Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Clarification in respect of utilization of input tax credit under GST

GST Update on Clarification in respect of utilization of input tax credit under GST
 
Today we are sharing an update on the clarification issued by the department on order of utilization of input tax credit. As the provisions contained in section 49A and 49B of the CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 88A have been introduced, the provisions cannot be implemented due to absence of appropriate facility at the common portal. We had prepared an update on the same in which we have tried to explain in the simple manner the concerns addressed by the discussed communication.
 
 
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs vide its Circular No. 98/17/2019-GST dated 23rd April 2019, addressed the confusions created due to change in the order of utilisation of input tax credit. Although, the provisions contained in section 49A and 49B of the CGST Act, 2017 along with Rule 88A have been introduced but the provisions cannot be implemented due to absence of appropriate facility at the common portal. This has also led to confusion as regards the validity of the returns filed by assessees as the manner of utilisation of input tax credit is not in conformity with Rule 88A of the CGST Rules, 2017. Furthermore, important point to note is that whether the provisions contained in Rule can override the provisions contained in section 49A of the CGST Act, 2017 recently amended by the government. Well, as stated in our earlier update also, in GST era, the GSTN has precedence over the provisions contained in the Act or the Rules as even if the Rule 88A prescribes new mechanism for utilisation of input tax credit, the said mechanism cannot be adhered to unless and until the common portal is compatible with the amended provisions. Till date, the functionality to utilise credit as per the provision contained in Rule 88A is not operational on the common portal and so this circular clarifies that the assessee may continue the old method of utilisation of input tax credit which at least relieves the assessee from the fear of dispute with revenue authorities as regards mechanism of utilisation in future.
 
The order of utilisation of input tax credit is explained as follows:-
Input tax Credit on
account of
Output liability on account of
Integrated tax
Output liability of
Central tax
Output liability of State tax / Union
Territory tax
Integrated tax 1st 2nd  and 3rd – In any order among C & S  and in any proportion  between  them.
Central tax (only after completely using IGST) 5th 4th Not permitted
State  tax  /  Union
Territory tax (only after completely using IGST)
7th Not permitted 6th
 















It is to be noted here that the provision contained in Rule 88A is in line with the newly inserted section 49A of the CGST Act, 2017 which overrides the provisions of section 49 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, it is only section 49 that states that the central tax should not be utilised for payment of State Tax/UT tax or vice versa. It is also worth noting that the provisions of section 49A overrides section 49 without any exception whereas provision of section 49B are notwithstanding anything contained in the Chapter but subject to clause (e) and (f) of section 49(5) which state that the credit of Central Tax cannot be utilised for payment of State Tax/UT tax or vice versa. Furthermore, it has not been specified that Rule 88A is being issued under section 49B of the CGST Act, 2017. Not only this, section 49B clearly states that the government may on the recommendations of the Council prescribe the order and manner of utilisation of input tax credit. However, the 34th GST Council Meeting exclusively discussed the changes to be made in the real estate sector.  Consequently, it can be inferred that since there was no express recommendation of GST Council for change in utilisation of input tax credit, Rule 88A has been issued in line with section 49A of the CGST Act, 2017. However, the Rule 88A goes one step ahead and grants choice to the assessee that the remaining balance of input tax credit on account of IGST can be utilised in any order for discharging liability of CGST/SGST/UTGST. Now, the moot question that arises is that is it permissible to change the manner of utilisation of input tax credit by granting discretion to the assessee regarding order of utilisation even when there is no such provision in section 49A of CGST Act? Another question that arises is whether the present clarification issued in the context of Rule 88A is binding on assessee and department both? It is submitted that the circulars issued by the board are binding on departmental authorities but the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held in the case of RATAN MELTING & WIRE INDUSTRIES [2008 (231) E.L.T. 22 (S.C.)]that circulars are binding on revenue authorities but they can challenge the said circulars if they are contrary to the statutory provisions contained in law. Well, as the provisions contained in Rule 88A grant liberty as regards order of utilisation of IGST credit between CGST/SGST/UTGST as per choice of assessee which is not backed by any statutory provision, the validity of Rule 88A and the clarification is surely doubted. Well, as far as the method of utilisation of credit is favourable to the assessee, there is no harm in following the same. But, as stated by us in the beginning of this update, it is an irony to see that neither the Act, nor the Rules prevail but what prevails is the Software of GSTN. Hence, the benefit of this new method of utilisation can be availed only after the said facility is operational on the common portal.  
 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
          
 
  
   
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com