Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN PART-3

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN PART-3
In continuation to our earlier update on reporting of credit notes, we intend to discuss certain other issues with respect to disclosure requirement of credit notes in the annual return. We submit that it is being understood that financial credit/debit notes that do not impact GST are not to be considered while filing annual return and reconciliation statement. However, certain disclosure requirement in annual return leads to reflecting financial credit/debit notes too which is totally absurd.
The serial no. 5H of annual return requires disclosure of credit notes issued in respect of following supplies made by the assessee:-
• Zero rated supply (export) without payment of tax, 
• Supply to SEZ without payment of tax
• Supplies on which tax is to be paid by the recipient on reverse charge basis
• Exempted
• Nil rated
• Non-GST supply 
It is worth noting that serial no. 5 of Annual Return pertains to “Details of outward supplies on which tax is not payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year”. Hence, this serial pertains to outward supplies on which GST is not payable. Consequently, the adjustments made in such supplies on account of issuance of credit/debit notes will also not have any GST effect. In nutshell, we can say that credit/debit notes issued against such supplies are to be treated as ‘financial credit/debit notes’ that should not have any disclosure requirement. However, serial no. 5H and 5I of the Annual Return requires separate disclosure of such credit notes/debit notes. 
At this juncture, it is also worth pointing that while filing GSTR-1, Nil rated supplies are to be disclosed in consolidated manner as inter-state registered, inter-state unregistered, intra-state registered, and intra-state unregistered. The assessees are not required to submit invoice wise details in GSTR-1 for nil rated/exempted/non GST supplies. Moreover, if there is any amendment in the value of such supplies, the same is adjusted in the consolidated amount in the GSTR-1 for the next month. Say for example, if the intra-state exempted supply to registered person was originally reported as Rs. 10,000/- in the month of July, 2017. Thereafter, cash discount of Rs. 2,000/- was given by way of issuing credit note. The said adjustment was made in the GSTR-1 filed for the month of September, 2017 which had exempted intra-state supplies to registered person as Rs. 20,000/-. Consequently, Rs. 2,000/- was deducted from the value of supplies and net amount of Rs. 18,000/- was reflected in the GSTR-1 for the month of September, 2017. This example implies that this adjustment in value of exempted supply by way of issuance of credit note does not impact GST and is to be considered as financial credit note. However, the annual return requires separate disclosure in 5H which will be difficult for the assessees as net amounts are reflected in GSTR-1. The government should seriously consider the amendment in the disclosure requirement specified in 5H of the annual return in the interests of assessees. 
It is also pertinent to ponder upon another difficulty that will be faced by assessee exporting goods and issuing credit notes. It is worth noting that exports can be done either under LUT or on payment of IGST. However, in case of exports on payment of IGST, the assessee claims refund of IGST paid and the IGST has no impact on the foreign buyer as it is not charged from the foreign buyer. Consequently, even if credit note is issued, it partake the nature of financial credit note that should not be declared in the annual return. Moreover, if the credit note is issued after the assessee has received refund of IGST, the GST effect cannot be made in the credit note as if credit note along with GST effect is issued, it will lead to double benefit of claiming refund and availing credit which is not permissible. It may be noted that till date there is no mechanism for linking credit note issued with the custom portal as the option to provide credit note in case of exports on payment of tax does not require mention of shipping bill by assessee. Hence, the logic behind separate disclosure of credit notes issued with respect to exports made on payment of IGST is not understandable. It may be noted that while filing GSTR-1, unlike nil rated supplies, there is option to disclose credit notes issued for exports made without payment of tax and exports made with payment of tax. A suitable clarification as regards disclosure requirement of credit notes in serial no. 5H should be issued by the government at the earliest possible. 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com