Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN PART-3

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN PART-3
In continuation to our earlier update on reporting of credit notes, we intend to discuss certain other issues with respect to disclosure requirement of credit notes in the annual return. We submit that it is being understood that financial credit/debit notes that do not impact GST are not to be considered while filing annual return and reconciliation statement. However, certain disclosure requirement in annual return leads to reflecting financial credit/debit notes too which is totally absurd.
The serial no. 5H of annual return requires disclosure of credit notes issued in respect of following supplies made by the assessee:-
• Zero rated supply (export) without payment of tax, 
• Supply to SEZ without payment of tax
• Supplies on which tax is to be paid by the recipient on reverse charge basis
• Exempted
• Nil rated
• Non-GST supply 
It is worth noting that serial no. 5 of Annual Return pertains to “Details of outward supplies on which tax is not payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year”. Hence, this serial pertains to outward supplies on which GST is not payable. Consequently, the adjustments made in such supplies on account of issuance of credit/debit notes will also not have any GST effect. In nutshell, we can say that credit/debit notes issued against such supplies are to be treated as ‘financial credit/debit notes’ that should not have any disclosure requirement. However, serial no. 5H and 5I of the Annual Return requires separate disclosure of such credit notes/debit notes. 
At this juncture, it is also worth pointing that while filing GSTR-1, Nil rated supplies are to be disclosed in consolidated manner as inter-state registered, inter-state unregistered, intra-state registered, and intra-state unregistered. The assessees are not required to submit invoice wise details in GSTR-1 for nil rated/exempted/non GST supplies. Moreover, if there is any amendment in the value of such supplies, the same is adjusted in the consolidated amount in the GSTR-1 for the next month. Say for example, if the intra-state exempted supply to registered person was originally reported as Rs. 10,000/- in the month of July, 2017. Thereafter, cash discount of Rs. 2,000/- was given by way of issuing credit note. The said adjustment was made in the GSTR-1 filed for the month of September, 2017 which had exempted intra-state supplies to registered person as Rs. 20,000/-. Consequently, Rs. 2,000/- was deducted from the value of supplies and net amount of Rs. 18,000/- was reflected in the GSTR-1 for the month of September, 2017. This example implies that this adjustment in value of exempted supply by way of issuance of credit note does not impact GST and is to be considered as financial credit note. However, the annual return requires separate disclosure in 5H which will be difficult for the assessees as net amounts are reflected in GSTR-1. The government should seriously consider the amendment in the disclosure requirement specified in 5H of the annual return in the interests of assessees. 
It is also pertinent to ponder upon another difficulty that will be faced by assessee exporting goods and issuing credit notes. It is worth noting that exports can be done either under LUT or on payment of IGST. However, in case of exports on payment of IGST, the assessee claims refund of IGST paid and the IGST has no impact on the foreign buyer as it is not charged from the foreign buyer. Consequently, even if credit note is issued, it partake the nature of financial credit note that should not be declared in the annual return. Moreover, if the credit note is issued after the assessee has received refund of IGST, the GST effect cannot be made in the credit note as if credit note along with GST effect is issued, it will lead to double benefit of claiming refund and availing credit which is not permissible. It may be noted that till date there is no mechanism for linking credit note issued with the custom portal as the option to provide credit note in case of exports on payment of tax does not require mention of shipping bill by assessee. Hence, the logic behind separate disclosure of credit notes issued with respect to exports made on payment of IGST is not understandable. It may be noted that while filing GSTR-1, unlike nil rated supplies, there is option to disclose credit notes issued for exports made without payment of tax and exports made with payment of tax. A suitable clarification as regards disclosure requirement of credit notes in serial no. 5H should be issued by the government at the earliest possible. 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com