Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Clarification in respect of utilization of input tax credit under GST

GST Update on Clarification in respect of utilization of input tax credit under GST
 
Today we are sharing an update on the clarification issued by the department on order of utilization of input tax credit. As the provisions contained in section 49A and 49B of the CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 88A have been introduced, the provisions cannot be implemented due to absence of appropriate facility at the common portal. We had prepared an update on the same in which we have tried to explain in the simple manner the concerns addressed by the discussed communication.
 
 
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs vide its Circular No. 98/17/2019-GST dated 23rd April 2019, addressed the confusions created due to change in the order of utilisation of input tax credit. Although, the provisions contained in section 49A and 49B of the CGST Act, 2017 along with Rule 88A have been introduced but the provisions cannot be implemented due to absence of appropriate facility at the common portal. This has also led to confusion as regards the validity of the returns filed by assessees as the manner of utilisation of input tax credit is not in conformity with Rule 88A of the CGST Rules, 2017. Furthermore, important point to note is that whether the provisions contained in Rule can override the provisions contained in section 49A of the CGST Act, 2017 recently amended by the government. Well, as stated in our earlier update also, in GST era, the GSTN has precedence over the provisions contained in the Act or the Rules as even if the Rule 88A prescribes new mechanism for utilisation of input tax credit, the said mechanism cannot be adhered to unless and until the common portal is compatible with the amended provisions. Till date, the functionality to utilise credit as per the provision contained in Rule 88A is not operational on the common portal and so this circular clarifies that the assessee may continue the old method of utilisation of input tax credit which at least relieves the assessee from the fear of dispute with revenue authorities as regards mechanism of utilisation in future.
 
The order of utilisation of input tax credit is explained as follows:-
Input tax Credit on
account of
Output liability on account of
Integrated tax
Output liability of
Central tax
Output liability of State tax / Union
Territory tax
Integrated tax 1st 2nd  and 3rd – In any order among C & S  and in any proportion  between  them.
Central tax (only after completely using IGST) 5th 4th Not permitted
State  tax  /  Union
Territory tax (only after completely using IGST)
7th Not permitted 6th
 















It is to be noted here that the provision contained in Rule 88A is in line with the newly inserted section 49A of the CGST Act, 2017 which overrides the provisions of section 49 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, it is only section 49 that states that the central tax should not be utilised for payment of State Tax/UT tax or vice versa. It is also worth noting that the provisions of section 49A overrides section 49 without any exception whereas provision of section 49B are notwithstanding anything contained in the Chapter but subject to clause (e) and (f) of section 49(5) which state that the credit of Central Tax cannot be utilised for payment of State Tax/UT tax or vice versa. Furthermore, it has not been specified that Rule 88A is being issued under section 49B of the CGST Act, 2017. Not only this, section 49B clearly states that the government may on the recommendations of the Council prescribe the order and manner of utilisation of input tax credit. However, the 34th GST Council Meeting exclusively discussed the changes to be made in the real estate sector.  Consequently, it can be inferred that since there was no express recommendation of GST Council for change in utilisation of input tax credit, Rule 88A has been issued in line with section 49A of the CGST Act, 2017. However, the Rule 88A goes one step ahead and grants choice to the assessee that the remaining balance of input tax credit on account of IGST can be utilised in any order for discharging liability of CGST/SGST/UTGST. Now, the moot question that arises is that is it permissible to change the manner of utilisation of input tax credit by granting discretion to the assessee regarding order of utilisation even when there is no such provision in section 49A of CGST Act? Another question that arises is whether the present clarification issued in the context of Rule 88A is binding on assessee and department both? It is submitted that the circulars issued by the board are binding on departmental authorities but the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held in the case of RATAN MELTING & WIRE INDUSTRIES [2008 (231) E.L.T. 22 (S.C.)]that circulars are binding on revenue authorities but they can challenge the said circulars if they are contrary to the statutory provisions contained in law. Well, as the provisions contained in Rule 88A grant liberty as regards order of utilisation of IGST credit between CGST/SGST/UTGST as per choice of assessee which is not backed by any statutory provision, the validity of Rule 88A and the clarification is surely doubted. Well, as far as the method of utilisation of credit is favourable to the assessee, there is no harm in following the same. But, as stated by us in the beginning of this update, it is an irony to see that neither the Act, nor the Rules prevail but what prevails is the Software of GSTN. Hence, the benefit of this new method of utilisation can be availed only after the said facility is operational on the common portal.  
 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
          
 
  
   
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com