Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON LACK OF PROVISIONS FOR RECOVERY OF TRANSITIONAL CREDIT 60/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON LACK OF PROVISIONS FOR RECOVERY OF TRANSITIONAL CREDIT 60/2020-21

 

The saga of carry forward of erstwhile credit into the GST regime is being still continued, even at the time when we will be celebrating 3rd Anniversary of GST in the coming month. The transition of credit pertaining to erstwhile laws has not been smooth enough and the inability to file prescribed TRAN-1 within the stipulated time period is being disputed with relief provided by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. However, the dispute has not end in light of the retrospective amendment made in section 140 and the decision of Delhi High Court being challenged before the Supreme Court. Nonetheless, in the present update we will discuss the provisions that will be invoked by the revenue authorities in case where wrong credit has been availed as “transitional credit” under the GST regime.

 

Before discussing the provisions of section 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017, it is pertinent to discuss certain provisions relating to transitional credit. The first and foremost question is whether the “transitional credit” availed by the assessees under GST regime is to be construed as “input tax credit” as the procedural mechanism available on the GST portal merges the erstwhile credit of Central Excise and Service Tax as “Central Tax” and the VAT credit as “State Tax” and the transitional credit becomes the part of the common pool of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger on the GST portal. It is observed that in GST Law, it is possible that utilities available on GST portal and the provisions of Act are not in consonance with each other and so reference is required to be made to the definition of input tax credit as stated in section 2(63)  of the CGST Act, 2017 according to which “input tax credit” means the credit of input tax. Furthermore, the term “input tax” is defined in section 2(62) of the CGST Act, 2017 as follows:-

(62) “input tax” in relation to a registered person, means the central tax, State tax, integrated tax or Union territory tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both made to him and includes—

 

(a) the integrated goods and services tax charged on import of goods;

(b) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9;

(c) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 5 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act;

(d) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9 of the respective State Goods and Services Tax Act; or

(e) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 7 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act,

 

but does not include the tax paid under the composition levy;

 

On perusal of the above definition, it is clear that transitional credit is not to be considered as “input tax credit” under GST Law. In this context, in order to further substantiate this point, reference may be made to clarification issued vide Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019 wherein it has been clarified in paragraph no. 50 that the transitional credit pertains to duties and taxes paid under the existing laws and so the same cannot be said to have availed during the relevant period so as to consider it as part of “Net ITC” and so no refund of unutilised transitional credit is admissible under section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.

 

Therefore, it is clear that transitional credit is not “input tax credit” as per GST Law. Now, the question arises is whether the provisions of section 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 can be invoked for demanding wrongly availed transitional credit? In this respect, it is worth noting that the provisions of section 73/74 pertain to determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised. It is submitted that when the transitional credit is not considered as “input tax credit” under GST Law, then whether the provisions of section 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 can be invoked for demanding and recovering wrongly availed transitional credit? If answer is No, then whether the show cause notice for demanding wrongly availed transitional credit will be issued under erstwhile laws? Well, when the credit of erstwhile regime merges into the common pool of CGST and SGST in the electronic credit ledger after filing TRAN-1 and assumes the character of CGST and SGST, issuance of show cause notice under erstwhile laws would also be challenging task for the revenue authorities as utilisation of such wrongly availed transitional credit is in GST regime. One may argue that revenue authorities may certainly raise demand for short payment of tax if the said wrongly availed transitional credit has been utilised.

In this context, reference is also made to Rule 121 of the CGST Rules, 2017, which states that the transitional credit may be verified and proceedings under section 73 or section 74 shall be initiated in respect of any credit wrongly availed, whether wholly or partly. It is pertinent to mention that neither the section 73/74 nor the transitional provisions contained from section 139 to 142, expressly indicate that the wrongly availed transitional credit will be demanded and recovered under section 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, in the absence of statuary provisions in the Act for recovery provisions pertaining to transitional credit when the said credit is not covered by the term “input tax credit”, the viability of Rule 121 is certainly doubted. This is for the reason that the Rules are accessories to any law and provisions of Rule cannot go beyond the statutory provisions stated in any Law.  In our opinion, perhaps, this is drafting lacunae in section 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 which may be corrected by resorting to retrospective amendment.


This is solely for educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com