Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF NOTIFICATION EXTENDING DUE DATE OF FILING RETURN FOR MAY, 2020 68/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF NOTIFICATION EXTENDING DUE DATE OF FILING RETURN FOR MAY, 2020 68/2020-21
The government is trying its best to provide relaxations to the trade and industry and has lowered the rate of interest on delayed payment of taxes and has extended the due date of filing return for the month of May, 2020 vide Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020 by way of insertion of provisos.  The present update seeks to discuss the manner of amending the notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 and the issue of interest liability for the month of May, 2020.
 
The Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020 has inserted three provisos to provide the due date of filing return GSTR-3B by the assessees for the month of May, 2020. The third proviso, being inserted states that the GSTR-3B shall be furnished electronically on or before 27th June, 2020 for assessees having aggregate turnover of more than Rs. 5 Crores in the previous financial year. Thereafter, the fourth and fifth proviso prescribes the due date for assessees having aggregate turnover of upto Rs. 5 Crores in the previous financial year on the basis of States as 12th July, 2020 and 14th July, 2020. Now, coming to the notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 prescribing due dates of GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2020 to September, 2020. The said notification stated that GSTR-3B should be filed on or before the 20th day of the month suceeding such month. The first proviso and second proviso provides due date of filing GSTR-3B for assessees having aggregate turnover upto Rs. 5 Crores in the previous financial year as 22nd day/24th day of the month suceeding such month. It is also worth mentioning that the paragraph no. 2 of this notification states that every registered person furnishing GSTR-3B shall make payment of taxes, not later than the last date as specified in the first paragraph on which he is required to furnish the said return.
 
Now, the question arises is whether the last date of payment of taxes as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2 of the Notification No. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 also stands modified in light of the amendment made in the due date of filing return for the month of May, 2020 vide Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020? Well, in order to address this question, it is pertinent to refer to the meaning of paragraph vis a vis proviso in the notification.
 
As per the dictionary meaning of paragraph, it is a distinct section of a piece of writing, usually dealing with a single theme and indicated by a new line, indentation, or numbering. Now, the question arises is that whether provisos inserted can be considered to be part of the first paragraph of the notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020? If we speak of legal language, the sub-sections of a section may contain provisos and while interpreting the particular sub-section, the proviso is also considered as part of the said sub-section. The proviso is indented or started with a new line but the exception it carves is to be applied to the said sub-section. Consequently, going by the numbering distinction, as the paragraph no. 2 is separately demarcated, the provisos of first paragraph would form part of first paragraph and so the last date of payment of taxes for the month of May, 2020 would be the due dates revised vide Notification No. 36/2020-Central Tax dated 03.04.2020.
Therefore, in our opinion, no interest would be payable by the assessee if the taxes are paid by them after 20th June, 2020. This interpretation also holds good as when the original notification no. 29/2020-Central Tax dated 23.03.2020 was issued, then also, the assessees having turnover upto Rs. 5 Crores were not liable to pay interest for the period from 20th day of the suceeding month to the 22nd or 24th day of the suceeding month.
The intention of the government to extend the due date of return and payment of taxes for the month of May, 2020 is clear and obvious but the way the amendments are being carried out complicate the interpretation.

This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com , at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com