Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS

GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS
GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS
 
The Duty Free Shops (DFS) located at Airports have been showered with various exemptions from levy of taxes so that they are internationally competitive with other DFS and also to promote foreign trade and conservation of foreign exchange. With the introduction of GST regime, a big question that remained unanswered was whether IGST is leviable on the procurement of goods from foreign countries by DFS and sale of goods by DFS to international passengers travelling abroad. This question was raised by M/s Rod Retail Pvt. Ltd. [2018 (12) G.S.T.L. 206 (A.A.R.-GST)] before the Delhi Authority for Advance Ruling under GST wherein it was ruled that under GST regime, the scenario has changed and export under GST takes place only when goods are taken out to a place outside India. Hence, export takes place only when goods cross territorial waters/airspace of India and not merely on crossing the customs barriers. As DFSs are established beyond customs Frontiers but are not located outside India, sales of goods by DFS at airport do not qualify as export and IGST is payable on sale of goods by DFS. However, this issue was once again litigated by way of writ petition filed in Bombay High Court reported as Sandeep Patil Versus Union of India [2019 (31) G.S.T.L. 398 (Bom.)]. The present update seeks to discuss the reasoning adopted by the Hon’ble High Court as regards applicability of IGST on sale of goods by duty free shops (DFS). The issue regarding admissibility of input tax credit on various services procured by DFS and eligibility to claim refund of the same under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017 was also examined by this writ petition. 
The observations made in this case are summarized as follows:-
  1. DFSs are located in customs station as defined in Section 2(13) of the Customs Act, 1962. DFS are issued a special warehouse licence under Section 58A of the Customs Act and are part of ‘custom area’ as defined in the Customs Act.
 
  1. Whenever goods are imported by DFS, bill of entry for warehousing is being filed under section 46 of the Customs Act and also executes a bond after which ‘space certificate’ is issued for physical storage of goods into customs bonded warehouse. When the goods move from special warehouse to DFS, the same are moved under physical supervision of proper officer. The imported goods continue to be within the custom area and are not removed for home consumption as provided for under Section 68 of the Customs Act, which is by filing an ex-bond bill of entry for clearance for home consumption on payment of duty. It, therefore, follows that all sales and supplies take place from or within the custom area.
 
  1. Invoice issued by DFS at the time of sale of goods to outbound passengers, which is signed by outbound passenger and cashier clearly mentions that supply of duty free goods is with condition that passenger will not consume goods until he lands at the final destination outside India, and further that passenger shall become owner of goods only upon reaching the final destination. It is also ensured that if the passenger is not able to board the aircraft leaving India, the goods will have to be returned back to DFS whereupon the sale is declared void and refund is given to the passenger.
 
  1. DFS also procures various input services such as rent, warehouse and other charges, maintenance services, CHA Services, Professional Services, etc., which are used in the course or in furtherance of its business. Hence, credit of entire GST paid on input services is available to DFS under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act and refund of the same can be claimed under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules as supplies made by DFS to outbound passengers is to be considered as export.
 
Reasoning adopted by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court:-
 
  • The decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in India Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. Through Hotel Ashokav. CCT, [(2012) 3 SCC 204 = 2012 (276) E.L.T. 433(S.C.)]in the matter of DFSs at international airport at Bengaluru was followed wherein it was confirmed that when goods are kept in bonded warehouses, it cannot be said that they have crossed the Customs Frontiers and so the goods sold before importation are not liable to tax. The above reasoning adopted by referring the provisions of Article 286 of the Constitution which mentions that State has no right to tax supply of goods or services where such supply takes place in the course of import of goods or services or export of goods or services or both out of the territory of India. Hence, since purchase of goods by DFS remains in customs area and the sale from DFS also takes place outside the Customs Frontiers of India, no tax can be levied on the said transactions.
  • It was also held that CBIC itself had clarified vide circular dated 29th May, 2018 that the Advance Ruling given in the case of Rod Retail Private Limited is not applicable to DFS and the dispensation allowed to DFS will not be effected in any manner as the applicant in advance ruling was duty paid shop and not duty free shop. 
  • Reliance was also placed on various judgments delivered by various High Courts by following the Supreme Court decision stated above.
  • With effect from 1st February, 2019, in view of the CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018, supply of warehouse goods before clearance for home consumption have been notified/classified as activities or transactions which shall not be treated as a supply of goods. Accordingly, effective from 1st February, 2019, sale of goods from arrival DFS falls under Entry 8(a) of Schedule III to CGST/SGST Act; and further, Section 17(2) of the CGST Act is amended according to which reversal of ITC pertaining to activity specified in Schedule-III is not required. Accordingly, DFS is eligible to claim ITC. Once this ITC is eligible, refund of entire ITC pertaining to departure and arrival is eligible, based on formula of refund prescribed in Rule 89. It was also held that since DFS located in other States are getting refund of input tax credit, there cannot be discrimination against the DFS located in the State of Maharashtra.
 
  • As regards levy of IGST on sales made to arriving passengers, it was held that arriving passenger’s baggage is exempt from the integrated tax in view of the Customs Notification No. 43/2017-Cus., dated 30th June, 2017 and IGST Notification No. 2/2017-IGST (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017. In view of the above exemption read with the duty free allowance available under the Baggage Rules applicable to arriving passengers, neither customs duty (upto the permitted baggage allowance) nor IGST is levied on such goods. Such import of goods by arriving passengers across custom frontier as passenger baggage is therefore an exempt supply under the GST, hence no IGST is payable by either the DFS on its imports, or on supply to arriving passengers. The arriving passengers are also not required to pay any IGST on crossing the custom frontiers, in view of the above exemption read with the duty free allowance under the Baggage Rules.
 
Hence, on the basis of above reasoning, it was concluded that the DFS is neither required to pay GST on procuring goods from foreign countries nor liable to pay GST on sale of goods to arriving/departing passengers. Furthermore, DFS is also eligible to claim ITC of various services procured by it and claim refund of the same under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017.
 
The above landmark decision confirms that High Courts do intervene in deserving cases inspite of the fact that alternate remedy is available to the applicant. It is pertinent to mention that consequent to amendment in Schedule III to the CGST Act, 2017, the government issued notification no. 11/2019-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 29.06.2019 wherein exemption has been granted from levy of IGST to supply of goods by a retail outlet established in the departure area of an international airport, beyond immigration counters, to an outgoing international tourist which is applicable with effect from 01.07.2019. 
This is only for educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ and follow us on twitter https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com