Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF NOTIFICATION EXTENDING DUE DATE OF FILING RETURN FOR MAY, 2020 68/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF NOTIFICATION EXTENDING DUE DATE OF FILING RETURN FOR MAY, 2020 68/2020-21
The government is trying its best to provide relaxations to the trade and industry and has lowered the rate of interest on delayed payment of taxes and has extended the due date of filing return for the month of May, 2020 vide Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020 by way of insertion of provisos.  The present update seeks to discuss the manner of amending the notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 and the issue of interest liability for the month of May, 2020.
 
The Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020 has inserted three provisos to provide the due date of filing return GSTR-3B by the assessees for the month of May, 2020. The third proviso, being inserted states that the GSTR-3B shall be furnished electronically on or before 27th June, 2020 for assessees having aggregate turnover of more than Rs. 5 Crores in the previous financial year. Thereafter, the fourth and fifth proviso prescribes the due date for assessees having aggregate turnover of upto Rs. 5 Crores in the previous financial year on the basis of States as 12th July, 2020 and 14th July, 2020. Now, coming to the notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 prescribing due dates of GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2020 to September, 2020. The said notification stated that GSTR-3B should be filed on or before the 20th day of the month suceeding such month. The first proviso and second proviso provides due date of filing GSTR-3B for assessees having aggregate turnover upto Rs. 5 Crores in the previous financial year as 22nd day/24th day of the month suceeding such month. It is also worth mentioning that the paragraph no. 2 of this notification states that every registered person furnishing GSTR-3B shall make payment of taxes, not later than the last date as specified in the first paragraph on which he is required to furnish the said return.
 
Now, the question arises is whether the last date of payment of taxes as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2 of the Notification No. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 also stands modified in light of the amendment made in the due date of filing return for the month of May, 2020 vide Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020? Well, in order to address this question, it is pertinent to refer to the meaning of paragraph vis a vis proviso in the notification.
 
As per the dictionary meaning of paragraph, it is a distinct section of a piece of writing, usually dealing with a single theme and indicated by a new line, indentation, or numbering. Now, the question arises is that whether provisos inserted can be considered to be part of the first paragraph of the notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020? If we speak of legal language, the sub-sections of a section may contain provisos and while interpreting the particular sub-section, the proviso is also considered as part of the said sub-section. The proviso is indented or started with a new line but the exception it carves is to be applied to the said sub-section. Consequently, going by the numbering distinction, as the paragraph no. 2 is separately demarcated, the provisos of first paragraph would form part of first paragraph and so the last date of payment of taxes for the month of May, 2020 would be the due dates revised vide Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020.
Therefore, in our opinion, no interest would be payable by the assessee if the taxes are paid by them after 20th June, 2020. This interpretation also holds good as when the original notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 was issued, then also, the assessees having turnover upto Rs. 5 Crores were not liable to pay interest for the period from 20th day of the suceeding month to the 22nd or 24th day of the suceeding month.
The intention of the government to extend the due date of return and payment of taxes for the month of May, 2020 is clear and obvious but the way the amendments are being carried out complicate the interpretation.

This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com , at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com