Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS

GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS
GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS
 
The Duty Free Shops (DFS) located at Airports have been showered with various exemptions from levy of taxes so that they are internationally competitive with other DFS and also to promote foreign trade and conservation of foreign exchange. With the introduction of GST regime, a big question that remained unanswered was whether IGST is leviable on the procurement of goods from foreign countries by DFS and sale of goods by DFS to international passengers travelling abroad. This question was raised by M/s Rod Retail Pvt. Ltd. [2018 (12) G.S.T.L. 206 (A.A.R.-GST)] before the Delhi Authority for Advance Ruling under GST wherein it was ruled that under GST regime, the scenario has changed and export under GST takes place only when goods are taken out to a place outside India. Hence, export takes place only when goods cross territorial waters/airspace of India and not merely on crossing the customs barriers. As DFSs are established beyond customs Frontiers but are not located outside India, sales of goods by DFS at airport do not qualify as export and IGST is payable on sale of goods by DFS. However, this issue was once again litigated by way of writ petition filed in Bombay High Court reported as Sandeep Patil Versus Union of India [2019 (31) G.S.T.L. 398 (Bom.)]. The present update seeks to discuss the reasoning adopted by the Hon’ble High Court as regards applicability of IGST on sale of goods by duty free shops (DFS). The issue regarding admissibility of input tax credit on various services procured by DFS and eligibility to claim refund of the same under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017 was also examined by this writ petition. 
The observations made in this case are summarized as follows:-
  1. DFSs are located in customs station as defined in Section 2(13) of the Customs Act, 1962. DFS are issued a special warehouse licence under Section 58A of the Customs Act and are part of ‘custom area’ as defined in the Customs Act.
 
  1. Whenever goods are imported by DFS, bill of entry for warehousing is being filed under section 46 of the Customs Act and also executes a bond after which ‘space certificate’ is issued for physical storage of goods into customs bonded warehouse. When the goods move from special warehouse to DFS, the same are moved under physical supervision of proper officer. The imported goods continue to be within the custom area and are not removed for home consumption as provided for under Section 68 of the Customs Act, which is by filing an ex-bond bill of entry for clearance for home consumption on payment of duty. It, therefore, follows that all sales and supplies take place from or within the custom area.
 
  1. Invoice issued by DFS at the time of sale of goods to outbound passengers, which is signed by outbound passenger and cashier clearly mentions that supply of duty free goods is with condition that passenger will not consume goods until he lands at the final destination outside India, and further that passenger shall become owner of goods only upon reaching the final destination. It is also ensured that if the passenger is not able to board the aircraft leaving India, the goods will have to be returned back to DFS whereupon the sale is declared void and refund is given to the passenger.
 
  1. DFS also procures various input services such as rent, warehouse and other charges, maintenance services, CHA Services, Professional Services, etc., which are used in the course or in furtherance of its business. Hence, credit of entire GST paid on input services is available to DFS under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act and refund of the same can be claimed under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules as supplies made by DFS to outbound passengers is to be considered as export.
 
Reasoning adopted by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court:-
 
  • The decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in India Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. Through Hotel Ashokav. CCT, [(2012) 3 SCC 204 = 2012 (276) E.L.T. 433(S.C.)]in the matter of DFSs at international airport at Bengaluru was followed wherein it was confirmed that when goods are kept in bonded warehouses, it cannot be said that they have crossed the Customs Frontiers and so the goods sold before importation are not liable to tax. The above reasoning adopted by referring the provisions of Article 286 of the Constitution which mentions that State has no right to tax supply of goods or services where such supply takes place in the course of import of goods or services or export of goods or services or both out of the territory of India. Hence, since purchase of goods by DFS remains in customs area and the sale from DFS also takes place outside the Customs Frontiers of India, no tax can be levied on the said transactions.
  • It was also held that CBIC itself had clarified vide circular dated 29th May, 2018 that the Advance Ruling given in the case of Rod Retail Private Limited is not applicable to DFS and the dispensation allowed to DFS will not be effected in any manner as the applicant in advance ruling was duty paid shop and not duty free shop. 
  • Reliance was also placed on various judgments delivered by various High Courts by following the Supreme Court decision stated above.
  • With effect from 1st February, 2019, in view of the CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018, supply of warehouse goods before clearance for home consumption have been notified/classified as activities or transactions which shall not be treated as a supply of goods. Accordingly, effective from 1st February, 2019, sale of goods from arrival DFS falls under Entry 8(a) of Schedule III to CGST/SGST Act; and further, Section 17(2) of the CGST Act is amended according to which reversal of ITC pertaining to activity specified in Schedule-III is not required. Accordingly, DFS is eligible to claim ITC. Once this ITC is eligible, refund of entire ITC pertaining to departure and arrival is eligible, based on formula of refund prescribed in Rule 89. It was also held that since DFS located in other States are getting refund of input tax credit, there cannot be discrimination against the DFS located in the State of Maharashtra.
 
  • As regards levy of IGST on sales made to arriving passengers, it was held that arriving passenger’s baggage is exempt from the integrated tax in view of the Customs Notification No. 43/2017-Cus., dated 30th June, 2017 and IGST Notification No. 2/2017-IGST (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017. In view of the above exemption read with the duty free allowance available under the Baggage Rules applicable to arriving passengers, neither customs duty (upto the permitted baggage allowance) nor IGST is levied on such goods. Such import of goods by arriving passengers across custom frontier as passenger baggage is therefore an exempt supply under the GST, hence no IGST is payable by either the DFS on its imports, or on supply to arriving passengers. The arriving passengers are also not required to pay any IGST on crossing the custom frontiers, in view of the above exemption read with the duty free allowance under the Baggage Rules.
 
Hence, on the basis of above reasoning, it was concluded that the DFS is neither required to pay GST on procuring goods from foreign countries nor liable to pay GST on sale of goods to arriving/departing passengers. Furthermore, DFS is also eligible to claim ITC of various services procured by it and claim refund of the same under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017.
 
The above landmark decision confirms that High Courts do intervene in deserving cases inspite of the fact that alternate remedy is available to the applicant. It is pertinent to mention that consequent to amendment in Schedule III to the CGST Act, 2017, the government issued notification no. 11/2019-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 29.06.2019 wherein exemption has been granted from levy of IGST to supply of goods by a retail outlet established in the departure area of an international airport, beyond immigration counters, to an outgoing international tourist which is applicable with effect from 01.07.2019. 
This is only for educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ and follow us on twitter https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com