Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Issues in Reconciliation Statement- Part 11

GST Update on Issues in Reconciliation Statement- Part 11

 
In our today’s update we are discussing on the serial no. 5M of the Reconciliation Statement  pertaining to adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder. Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 pertains to valuation of goods under GST and it specifies lot of inclusions and exclusions from the value of supply. Say for example, if we talk of inclusions, it is stated that any amount that supplier is liable to pay in relation to supply but which has been incurred by the recipeint of supply and not included in the price actually paid or payable for the goods is to be included in the value of supply. To illustrate, if cost of moulds was to be incurred by the supplier but if the same is supplied by the recipeint, the same needs to be included in the value of supply. This will be a point of difference in the turnover recorded in the annual financial statements and that reflected in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. The turnover in the GST returns would be higher as it includes cost of moulds supplied by the recipient and so while preparing reconciliation statement, the cost of moulds needs to be added to the turnover of audited annual financial statements so as to arrive at the turnover as per GST returns filed by the assessee. Likewise, GST is also required to be paid on interest or penalty recovered for delayed payment of consideration for supply by the supplier but the said amount is not included in the turnover of annual audited financial statements. Therefore, while preparing the reconciliation statement, the amount of interest on delayed payment of consideration needs to be added so that the turnover as per GST returns is arrived at.
 
Similarly, the section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 also specifies that the value of supply shall not include any discount which is mentioned on the invoice and is given as per agreement before or at the time of making supply. In nutshell, only the discounts known at the time of entering into agreement to supply goods or services are allowed as deduction from the value of supply. However, the discounts allowed by way of issuance of credit notes but not known at the time of making supply would not be included in the adjustment under this serial 5M and rather would be part of 5E/5J of reconciliation. Furthermore, discounts that are permissible under GST Law and given by way of issuance of credit notes will also be reflected under this serial 5M as adjustment by way of deduction in the value of supply under section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017.
 
It is pertinent to mention here that the adjustment under serial no. 5M would also include various goods/services valued as per Rule 27 to 35 of the CGST Rules, 2017 wherein an altogether different mechanism for valuation has been adopted. Say for example, as per Rule 32(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the value of supply of services in relation to booking of tickets for travel by air provided by an air travel agent shall be deemed to be amount calculated at the rate of five per cent of the basic fare in case of domestic bookings, and at the rate of ten per cent of the basic fare in case of international bookings of passage for travel by air. In such a situation, suitable adjustment needs to be done to arrive at value of supply as per GST returns. To illustrate, if the commission income booked by a travel agent in his audited annual financial statements is Rs. 7,00,000/- but the value of basic fare of tickets booked for domestic flights is Rs. 30,00,000/- and the value of basic fare of tickets booked for international flights is 50,00,000/-. The value of supply as per GST returns is Rs. 6,50,000/- (30,00,000* 5% + 50,00,000 * 10%). Hence, a deduction of Rs. 50,000/- would be made under serial no. 5M to arrive at the figure of annual audited financial statements. The adjustment in such scenario will definitely be a tedious task for the auditor.
It is also worth discussing that as per Rule 32(5) of the CGST Rules, value of supply in case of person dealing in buying and selling of second hand goods shall be difference between the selling price and purchase price and where such supply is negative, it shall be ignored. Consequently, in GST regime, the valuation is dependent on profit earned whereas the audited financial statements will include the turnover on sale of second hand goods as a whole. The adjustment to be made under serial no. 5M would really be difficult for the auditor. 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com