Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON COMPOSITION SCHEME FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS

GST UPDATE ON COMPOSITION SCHEME FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS

In the 32nd GST Council Meeting held on 10.01.2019, proposal was made for introducing composition scheme for suppliers of services and supplier of services and goods both and this has been finally implemented vide Notification No. 2/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 07.03.2019. However, the notification does not have reference of section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 pertaining to composition levy. The notification no. 2/2019 has been issued  as Central Tax (Rate) Notification having reference of section 9(1) pertaining to levy and collection, section 11(1) specifying power to grant exemption from tax and section 16(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 stating eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit. The main portion of the notification specifying the powers under which the notification has been issued itself indicates that the notification no. 2/2019-Central Tax (Rate) is not composition scheme and rather it is kind of exemption notification.
The composition levy under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 is different from the levy of GST under section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 (normal scheme). As per the notification, the first supplies of goods or services or both upto an aggregate turnover of fifty lakh rupees made on or after 1st April, in any financial year by a registered person shall attract central tax at the rate of three per cent on all outward supplies subject to fulfilment of the condition that supplies made in the preceding financial year was fifty lakhs rupees or below.  Furthermore, there is an explanation to the notification which reads as follows:-
Explanation.-For the purposes of this notification, the expression “first supplies of goods or services or both” shall, for the purposes of determining eligibility of a person to pay tax under this notification, include the supplies from the first day of April of a financial year to the date from which he becomes liable for registration under the said Act but for the purpose of determination of tax payable under this notification shall not include the supplies from the first day of April of a financial year to the date from which he becomes liable for registration under the Act.
 
Now, since this scheme is applicable with effect from 01.04.2019, there is doubt amongst the already registered assessees having turnover less than Rs. 50 Lakhs in preceding financial year to avail the benefit of this notification no. 2/2019 along with the benefit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. This is for the reason that the limit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 is not exemption threshold but the limit for getting registration under GST Law. Now, if an assessee wants to avail dual benefit, whether it is possible to surrender the registration so that the benefit of notification no. 2/2019 along with benefit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 is availed? It is submitted that even if the benefit of Rs. 20 lakhs is availed by surrendering the existing registration, then too, the benefit of Rs. 20 Lakhs will be available only if there is no liability under reverse charge mechanism as if there is any such liability, assessee will be mandatorily required to get registration under section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017.The above provision can be explained with the help of an example as follows:-
 
M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in providing consultancy services. The aggregate turnover in the financial year 2018-19 was Rs. 35 Lakhs. M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. has surrendered its existing registration on 31.03.2019. The value of supplies made during the month of April, 2019 was Rs. 2 Lakhs. M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. received services from advocate in the month of May, 2019 and paid the advocate an amount of Rs. 50,000/- on 17.05.2019. Consequently, M/s ABC Pvt. Ltd. became liable to get registration in the month of May, 2017 and is required to take registration within period of 30 days from 17.05.2019. Now, suppose, the value of supplies made upto 17.05.2019 is Rs. 75,000/-.
 
According to the explanation, the value of supplies made from 01.04.2019 will be included for computing the eligibility limit of applicability of composition levy to the extent of Rs. 50 Lakhs but no tax will be payable under composition scheme for the supplies made from 01.04.2019 to 17.05.2019. M/s ABC will be liable to pay GST at the rate of 6% only on supplies made w.e.f. 18.05.2019.
 
It is submitted that the limit of Rs. 20 Lakhs given under section 22 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 is only with respect to registration under the GST Law and is not any threshold limit of exemption. Consequently, the assessee is not liable to pay GST only upto the time when he is not liable to get registration as per section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is pertinent to mention that section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017 specifies the categories wherein compulsory registration is to be taken by the assessee in certain cases wherein one of the case is liability to pay GST under reverse charge. As the para 7 of the notification clearly states that the assessee opting for composition levy will be liable to pay GST at applicable rates under reverse charge mechanism, the assessee will be liable to pay GST at the rate of 6% as soon as the assessee becomes liable to take registration even under section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017. It is pertinent to mention that the section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017 only overrides the section 22(1) and does not override section 23. However, since the assessee engaged in exempted supply of goods or services cannot opt for composition scheme, the assessee is not rescued by the rigours of section 24 pertaining to mandatory registration.
 
Now, another question that needs to be answered is the compliance to be done by the assessees under notification no. 2/2019. It is worth noting that one Removal of Difficulty Order No. 3/2019-Central Tax dated 08.03.2019 has been issued in order to clarify that person option for the notification no. 2/2019 shall issue bill of supply under section 31(3)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017. However, there is no mention regarding the returns to be filed by such assessee. Presently, the assessees opting for composition scheme under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 are required to file quarterly return under GSTR-4 and even the form of annual return for such assessees is GSTR-9A. However, since the present composition scheme for service providers is not covered under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017, a suitable clarification as regards the applicability of returns is expected from the government. Moreover, there are separate Rules for composition dealers regarding restriction of inter-state goods/imported goods held in stock on the date of exercising option of composition scheme. There is also procedure for withdrawal from the scheme and procedure for giving stock details on the date of opting out from the scheme in order to avail the input tax credit. It is worth noting that all the Rules specifically have reference of section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 but since the present composition scheme for supplier of services or goods or services both does not mention section 10, it is sure that the said Composition Rules are not applicable for assessee opting for composition under notification 2/2019. Well, it appears that a lot is required to be done by government else it will lead to chaos and confusion as regards the new composition scheme launched by them.This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
           
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com