Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON CLASSIFICATION DISPUTE IN PRINTING INDUSTRY 67/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON CLASSIFICATION DISPUTE IN PRINTING INDUSTRY 67/2020-21


The confusion as regards treating the transaction as supply of goods or supply of services is very common in the printing industry. It was hoped that the disputes as regards classification would vanish in the GST era as there would be single tax on supply of goods and services but this has remained only hope and has not turned into reality as even in GST era, there are disputes of classification of transaction as goods or services due to different rates prescribed by the government. The classification of the transaction as goods or services is dependent on facts and circumstances of each case and the predominance factor. The CBIC has also issued Circular No. 11/11/2017-GST dated 20th October, 2017 wherein it was clarified that in case of printing of books, brochures, reports wherein the content is provided by publisher while physical inputs including paper used for printing belong to the printer, printing is the principal supply and such supplies would be considered as supply of services under SAC 9989. However, in case of supply of printed envelopes, tissues etc. bearing logo, the principal supply is of goods and so it would be considered as supply of goods under HSN 48/49 of Customs Tariff. Hence, the litmus test is the importance of content supplied by publisher on case to case basis.

In this background, it is apt to discuss a recent advance ruling of MAXWELL CO. PVT. LTD, 2020 (32) G. S. T. L. 545 (A. A. R. – GST – U.P.),wherein it was held that services of printing of question paper provided by the applicant institutions to other than ‘educational institutions’, then GST shall be applicable at the rate of 12%. The applicant is in the business of confidential printing and supply of Board/University examination papers.

The Authority observed that as per the provisions of the Circular 11/2017 dated 20th Oct 2017 and the business which is undertaken by applicant is printing of examination papers for Secondary and Higher Secondary Educational Boards as well as for State Universities. The content of the printed matter is specific to the customer and the applicant does not have any ownership on the content at any point of time. The question papers are not the property of the Applicant; hence, title of the above printed matters cannot be transferred. Those question papers are not marketable commodities in the open market. As the usage right of the material of question papers are owned by the Education Boards/ Educational Institutes and physical inputs used for printing belong to the applicant, printing of question paper constitutes supply of service classified under Heading 9989.

In case the services of printing of question papers are given to ‘educational institution’ which includes institutes providing pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent, education as a part of curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for time being in force or education as a part of an approved vocational education course, then such services are exempt from GST. However, if services of printing of question paper are provided by the applicant institutions to other than ‘educational institutions’, then GST at the rate of 12% shall be applicable and will be covered by Sr. No. 27(i) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Similarly, AAR in case of M/s Department of Printing, Stationery and Publication held that these services are not eligible for GST exemption and 12% of GST is applicable on the activity of printing and supply of textbooks to government departments which are registered under GST Act. However, the authority clarified that in the case of the printing and supply of textbooks to government departments that are not registered under the GST Act, the applicant is exempted from the liability to pay tax.

Moreover, in AAR Ruling of Sukee Print Pack LLPrelating to GST on Printing of books etc. for which materials are provided by customers, it was held that in the case where applicant is supplying the paper and paper board printed with content supplied by the recipient of the goods made using physical inputs including paper belonging to the recipient and –

a. If the final printed material is a book or a journal or a periodical and if the materials on which the printing is done are provided by the customers, then the activity would be covered under entry 26(i)(d) Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and would be liable to tax at 2.5% CGST plus 2.5% SGST.

b. If the final printed material is other than a book or a journal or a periodical but the involves the jobwork of printing of all goods falling under Chapter 48 or 49, which attract CGST @ 6 per cent, then the activity would be covered under entry 26(ia)(b) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and is liable to tax at 6% CGST plus 6% SGST.

c. If the jobwork of printing made on the materials belonging to other is not covered by the above two items, then the same is liable to be covered under Entry No. 26(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to time and is liable to tax at 9% CGST plus 9% SGST.

2. In the case where the paper and paper board along with content supplied by the recipient of the goods and the applicant prints the content on the paper and paper board supplied by the recipient of the goods by using the physical inputs belonging to the printer, then

a. If the supply of services is related to the printing of newspapers, books (including Braille books), journals and periodicals, then such supplies are taxable under entry no. 27(i) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to time and is liable to tax at 6% CGST plus 6% SGST.

b. If the supply of service is related to the printing of materials other than newspapers, books (including Braille books), journals and periodicals, then such supplies are taxable under entry no. 27(ii) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to time and is liable to tax at 9% CGST plus 9% SGST.

The above decisions pronounced by various advance rulings clearly depict the fact that there cannot be a set rule for determining classification of activities in case of printing industry. The classification of transaction requires analysis of the facts regarding ownership of content of material and the pre-dominance factor in the said supply. Therefore, great caution needs to be exercised while doing classification with respect to printing industry.

This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com , at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com