Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-3

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-3
GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-3
 
In earlier update, we discussed about the details to be filled in serial no. 4B “Supplies made to registered persons (B2B)” of Part-II of the Annual Return requiring the details of advance, inward and outward supplies on which tax is payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year. In the present update, we seek to discuss on the details required to be filed with respect to Inward Supplies on which tax is to be paid on reverse charge under serial no. 4G of the Annual Return.
 
As we all know that under GST regime, the assessee is required to pay GST under reverse charge mechanism under two sections, section 9(3) specifying goods or services under on which reverse charge is applicable and section 9(4) pertaining to supplies from un-registered persons. It is worth noting that the reverse charge mechanism under section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 was deferred vide notification no. 38/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017 and so the reverse charge on account of inward supplies from un-registered persons was in operation from 1.7.2017 to 12.10.2017 subject to limit of Rs. 5,000/- per day. Therefore, while filing annual return, the assessee is required to compute their liability properly under both the sections and if GST has not been paid on the transactions attracting reverse charge mechanism, the said GST is required to be paid vide DRC-03 in cash. It is also pertinent to mention that the GST paid vide DRC-03 with respect to reverse charge mechanism would become cost to assessee as the input tax credit would not be admissible to the assessee for the same.
 
The reporting of transactions relating to reverse charge mechanism would effect liability and input tax credit simultaneously which point needs to be taken care of particularly. We hereby discuss different situations and their reporting from the perspective of filing annual return:-
 
 
Situation No. 1:-
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
March, 2018 Yes March, 2018
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
 
The reporting of the above transaction in annual return will be as follows:-
The RCM liability will be reported in Table 4G as Rs. 1,75,000/-
The input tax credit availed will be reported in Table 6C/6D as Rs. 1,75,000/-.
Situation No. 2
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
Rs. 1,00,000/- was discharged in March, 2018.
Balance liability of Rs. 75,000/- was discharged in May, 2018.
Yes ITC of Rs. 1,00,000 taken in March, 2018
Balance ITC of Rs. 75,000/- taken in May, 2018
 
In the annual return, we are suppose to reflect transactions pertaining to financial year 2017-18 given effect for in returns filed during 2018-19 separately. Therefore, the reporting under the above situation will be as follows:-
The RCM liability of Rs. 1,00,000/- will be reported in table 4G while the balance liability of Rs. 75,000/- will be reported in table 10 of the annual return.
Similarly, the ITC availment of Rs. 1,00,000/- will be reported in table 6C/6D while the balance ITC availment will be reported in table 13 of the annual return.
 
Situation No. 3
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
Not discharged till date Yes Not availed till date
 
The amount of Rs. 1,75,000/- required to be discharged under reverse charge mechanism but not paid till date by the assessee will have to be reflected in table 4G of annual return and will have to be paid vide DRC-03. It is to be noted that the assessee will not be able to take input tax credit even if the same is admissible as no claim for input tax credit can be made through filing of annual return. 
 
It is submitted that during the initial stages of implementation of GST regime, there was confusion as regards availability of input tax credit paid under reverse charge mechanism in the same month and consequently, there are cases wherein GST was paid under reverse charge mechanism but the input tax credit was claimed in subsequent months. In such cases, there will be change in the reporting mechanism as discussed in the above situations. For the sake of clarity, we explain the scenario by way of following situation:-
 
 
RCM Liability for the month of Discharged in GSTR-3B for the month of Whether input tax credit admissible? Input Tax Credit availed in the GSTR-3B for the month of
October, 2017
Amount-Rs. 1,75,000/-
Rs. 1,75,000/- was discharged in November, 2018. Yes ITC of Rs. 1,00,000 taken in January, 2018
Balance ITC of Rs. 75,000/- taken in April, 2018
 
The RCM liability will be reported in Table 4G as Rs. 1,75,000/-
The input tax credit availed will be reported in Table 6C/6D as Rs. 1,00,000/- whereas the balance input tax credit availed in April, 2018 (next financial year) will be reported in table 13 of the annual return.
 
The points as regards other aspects in filing annual return will be discussed in our next update.
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
           
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com