Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-

GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-
GST UPDATE ON ITC AVAILABILITY TO LANDOWNER PART-9:-
 
In earlier update, we have discussed about the taxability of land developed into plots for sale. In the present update, we seek to discuss the provision regarding input tax credit availability to the landowner with respect to notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019.
Before proceeding to discuss the issue, it is imperative to observe the provisions contained as regards the definition of ‘promoter’ given under section 2(zk) of the RERA which reads as follows:-
a. a person who constructs or causes to be constructed an independent building or a building consisting of apartments, or converts an existing building or a part thereof into apartments, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments to other persons and includes his assignees; or
b. a person who develops the land into a project, whether or not the person also constructs structures on any of the plots, for the purpose of selling to other persons all or some of the plots in the said project, whether with or without structures thereon; or
c. any development authority or any other public body in respect of allottees of—
  • Buildings or apartments, as the case may be, constructed by such authority or body on lands owned by them or placed at their disposal by the Government; or
  • Plots owned by such authority or body or placed at their disposal by the Government, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments or plots; or
d. An apex State level co-operative housing finance society and a primary co operative housing society which constructs apartments or buildings for its Members or in respect of the allottees of such apartments or buildings; or
e. Any other person who acts himself as a builder, coloniser, contractor, developer, estate developer or by any other name or claims to be acting as the holder of a power of attorney from the owner of the land on which the building or apartment is constructed or plot is developed for sale; or
f. Such other person who constructs any building or apartment for sale to the general public.
Explanation—For the purposes of this clause, where the person who constructs or converts a building into apartments or develops a plot for sale and the persons who sell apartments or plots are different persons, both of them shall be deemed to be the promotersand shall be jointly liable as such for the functions and responsibilities specified, under this Act or the rules and regulations made thereunder;”
The above cited definition is wide enough to consider ‘landowner’ in a Joint Development Agreement as promoter. Consequently, the landowner is also eligible to claim the benefit of concessional GST rate applicable to the developer. Now, the question arises is whether the developer and landowner can exercise different options for paying GST with respect to ongoing projects like developer paying tax at new concessional rate and the landowner paying tax at old rates? Well, the answer is ‘Yes’ because landowner is considered as promoter under RERA which is also squarely applicable to the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. However, the practical difficulties associated with opting different option by the landowner and developer will be discussed in suceeding paragraphs.
According to Fourth Proviso to the conditions stated in the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, the clause (ii) allows the landowner to avail input tax credit of the tax charged by the developer provided the landowner sells the apartments before completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier and pays tax not less than that charged by the developer. Furthermore, as discussed in the preceding paragraph that there is no restriction on landowner as regards payment of tax under same scheme as that opted by the developer. Therefore, there may be four situations:-
 
 
Situation Number Option Exercised by Developer Option Exercised by the Landowner Whether ITC admissible to the landowner?
1. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier. There is exception for the landowner for availing credit in the notification if tax paid is equal to or more than the tax charged by the developer. However, since in this case, the tax paid by the landowner is not equal to/more than the tax charged by the developer, input tax credit cannot be taken by landowner.
2. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier.
3. Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Pay GST at old rates 18%/12% with one third deduction of land value along with input tax credit facility Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier.
4. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Pay GST at new concessional rates of 1%/5% without facility of ITC. Yes, if the apartments are sold prior to completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier. There is exception for the landowner for availing credit if tax paid is equal to or more than the tax charged by the developer. Since, the tax charged by the landowner is equal to that charged by the developer, input tax credit may be availed by the landowner.
 
On the basis of above table, it is concluded that the landowner is eligible to avail input tax credit in situation number 2, 3 and 4 only. The landowner is not eligible to avail input tax credit in situation no. 1 and so we can conclude that the situation no. 1 will not be feasible to be adopted in practical life. This is for the reason that the landowner will be debarred from availing input tax credit in situation no. 1.
 
Moving the analysis further, it is worth noting that first proviso in the conditions to the notification no.03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, states that the tax shall be paid in cash by debiting electronic cash ledger only. It is submitted that this condition is applicable for all promoters including landowner and so it can be concluded that although the fourth proviso entitles landowner to avail input tax credit of the tax charged by the developer, there is restriction to utilise the said credit in discharging the tax liability under the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. One can say that the provision allowing input tax credit to the landowner is not lucrative in real sense as even in situation no. 4, landowner will have to discharge GST in cash. In our opinion, the restriction as regards payment of tax in cash should be removed for landowner if he has opted to pay tax under notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, so that the true purpose of allowing the facility of input tax credit can be achieved because availability of input tax credit without facility to utilise is not facility in real sense.                       
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
                                          
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com