Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on leviability of service tax/GST on liquor license

GST Update on leviability of service tax/GST on liquor license
GST Update on leviability of service tax/GST on liquor license:-
 
The leviability of service tax on liquor license has been a matter of dispute as many hotels were issued show cause notices for not paying service tax under reverse charge mechanism on charges paid for obtaining liquor license to the State Government. The question that arises is whether the grant of license by the government to sell liquor is service provided by the government or is extension of its statutory/sovereign functions which are not liable to tax?
 
If we talk of pre-GST era, it is found that the grant of license by the government was neither covered under negative list nor covered under the Mega Exemption Notification. Moreover, there was doubt that the said activity was statutory function of the government. Accordingly, service tax liability was raised on various assessees under reverse charge mechanism. In contrast, if we observe the provisions in the GST regime, it is found that the definition of supply given under section 7(1)(a) includes all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license, rental, lease of disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business. It is submitted that the definition of supply explicitly mentions license within its ambit and so it can be said that grant of license is liable to GST and that too, under reverse charge mechanism.
 
However, altogether different facts have emerged recently as regards levy of GST on liquor license in recent times. The GST Council in its 26th meeting held on 10.3.2018, declared that:
(i) GST is not leviable on licences for alcoholic liquor for human consumption; and
(ii) This would also apply mutatis mutandis to the demands by service tax/Central Excise authorities of service tax on licences for alcoholic liquor for human consumption in the pre-GST era, i.e. from period 1st April 2016 to June 2017.
 
Thereafter, Haryana Government issued letter no. 8044/X-1 dated 10.03.2018 based on the decision of the GST Council Meeting that GST/service tax is not leviable on the grant of license for liquor. However, no notification has been issued till date as regards non-levy of GST/service tax on the charges of liquor license and the assessees were in delimma whether GST/service tax was payable by them under reverse charge mechanism or not. But, the confusion of the assessees seem to be cleared by the recent decision rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Jagatjit Industries Limited & ANR Vs Union of India & Others and Sabmiller India Limited & ANR Vs Union of India & Others in Writ Petition No. 3277/2017 & 4204/2017 wherein it was held that since the Central Government has accepted the decision of the GST Council as evidenced from the communication addressed to the Joint Commissioner (Legal) vide letter dated 31.07.2018, the challenge to the relevant provisions of law have been rendered as irrelevant. Therefore, the position as regards levy of service tax/GST on license fees is clear that no tax is payable by the assessee on such charges.
 
It is submitted that although it is clear that no tax is payable by the assessee under reverse charge mechanism but what will be the recourse available to the assessees who have concluded their cases by paying the applicable service tax along with interest and 15% penalty in the erstwhile regime? Will such assessees have the option to file refund claim of the taxes paid by them is a serious question as the incidence of tax was borne by the said assessees.
 
It is also worth noting that apart from this issue wherein the decision of GST Council Meeting was not implemented by way of issuance of notification, there are many instances wherein the Council has taken decision in the meeting but the same is not implemented. Say for example in the Press Note dated 21.07.2018 issued as regards the recommendations made during the 28th Meeting of GST Council held on 21.07.2018, it was stated in point no. 10 that the liability to pay interest is being done away in case recipient fails to pay the due amount to the supplier within 180 days from the date of issue of invoice but no such provision is incorporated in the amendment bill passed in the Lok Sabha. Now, the question that arises is what is the fate of the decision of the GST Council in 28th Meeting which is not implemented till date? Whether the assessee has the only option to knock the doors of the High Court so as to know the exact position of law? Or it will be presumed that these are implemented and assessee start taking benefit of the same following the analogy of this High Court decision.


           
  
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com