax/GST on liquor license:-
 
The leviability of service tax on liquor license has been a matter of dispute as many hotels were issued show cause notices for not paying service tax under reverse charge mechanism on charges paid for obtaining liquor license to the State Government. The question that arises is whether the grant of license by the government to sell liquor is service provided by the government or is extension of its statutory/sovereign functions which are not liable to tax?
 
If we talk of pre-GST era, it is found that the grant of license by the government was neither covered under negative list nor covered under the Mega Exemption Notification. Moreover, there was doubt that the said activity was statutory function of the government. Accordingly, service tax liability was raised on various assessees under reverse charge mechanism. In contrast, if we observe the provisions in the GST regime, it is found that the definition of supply given under section 7(1)(a) includes all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license, rental, lease of disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business. It is submitted that the definition of supply explicitly mentions license within its ambit and so it can be said that grant of license is liable to GST and that too, under reverse charge mechanism.
 
However, altogether different facts have emerged recently as regards levy of GST on liquor license in recent times. The GST Council in its 26th meeting held on 10.3.2018, declared that:
(i) GST is not leviable on licences for alcoholic liquor for human consumption; and
(ii) This would also apply mutatis mutandis to the demands by service tax/Central Excise authorities of service tax on licences for alcoholic liquor for human consumption in the pre-GST era, i.e. from period 1st April 2016 to June 2017.
 
Thereafter, Haryana Government issued letter no. 8044/X-1 dated 10.03.2018 based on the decision of the GST Council Meeting that GST/service tax is not leviable on the grant of license for liquor. However, no notification has been issued till date as regards non-levy of GST/service tax on the charges of liquor license and the assessees were in delimma whether GST/service tax was payable by them under reverse charge mechanism or not. But, the confusion of the assessees seem to be cleared by the recent decision rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Jagatjit Industries Limited & ANR Vs Union of India & Others and Sabmiller India Limited & ANR Vs Union of India & Others in Writ Petition No. 3277/2017 & 4204/2017 wherein it was held that since the Central Government has accepted the decision of the GST Council as evidenced from the communication addressed to the Joint Commissioner (Legal) vide letter dated 31.07.2018, the challenge to the relevant provisions of law have been rendered as irrelevant. Therefore, the position as regards levy of service tax/GST on license fees is clear that no tax is payable by the assessee on such charges.
 
It is submitted that although it is clear that no tax is payable by the assessee under reverse charge mechanism but what will be the recourse available to the assessees who have concluded their cases by paying the applicable service tax along with interest and 15% penalty in the erstwhile regime? Will such assessees have the option to file refund claim of the taxes paid by them is a serious question as the incidence of tax was borne by the said assessees.
 
It is also worth noting that apart from this issue wherein the decision of GST Council Meeting was not implemented by way of issuance of notification, there are many instances wherein the Council has taken decision in the meeting but the same is not implemented. Say for example in the Press Note dated 21.07.2018 issued as regards the recommendations made during the 28th Meeting of GST Council held on 21.07.2018, it was stated in point no. 10 that the liability to pay interest is being done away in case recipient fails to pay the due amount to the supplier within 180 days from the date of issue of invoice but no such provision is incorporated in the amendment bill passed in the Lok Sabha. Now, the question that arises is what is the fate of the decision of the GST Council in 28th Meeting which is not implemented till date? Whether the assessee has the only option to knock the doors of the High Court so as to know the exact position of law? Or it will be presumed that these are implemented and assessee start taking benefit of the same following the analogy of this High Court decision.


           
  
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com