Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-

GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-
GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-
 
In earlier update, we have discussed about the taxability of land developed into plots for sale. In the present update, we seek to discuss the provision regarding input tax credit availability to the landowner with respect to notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019.
Before proceeding to discuss the issue, it is imperative to observe the provisions contained as regards the definition of ‘promoter’ given under section 2(zk) of the RERA which reads as follows:-
a. a person who constructs or causes to be constructed an independent building or a building consisting of apartments, or converts an existing building or a part thereof into apartments, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments to other persons and includes his assignees; or
b. a person who develops the land into a project, whether or not the person also constructs structures on any of the plots, for the purpose of selling to other persons all or some of the plots in the said project, whether with or without structures thereon; or
c. any development authority or any other public body in respect of allottees of—
  • Buildings or apartments, as the case may be, constructed by such authority or body on lands owned by them or placed at their disposal by the Government; or
  • Plots owned by such authority or body or placed at their disposal by the Government, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments or plots; or
d. An apex State level co-operative housing finance society and a primary co operative housing society which constructs apartments or buildings for its Members or in respect of the allottees of such apartments or buildings; or
e. Any other person who acts himself as a builder, coloniser, contractor, developer, estate developer or by any other name or claims to be acting as the holder of a power of attorney from the owner of the land on which the building or apartment is constructed or plot is developed for sale; or
f. Such other person who constructs any building or apartment for sale to the general public.
Explanation—For the purposes of this clause, where the person who constructs or converts a building into apartments or develops a plot for sale and the persons who sell apartments or plots are different persons, both of them shall be deemed to be the promotersand shall be jointly liable as such for the functions and responsibilities specified, under this Act or the rules and regulations made thereunder;”
The above cited definition is wide enough to consider ‘landowner’ in a Joint Development Agreement as promoter. Consequently, the landowner is also eligible to claim the benefit of concessional GST rate applicable to the developer. Now, the question arises is whether the developer and landowner can exercise different options for paying GST with respect to ongoing projects like developer paying tax at new concessional rate and the landowner paying tax at old rates? Well, the answer is ‘Yes’ because landowner is considered as promoter under RERA which is also squarely applicable to the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. However, the practical difficulties associated with opting different option by the landowner and developer will be discussed in suceeding paragraphs.
According to Fourth Proviso to the conditions stated in the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, the clause (ii) allows the landowner to avail input tax credit of the tax charged by the developer provided the landowner sells the apartments before completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier and pays tax not less than that charged by the developer. Furthermore, as discussed in the preceding paragraph that there is no restriction on landowner as regards payment of tax under same scheme as that opted by the developer. Therefore, there may be four situations:-
 
 
Situation Number Option Exercised by Developer Option Exercised by the Landowner Whether ITC admissible to the landowner?
1. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier. There is exception for the landowner for availing credit in the notification if tax paid is equal to or more than the tax charged by the developer. However, since in this case, the tax paid by the landowner is not equal to/more than the tax charged by the developer, input tax credit cannot be taken by landowner.
2. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier.
3. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier.
4. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier. There is exception for the landowner for availing credit if tax paid is equal to or more than the tax charged by the developer. Since, the tax charged by the landowner is equal to that charged by the developer, input tax credit may be availed by the landowner.
 
On the basis of above table, it is concluded that the landowner is eligible to avail input tax credit in situation number 2, 3 and 4 only. The landowner is not eligible to avail input tax credit in situation no. 1 and so we can conclude that the situation no. 1 will not be feasible to be adopted in practical life. This is for the reason that the landowner will be debarred from availing input tax credit in situation no. 1.
 
Moving the analysis further, it is worth noting that first proviso in the conditions to the notification no.03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, states that the tax shall be paid in cash by debiting electronic cash ledger only. It is submitted that this condition is applicable for all promoters including landowner and so it can be concluded that although the fourth proviso entitles landowner to avail input tax credit of the tax charged by the developer, there is restriction to utilise the said credit in discharging the tax liability under the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. One can say that the provision allowing input tax credit to the landowner is not lucrative in real sense as even in situation no. 4, landowner will have to discharge GST in cash. In our opinion, the restriction as regards payment of tax in cash should be removed for landowner if he has opted to pay tax under notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, so that the true purpose of allowing the facility of input tax credit can be achieved because availability of input tax credit without facility to utilise is not facility in real sense.                       
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
                                          
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com