Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-

GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-
GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-
 
In earlier update, we have discussed about the taxability of land developed into plots for sale. In the present update, we seek to discuss the provision regarding input tax credit availability to the landowner with respect to notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019.
Before proceeding to discuss the issue, it is imperative to observe the provisions contained as regards the definition of ‘promoter’ given under section 2(zk) of the RERA which reads as follows:-
a. a person who constructs or causes to be constructed an independent building or a building consisting of apartments, or converts an existing building or a part thereof into apartments, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments to other persons and includes his assignees; or
b. a person who develops the land into a project, whether or not the person also constructs structures on any of the plots, for the purpose of selling to other persons all or some of the plots in the said project, whether with or without structures thereon; or
c. any development authority or any other public body in respect of allottees of—
  • Buildings or apartments, as the case may be, constructed by such authority or body on lands owned by them or placed at their disposal by the Government; or
  • Plots owned by such authority or body or placed at their disposal by the Government, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments or plots; or
d. An apex State level co-operative housing finance society and a primary co operative housing society which constructs apartments or buildings for its Members or in respect of the allottees of such apartments or buildings; or
e. Any other person who acts himself as a builder, coloniser, contractor, developer, estate developer or by any other name or claims to be acting as the holder of a power of attorney from the owner of the land on which the building or apartment is constructed or plot is developed for sale; or
f. Such other person who constructs any building or apartment for sale to the general public.
Explanation—For the purposes of this clause, where the person who constructs or converts a building into apartments or develops a plot for sale and the persons who sell apartments or plots are different persons, both of them shall be deemed to be the promotersand shall be jointly liable as such for the functions and responsibilities specified, under this Act or the rules and regulations made thereunder;”
The above cited definition is wide enough to consider ‘landowner’ in a Joint Development Agreement as promoter. Consequently, the landowner is also eligible to claim the benefit of concessional GST rate applicable to the developer. Now, the question arises is whether the developer and landowner can exercise different options for paying GST with respect to ongoing projects like developer paying tax at new concessional rate and the landowner paying tax at old rates? Well, the answer is ‘Yes’ because landowner is considered as promoter under RERA which is also squarely applicable to the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. However, the practical difficulties associated with opting different option by the landowner and developer will be discussed in suceeding paragraphs.
According to Fourth Proviso to the conditions stated in the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, the clause (ii) allows the landowner to avail input tax credit of the tax charged by the developer provided the landowner sells the apartments before completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier and pays tax not less than that charged by the developer. Furthermore, as discussed in the preceding paragraph that there is no restriction on landowner as regards payment of tax under same scheme as that opted by the developer. Therefore, there may be four situations:-
 
 
Situation Number Option Exercised by Developer Option Exercised by the Landowner Whether ITC admissible to the landowner?
1. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier. There is exception for the landowner for availing credit in the notification if tax paid is equal to or more than the tax charged by the developer. However, since in this case, the tax paid by the landowner is not equal to/more than the tax charged by the developer, input tax credit cannot be taken by landowner.
2. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier.
3. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier.
4. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier. There is exception for the landowner for availing credit if tax paid is equal to or more than the tax charged by the developer. Since, the tax charged by the landowner is equal to that charged by the developer, input tax credit may be availed by the landowner.
 
On the basis of above table, it is concluded that the landowner is eligible to avail input tax credit in situation number 2, 3 and 4 only. The landowner is not eligible to avail input tax credit in situation no. 1 and so we can conclude that the situation no. 1 will not be feasible to be adopted in practical life. This is for the reason that the landowner will be debarred from availing input tax credit in situation no. 1.
 
Moving the analysis further, it is worth noting that first proviso in the conditions to the notification no.03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, states that the tax shall be paid in cash by debiting electronic cash ledger only. It is submitted that this condition is applicable for all promoters including landowner and so it can be concluded that although the fourth proviso entitles landowner to avail input tax credit of the tax charged by the developer, there is restriction to utilise the said credit in discharging the tax liability under the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. One can say that the provision allowing input tax credit to the landowner is not lucrative in real sense as even in situation no. 4, landowner will have to discharge GST in cash. In our opinion, the restriction as regards payment of tax in cash should be removed for landowner if he has opted to pay tax under notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, so that the true purpose of allowing the facility of input tax credit can be achieved because availability of input tax credit without facility to utilise is not facility in real sense.                       
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
                                          
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com