Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON FAQ

GST UPDATE ON FAQ’S RELEASED ON REAL ESTATE AMENDMENTS PART-10:-
GST UPDATE ON FAQ’S RELEASED ON REAL ESTATE AMENDMENTS PART-10:-
 
In earlier update, we have discussed about the provision regarding input tax
credit availability to the landowner with respect to notification no. 03/2019-
Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. In the present update, we wish to discuss
certain clarifications given vide Circular No. 354/32/2019-TRU dated
07.05.2019. Before proceeding to discuss the FAQs, it is pertinent to highlight
that the clarification has disclaimer that the answers provided do not have
force of law and the content of the notification will have precedence over the
answers given for the FAQs. It is submitted that the FAQs cover certain aspects
which are not explicitly covered by the notifications issued by the CBIC. In such
a situation, the hapless assessees are still in delimma as regards the
applicability of the clarification issued on various practical aspects. It is also
worth noting that the update seeks to discuss only important FAQs that have
practical application rather than the general FAQs mentioned in the
clarification.
 
Question no. 9 If the value of purchases as prescribed above from the
registered supplier is less than 80%, what would be the applicable GST rate on
such purchases?
Answer: Promoter has to pay GST @ 18% on reverse charge basis on all such
inward supplies (to the extent short of 80% of inward supplies from registered
supplier) except cement on which tax has to be paid (by the promoter on
reverse charge basis) at the applicable rate, which at present is 28% (CGST
14% + SGST 14%)
 
We have mentioned in our GST Update on Real Estate Part-4 that from
harmoniously reading the provisions of the notification, it appears that the
developer will be required to pay GST on cement under reverse charge at the
applicable rate of 28% on all purchase of cement from unregistered dealers
and the clause of 80% purchase from registered persons is not to be applied
for purchase of cement. It is submitted that the answer given to the question
no. 9 also indicates that the developer is required to pay GST at 18% only with
respect to shortfall in case of inputs OTHER THAN cement for which GST at the
rate of 28% will be payable on entire purchases made from unregistered
 
persons. Therefore, we can conclude that the interpretation taken by us in our
update is in conformity with the view taken by the CBIC.
 
Question no. 10 In case of new rate of 5% / 1%, whether the conditions of
payment of tax through Cash Ledger, payment of tax under RCM subject to
80% limit, non-availing of Input Tax Credit, reversal of credit, maintenance of
project wise account, reporting of ITC not availed in corresponding GSTR-3B
etc. are required to be complied mandatorily by the Developer ?
 
Answer: Yes. All the specified conditions against clause (i) to (id) of Sl. No 3 of
Notification No. 11/2017-CTR are mandatory.
 
We had discussed in our GST Update on Real Estate Part-9 that the definition
of promoter given under section 2(zk) of the RERA is wide enough to cover the
landowner within its ambit and so the landowner is also eligible to avail the
benefit of concessional rate of GST prescribed by the Notification No. 3/2019-
Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. However, as per Fourth Proviso to the
conditions stated in the notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated
29.03.2019, the clause (ii) allows the landowner to avail input tax credit of the
tax charged by the developer provided the landowner sells the apartments
before completion certificate/first occupancy, whichever is earlier and pays tax
not less than that charged by the developer. We had pointed out that although
the landowner is allowed to avail the input tax credit of the tax charged by the
developer but due to restriction of discharging tax liability in cash only,
practically the landowner may not be able to avail the intended benefit of
input tax credit. As such, there is confusion as regards utilisation of input tax
credit by the landowner. However, if the FAQ no. 10 is observed, it is found
that it states that the conditions of payment of GST in cash, complying with the
condition of procurement of 80% inputs/input services from registered
supplier etc. is to be mandatorily complied by the developer. It does not
mention the term ‘promoter’ and so it can be inferred that the landowner can
pay GST by utilising input tax credit even if the option to pay GST under
notification no. 3/2019-Central Tax (Rate) is exercised. It is to be noted that
although the contents of the circular do not have legal sanctity but still they
can be basis of bonafide belief of the assessee.
 
The other important questions will be discussed in our next update.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com