Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON COMPOSITION SCHEME FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS

GST UPDATE ON COMPOSITION SCHEME FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS

In the 32nd GST Council Meeting held on 10.01.2019, proposal was made for introducing composition scheme for suppliers of services and supplier of services and goods both and this has been finally implemented vide Notification No. 2/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 07.03.2019. However, the notification does not have reference of section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 pertaining to composition levy. The notification no. 2/2019 has been issued  as Central Tax (Rate) Notification having reference of section 9(1) pertaining to levy and collection, section 11(1) specifying power to grant exemption from tax and section 16(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 stating eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit. The main portion of the notification specifying the powers under which the notification has been issued itself indicates that the notification no. 2/2019-Central Tax (Rate) is not composition scheme and rather it is kind of exemption notification.
The composition levy under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 is different from the levy of GST under section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 (normal scheme). As per the notification, the first supplies of goods or services or both upto an aggregate turnover of fifty lakh rupees made on or after 1st April, in any financial year by a registered person shall attract central tax at the rate of three per cent on all outward supplies subject to fulfilment of the condition that supplies made in the preceding financial year was fifty lakhs rupees or below.  Furthermore, there is an explanation to the notification which reads as follows:-
Explanation.-For the purposes of this notification, the expression “first supplies of goods or services or both” shall, for the purposes of determining eligibility of a person to pay tax under this notification, include the supplies from the first day of April of a financial year to the date from which he becomes liable for registration under the said Act but for the purpose of determination of tax payable under this notification shall not include the supplies from the first day of April of a financial year to the date from which he becomes liable for registration under the Act.
 
Now, since this scheme is applicable with effect from 01.04.2019, there is doubt amongst the already registered assessees having turnover less than Rs. 50 Lakhs in preceding financial year to avail the benefit of this notification no. 2/2019 along with the benefit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. This is for the reason that the limit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 is not exemption threshold but the limit for getting registration under GST Law. Now, if an assessee wants to avail dual benefit, whether it is possible to surrender the registration so that the benefit of notification no. 2/2019 along with benefit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 is availed? It is submitted that even if the benefit of Rs. 20 lakhs is availed by surrendering the existing registration, then too, the benefit of Rs. 20 Lakhs will be available only if there is no liability under reverse charge mechanism as if there is any such liability, assessee will be mandatorily required to get registration under section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017.The above provision can be explained with the help of an example as follows:-
 
M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in providing consultancy services. The aggregate turnover in the financial year 2018-19 was Rs. 35 Lakhs. M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. has surrendered its existing registration on 31.03.2019. The value of supplies made during the month of April, 2019 was Rs. 2 Lakhs. M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. received services from advocate in the month of May, 2019 and paid the advocate an amount of Rs. 50,000/- on 17.05.2019. Consequently, M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. became liable to get registration in the month of May, 2017 and is required to take registration within period of 30 days from 17.05.2019. Now, suppose, the value of supplies made upto 17.05.2019 is Rs. 75,000/-.
 
According to the explanation, the value of supplies made from 01.04.2019 will be included for computing the eligibility limit of applicability of composition levy to the extent of Rs. 50 Lakhs but no tax will be payable under composition scheme for the supplies made from 01.04.2019 to 17.05.2019. M/s ABC will be liable to pay GST at the rate of 6% only on supplies made w.e.f. 18.05.2019.
 
It is submitted that the limit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 is only with respect to registration under the GST Law and is not any threshold limit of exemption. Consequently, the assessee is not liable to pay GST only upto the time when he is not liable to get registration as per section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is pertinent to mention that section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017 specifies the categories wherein compulsory registration is to be taken by the assessee in certain cases wherein one of the case is liability to pay GST under reverse charge. As the para 7 of the notification clearly states that the assessee opting for composition levy will be liable to pay GST at applicable rates under reverse charge mechanism, the assessee will be liable to pay GST at the rate of 6% as soon as the assessee becomes liable to take registration even under section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017. It is pertinent to mention that the section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017 only overrides the section 22(1) and does not override section 23. However, since the assessee engaged in exempted supply of goods or services cannot opt for composition scheme, the assessee is not rescued by the rigours of section 24 pertaining to mandatory registration.
 
Now, another question that needs to be answered is the compliance to be done by the assessees under notification no. 2/2019. It is worth noting that one Removal of Difficulty Order No. 3/2019-Central Tax dated 08.03.2019 has been issued in order to clarify that person option for the notification no. 2/2019 shall issue bill of supply under section 31(3)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017. However, there is no mention regarding the returns to be filed by such assessee. Presently, the assessees opting for composition scheme under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 are required to file quarterly return under GSTR-4 and even the form of annual return for such assessees is GSTR-9A. However, since the present composition scheme for service providers is not covered under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017, a suitable clarification as regards the applicability of returns is expected from the government. Moreover, there are separate Rules for composition dealers regarding restriction of inter-state goods/imported goods held in stock on the date of exercising option of composition scheme. There is also procedure for withdrawal from the scheme and procedure for giving stock details on the date of opting out from the scheme in order to avail the input tax credit. It is worth noting that all the Rules specifically have reference of section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 but since the present composition scheme for supplier of services or goods or services both does not mention section 10, it is sure that the said Composition Rules are not applicable for assessee opting for composition under notification 2/2019. Well, it appears that a lot is required to be done by government else it will lead to chaos and confusion as regards the new composition scheme launched by them.This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
           
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com