Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Issues in Reconciliation Statement- Part 10

GST Update on Issues in Reconciliation Statement- Part 10
In our today’s update we are discussing on the serial no. 5N pertaining to adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations. We submit that it is possible that there are differences due to foreign exchange fluctuations in the turnover recorded in the books of accounts and that reflected in the return filed by the assessee. This is for the reason that while recording export sales in the annual financial statements, the guidelines prescribed in AS-11 are followed and the rate of exchange prescribed by RBI is considered whereas while issuing GST invoice and in the export documents like shipping bill, the exchange rate prescribed by the CBIC from time to time is being considered. Consequently, for recording export sales, there are two invoices maintained by assessees, one issued under GST laws being GST invoice wherein CBIC exchange rate is used and the other issued for accounting purpose which considers the rate of exchange prescribed by RBI on the date of bill of lading. Consequently, there is difference in the turnover of export sales as per annual financial statements and as per GST returns due to difference in the rate of exchange used for recording the transaction. It is also worth noting that certain assessees use only one rate of exchange for booking export sales being the rate prescribed by CBIC and in such cases, this difference may not be there. 
Continuing further, since the export sales are booked at a different rate than the date of realisation of export proceeds, there will again be a difference on account of foreign exchange fluctuation on the date of realisation of export proceeds. The gain or loss arising on account of realisation of export proceeds will be transferred to Profit and Loss Account. Now, additional adjustment on account of profit or loss on account of foreign exchange fluctuation will be required to be done if the Turnover as per audited financial statements as stated in 5A of the Reconciliation includes gain on account of foreign exchange fluctuation. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that there are two opinions as regards turnover to be taken in 5A of the Reconciliation Statement. One view (also suggested by Technical Guide issued by ICAI) is that turnover of 5A will include all indirect incomes such as gain on account of foreign exchange, gain on sale of asset etc. Consequently, if the turnover of 5A includes forex gain, adjustment on account of profit on foreign exchange fluctuation will be additionally done in 5N. However, if the another view is followed, which says that the turnover of 5A should be taken as stated in audited financial statements without adjusting indirect incomes, then no additional adjustment would be required to be made in 5N by the assessee. The complete analysis of adjustment on account of foreign exchange fluctuation is explained as follows:-
Exchange rate of CBIC on date of booking sales = 65
Exchange rate of RBI on date of booking sales = 68
Exchange rate of RBI on date of realisation of sales = 70
Sales made to US= 1,00,000 US $
Turnover of annual audited financial statements= Rs. 5,00,00,000/-
Gain on account of foreign exchange fluctuation= Rs. 10,00,000/-
If the assessee uses two types of exchange rates i.e. custom exchange rate for GST and other RBI rate for accounting as discussed above, then in that case, the adjustment on account of foreign exchange fluctuation in 5M would be Rs. 3,00,000/- [1,00,000* (68-65)] to be reduced from the turnover of audited financial statements on the assumption that the turnover of annual audited financial statements without adding gain has been taken under 5A. However, if the turnover of annual audited financial taken as base is including the gain on account of foreign exchange, then the total adjustment of the transaction on account of foreign exchange fluctuation shall be Rs. 5,00,000/- reduction in serial no. 5M. [3,00,000 + {1,00,000 *(70-68)}]. 
In our opinion, the turnover without any adjustment of indirect income should be taken in 5A so that less adjustments are to be done for arriving at the turnover of GSTR-9. 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com