Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON FAQ

GST UPDATE ON FAQ’S RELEASED ON REAL ESTATE AMENDMENTS PART-10:-
GST UPDATE ON FAQ’S RELEASED ON REAL ESTATE AMENDMENTS PART-10:-
 
In earlier update, we have discussed about the provision regarding input tax
credit availability to the landowner with respect to notification no. 03/2019-
Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. In the present update, we wish to discuss
certain clarifications given vide Circular No. 354/32/2019-TRU dated
07.05.2019. Before proceeding to discuss the FAQs, it is pertinent to highlight
that the clarification has disclaimer that the answers provided do not have
force of law and the content of the notification will have precedence over the
answers given for the FAQs. It is submitted that the FAQs cover certain aspects
which are not explicitly covered by the notifications issued by the CBIC. In such
a situation, the hapless assessees are still in delimma as regards the
applicability of the clarification issued on various practical aspects. It is also
worth noting that the update seeks to discuss only important FAQs that have
practical application rather than the general FAQs mentioned in the
clarification.
 
Question no. 9 If the value of purchases as prescribed above from the
registered supplier is less than 80%, what would be the applicable GST rate on
such purchases?
Answer: Promoter has to pay GST @ 18% on reverse charge basis on all such
inward supplies (to the extent short of 80% of inward supplies from registered
supplier) except cement on which tax has to be paid (by the promoter on
reverse charge basis) at the applicable rate, which at present is 28% (CGST
14% + SGST 14%)
 
We have mentioned in our GST Update on Real Estate Part-4 that from
harmoniously reading the provisions of the notification, it appears that the
developer will be required to pay GST on cement under reverse charge at the
applicable rate of 28% on all purchase of cement from unregistered dealers
and the clause of 80% purchase from registered persons is not to be applied
for purchase of cement. It is submitted that the answer given to the question
no. 9 also indicates that the developer is required to pay GST at 18% only with
respect to shortfall in case of inputs OTHER THAN cement for which GST at the
rate of 28% will be payable on entire purchases made from unregistered
 
persons. Therefore, we can conclude that the interpretation taken by us in our
update is in conformity with the view taken by the CBIC.
 
Question no. 10 In case of new rate of 5% / 1%, whether the conditions of
payment of tax through Cash Ledger, payment of tax under RCM subject to
80% limit, non-availing of Input Tax Credit, reversal of credit, maintenance of
project wise account, reporting of ITC not availed in corresponding GSTR-3B
etc. are required to be complied mandatorily by the Developer ?
 
Answer: Yes. All the specified conditions against clause (i) to (id) of Sl. No 3 of
Notification No. 11/2017-CTR are mandatory.
 
We had discussed in our GST Update on Real Estate Part-9 that the definition
of promoter given under section 2(zk) of the RERA is wide enough to cover the
landowner within its ambit and so the landowner is also eligible to avail the
benefit of concessional rate of GST prescribed by the Notification No. 3/2019-
Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. However, as per Fourth Proviso to the
conditions stated in the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated
29.03.2019, the clause (ii) allows the landowner to avail input tax credit of the
tax charged by the developer provided the landowner sells the apartments
before completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier and pays tax
not less than that charged by the developer. We had pointed out that although
the landowner is allowed to avail the input tax credit of the tax charged by the
developer but due to restriction of discharging tax liability in cash only,
practically the landowner may not be able to avail the intended benefit of
input tax credit. As such, there is confusion as regards utilisation of input tax
credit by the landowner. However, if the FAQ no. 10 is observed, it is found
that it states that the conditions of payment of GST in cash, complying with the
condition of procurement of 80% inputs/input services from registered
supplier etc. is to be mandatorily complied by the developer. It does not
mention the term ‘promoter’ and so it can be inferred that the landowner can
pay GST by utilising input tax credit even if the option to pay GST under
notification no. 3/2019-Central Tax (Rate) is exercised. It is to be noted that
although the contents of the circular do not have legal sanctity but still they
can be basis of bonafide belief of the assessee.
 
The other important questions will be discussed in our next update.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com