Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON INVERTED DUTY STRUCTURE REFUND FOR TEXTILE SECTOR- PART-2

GST UPDATE ON INVERTED DUTY STRUCTURE REFUND FOR TEXTILE SECTOR- PART-2

In continuation to our earlier update, we advance our discussion as regards the provision regarding lapse of credit pertaining to the month of July, 2018 for the textile industry by virtue of notification no. 20/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018 with respect to refund of inverted duty structure on fabrics. We hereby analyse the feasibility of incorporating such restriction by the government.

We first discuss the manner of claiming refund of inverted duty structure by the assessees as given under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 which prescribes formula for claiming such refund as follows:-
Maximum Refund amount= {(Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and services) * Net ITC /Adjusted Total Turnover} –tax payable on such inverted rated supply of goods and services. 
Furthermore, as per explanation, ‘Net ITC’ means input tax credit availed on inputs during the relevant period other than the input tax credit availed for which refund is claimed under sub-rules (4A) or (4B) or both.

As it is clear from the above provisions, that the refund of inverted duty structure as per formula is admissible only with respect to input tax credit availed on inputs during the concerned period thereby meaning that the inputs availed in the month of July, 2018 would not be considered in the formula. Not only this, the refund is granted proportionately to the turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and as such, there is no need of any clause lapsing the credit of the month of July, 2018.

Moreover, even if the online application that is to be filed in form GST RFD-01 is observed, it is found that the refund is granted only of the lowest of the following:-
1. Amount as per formula
2. Balance in electronic credit ledger at the end of the tax period for which refund is claimed.
3. Balance in electronic credit ledger at the time of filing refund application.

It is submitted that since the refund admissible is the lowest of the above three amounts, the provision of lapsing the input tax credit has no relevance as such. This can be explained with the help of example-
Amount as per formula= {(20*50/100)-2}
= Rs. 8 Lakhs 
Balance of Electronic Credit Ledger during the month of July, 2018 = Rs. 40 Lakhs
Balance of Electronic Credit Ledger at the time of filing refund application during the month of August, 2018 = Rs. 58 Lakhs {40 Lakhs + 20 Lakhs – 2 Lakhs}

The amount of refund granted to assessee would be Rs. 8 Lakhs only as it is lowest. Therefore, even if the credit was not lapsed, the refund amount would have been as per formula only on the basis of credit availed during the month of August, 2018. As such, there was no need of lapsing the credit to the assessee.

Moreover, due to lapse of credit, the assessees would be at disadvantageous position than the new assessees starting business in the month of August, 2018. This is for the reason that the existing assessees would have to forgoe their credit and would have to clear their old stock by utilising credit of inputs received in August, 2018. This may also lead to two situations.
Firstly, he may have to pay duty in cash. In second situation where assessees are required to discharge their output liability by utilising credit thereby leading to deferment of refund claim on account of inverted duty structure. 
Furthermore, it is also not clear whether the credit balance of all assessees would lapse irrespective of the fact whether they claim refund of inverted duty structure or not. It is also worth mentioning that the job work units availing refund of inverted duty structure would also be at advantageous position as they will not be hit by the rigours of this notification. This is due to the fact that they are providing services of job work and are not dealing in Fabrics mentioned in the notification.

Nonetheless, the assessees will resort to manipulations in order to save their legitimately earned input tax credit and to overcome the adverse effect of this provision.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com