Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS

GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS
GST UPDATE ON LEVIABILITY OF IGST ON DUTY FREE SHOPS
 
The Duty Free Shops (DFS) located at Airports have been showered with various exemptions from levy of taxes so that they are internationally competitive with other DFS and also to promote foreign trade and conservation of foreign exchange. With the introduction of GST regime, a big question that remained unanswered was whether IGST is leviable on the procurement of goods from foreign countries by DFS and sale of goods by DFS to international passengers travelling abroad. This question was raised by M/s Rod Retail Pvt. Ltd. [2018 (12) G.S.T.L. 206 (A.A.R.-GST)] before the Delhi Authority for Advance Ruling under GST wherein it was ruled that under GST regime, the scenario has changed and export under GST takes place only when goods are taken out to a place outside India. Hence, export takes place only when goods cross territorial waters/airspace of India and not merely on crossing the customs barriers. As DFSs are established beyond customs Frontiers but are not located outside India, sales of goods by DFS at airport do not qualify as export and IGST is payable on sale of goods by DFS. However, this issue was once again litigated by way of writ petition filed in Bombay High Court reported as Sandeep Patil Versus Union of India [2019 (31) G.S.T.L. 398 (Bom.)]. The present update seeks to discuss the reasoning adopted by the Hon’ble High Court as regards applicability of IGST on sale of goods by duty free shops (DFS). The issue regarding admissibility of input tax credit on various services procured by DFS and eligibility to claim refund of the same under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017 was also examined by this writ petition. 
The observations made in this case are summarized as follows:-
  1. DFSs are located in customs station as defined in Section 2(13) of the Customs Act, 1962. DFS are issued a special warehouse licence under Section 58A of the Customs Act and are part of ‘custom area’ as defined in the Customs Act.
 
  1. Whenever goods are imported by DFS, bill of entry for warehousing is being filed under section 46 of the Customs Act and also executes a bond after which ‘space certificate’ is issued for physical storage of goods into customs bonded warehouse. When the goods move from special warehouse to DFS, the same are moved under physical supervision of proper officer. The imported goods continue to be within the custom area and are not removed for home consumption as provided for under Section 68 of the Customs Act, which is by filing an ex-bond bill of entry for clearance for home consumption on payment of duty. It, therefore, follows that all sales and supplies take place from or within the custom area.
 
  1. Invoice issued by DFS at the time of sale of goods to outbound passengers, which is signed by outbound passenger and cashier clearly mentions that supply of duty free goods is with condition that passenger will not consume goods until he lands at the final destination outside India, and further that passenger shall become owner of goods only upon reaching the final destination. It is also ensured that if the passenger is not able to board the aircraft leaving India, the goods will have to be returned back to DFS whereupon the sale is declared void and refund is given to the passenger.
 
  1. DFS also procures various input services such as rent, warehouse and other charges, maintenance services, CHA Services, Professional Services, etc., which are used in the course or in furtherance of its business. Hence, credit of entire GST paid on input services is available to DFS under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act and refund of the same can be claimed under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules as supplies made by DFS to outbound passengers is to be considered as export.
 
Reasoning adopted by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court:-
 
  • The decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in India Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. Through Hotel Ashokav. CCT, [(2012) 3 SCC 204 = 2012 (276) E.L.T. 433(S.C.)]in the matter of DFSs at international airport at Bengaluru was followed wherein it was confirmed that when goods are kept in bonded warehouses, it cannot be said that they have crossed the Customs Frontiers and so the goods sold before importation are not liable to tax. The above reasoning adopted by referring the provisions of Article 286 of the Constitution which mentions that State has no right to tax supply of goods or services where such supply takes place in the course of import of goods or services or export of goods or services or both out of the territory of India. Hence, since purchase of goods by DFS remains in customs area and the sale from DFS also takes place outside the Customs Frontiers of India, no tax can be levied on the said transactions.
  • It was also held that CBIC itself had clarified vide circular dated 29th May, 2018 that the Advance Ruling given in the case of Rod Retail Private Limited is not applicable to DFS and the dispensation allowed to DFS will not be effected in any manner as the applicant in advance ruling was duty paid shop and not duty free shop. 
  • Reliance was also placed on various judgments delivered by various High Courts by following the Supreme Court decision stated above.
  • With effect from 1st February, 2019, in view of the CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018, supply of warehouse goods before clearance for home consumption have been notified/classified as activities or transactions which shall not be treated as a supply of goods. Accordingly, effective from 1st February, 2019, sale of goods from arrival DFS falls under Entry 8(a) of Schedule III to CGST/SGST Act; and further, Section 17(2) of the CGST Act is amended according to which reversal of ITC pertaining to activity specified in Schedule-III is not required. Accordingly, DFS is eligible to claim ITC. Once this ITC is eligible, refund of entire ITC pertaining to departure and arrival is eligible, based on formula of refund prescribed in Rule 89. It was also held that since DFS located in other States are getting refund of input tax credit, there cannot be discrimination against the DFS located in the State of Maharashtra.
 
  • As regards levy of IGST on sales made to arriving passengers, it was held that arriving passenger’s baggage is exempt from the integrated tax in view of the Customs Notification No. 43/2017-Cus., dated 30th June, 2017 and IGST Notification No. 2/2017-IGST (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017. In view of the above exemption read with the duty free allowance available under the Baggage Rules applicable to arriving passengers, neither customs duty (upto the permitted baggage allowance) nor IGST is levied on such goods. Such import of goods by arriving passengers across custom frontier as passenger baggage is therefore an exempt supply under the GST, hence no IGST is payable by either the DFS on its imports, or on supply to arriving passengers. The arriving passengers are also not required to pay any IGST on crossing the custom frontiers, in view of the above exemption read with the duty free allowance under the Baggage Rules.
 
Hence, on the basis of above reasoning, it was concluded that the DFS is neither required to pay GST on procuring goods from foreign countries nor liable to pay GST on sale of goods to arriving/departing passengers. Furthermore, DFS is also eligible to claim ITC of various services procured by it and claim refund of the same under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017.
 
The above landmark decision confirms that High Courts do intervene in deserving cases inspite of the fact that alternate remedy is available to the applicant. It is pertinent to mention that consequent to amendment in Schedule III to the CGST Act, 2017, the government issued notification no. 11/2019-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 29.06.2019 wherein exemption has been granted from levy of IGST to supply of goods by a retail outlet established in the departure area of an international airport, beyond immigration counters, to an outgoing international tourist which is applicable with effect from 01.07.2019. 
This is only for educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ and follow us on twitter https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com