Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-3

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-3
GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-3
 
In earlier update, we discussed about the details to be filled in serial no. 4B “Supplies made to registered persons (B2B)” of Part-II of the Annual Return requiring the details of advance, inward and outward supplies on which tax is payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year. In the present update, we seek to discuss on the details required to be filed with respect to Inward Supplies on which tax is to be paid on reverse charge under serial no. 4G of the Annual Return.
 
As we all know that under GST regime, the assessee is required to pay GST under reverse charge mechanism under two sections, section 9(3) specifying goods or services under on which reverse charge is applicable and section 9(4) pertaining to supplies from un-registered persons. It is worth noting that the reverse charge mechanism under section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 was deferred vide notification no. 38/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017 and so the reverse charge on account of inward supplies from un-registered persons was in operation from 1.7.2017 to 12.10.2017 subject to limit of Rs. 5,000/- per day. Therefore, while filing annual return, the assessee is required to compute their liability properly under both the sections and if GST has not been paid on the transactions attracting reverse charge mechanism, the said GST is required to be paid vide DRC-03 in cash. It is also pertinent to mention that the GST paid vide DRC-03 with respect to reverse charge mechanism would become cost to assessee as the input tax credit would not be admissible to the assessee for the same.
 
The reporting of transactions relating to reverse charge mechanism would effect liability and input tax credit simultaneously which point needs to be taken care of particularly. We hereby discuss different situations and their reporting from the perspective of filing annual return:-
 
 
Situation No. 1:-
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
March, 2018 Yes March, 2018
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
 
The reporting of the above transaction in annual return will be as follows:-
The RCM liability will be reported in Table 4G as Rs. 1,75,000/-
The input tax credit availed will be reported in Table 6C/6D as Rs. 1,75,000/-.
Situation No. 2
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
Rs. 1,00,000/- was discharged in March, 2018.
Balance liability of Rs. 75,000/- was discharged in May, 2018.
Yes ITC of Rs. 1,00,000 taken in March, 2018
Balance ITC of Rs. 75,000/- taken in May, 2018
 
In the annual return, we are suppose to reflect transactions pertaining to financial year 2017-18 given effect for in returns filed during 2018-19 separately. Therefore, the reporting under the above situation will be as follows:-
The RCM liability of Rs. 1,00,000/- will be reported in table 4G while the balance liability of Rs. 75,000/- will be reported in table 10 of the annual return.
Similarly, the ITC availment of Rs. 1,00,000/- will be reported in table 6C/6D while the balance ITC availment will be reported in table 13 of the annual return.
 
Situation No. 3
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
Not discharged till date Yes Not availed till date
 
The amount of Rs. 1,75,000/- required to be discharged under reverse charge mechanism but not paid till date by the assessee will have to be reflected in table 4G of annual return and will have to be paid vide DRC-03. It is to be noted that the assessee will not be able to take input tax credit even if the same is admissible as no claim for input tax credit can be made through filing of annual return. 
 
It is submitted that during the initial stages of implementation of GST regime, there was confusion as regards availability of input tax credit paid under reverse charge mechanism in the same month and consequently, there are cases wherein GST was paid under reverse charge mechanism but the input tax credit was claimed in subsequent months. In such cases, there will be change in the reporting mechanism as discussed in the above situations. For the sake of clarity, we explain the scenario by way of following situation:-
 
 
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
Rs. 1,75,000/- was discharged in November, 2018. Yes ITC of Rs. 1,00,000 taken in January, 2018
Balance ITC of Rs. 75,000/- taken in April, 2018
 
The RCM liability will be reported in Table 4G as Rs. 1,75,000/-
The input tax credit availed will be reported in Table 6C/6D as Rs. 1,00,000/- whereas the balance input tax credit availed in April, 2018 (next financial year) will be reported in table 13 of the annual return.
 
The points as regards other aspects in filing annual return will be discussed in our next update.
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
           
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com