Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-2

GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-2
GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-2
 
In earlier update, we discussed about the details to be filled in serial no. 4A of Part-II of the Annual Return requiring the details of advance, inward and outward supplies on which tax is payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year. In the present update, we seek to discuss on the details to be filled in serial no. 4B “Supplies made to registered persons (B2B)”.
 
The assessee is required to report the details of all supplies (intra-state and inter-state both) made to registered persons during the financial year 2017-18 but the outward supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis by the recipient would not be taken for reporting under this serial.  If we compare the details required to be furnished under this serial no. as against serial no. 4A-supplies made to un-registered persons (B2C), we find lot of difference. The supplies declared under serial no. 4A are to be shown net of debit/credit notes and amendments made during the financial year but while reporting supplies under serial no. 4B pertaining to B2B, the adjustments on account of debit/credit notes is to be separately reflected under serial no. 4J/4I of the Part-II of the annual return. Likewise, amendments made in B2B supplies during the financial year 2017-18 are to be separately reported under serial no. 4K/4L of the Part-II of the annual return. However, if the amendments pertaining to financial year 2017-18 are being carried out in the returns filed during the financial year 2018-19, such amendments made in financial year 2018-19 are to be reported in serial no. 10/11 of Part V of the annual return. This can be explained with the help of following examples:-
Example 1:-
B2B Supplies made in FY 2017-18 = Rs. 10,00,000/-
Supplies made in the month of December, 2017 were Rs. 2,50,000/- but were wrongly reported in GSTR-3B as 2,00,000/-. The amendment for the same was carried out in the GSTR-3B for the month of February, 2018.
In this case, the amount to be reported in serial no. 4B will be Rs. 9,50,000/- and amount of Rs. 50,000/- will be reported in serial no. 4K of the annual return.   
Example 2:-
B2B Supplies made in FY 2017-18 = Rs. 10,00,000/-
Supplies made in the month of December, 2017 were Rs. 2,50,000/- but were wrongly reported in GSTR-3B as 2,00,000/-. The amendment for the same was carried out in the GSTR-3B for the month of May, 2018.
In this case, the amount to be reported in serial no. 4B will be Rs. 9,50,000/- and amount of Rs. 50,000/- will be reported in serial no. 10 of Part V of the annual return.
 
Now, the question that arises in the minds of assessee is that whether amendments carried out even after filing the return for the month of September, 2018 are to be considered in Part V while filing annual return for financial year 2017-18 in light of the Removal of Difficulty Order No. 02/2018-Central Tax dated 31.12.2018 issued by the government?  If we study the Removal of Difficulty Order, it is found that the amendment in GSTR-1 (pertaining to invoice/debit note/credit note) is permitted after September, 2018 till the due date of furnishing GSTR-1 for the month of March, 2019 only with the objective to enable the recipient assessee to claim input tax credit unavailed due to non-reflection of input tax credit in GSTR-2A of the recipient. The Removal of Difficulty Order does not permit any amendment in GSTR-3B return through which assessee pays tax. Consequently, credit notes/debit notes pertaining to financial year 2017-18 included in GSTR-1 but not reflected in GSTR-3B upto due date of furnishing GSTR-3B for the month of September, 2018 will not be considered while filing details in serial no. 10/11 of Part V of the annual return.   
 
The points as regards other aspects in filing annual return will be discussed in our next update. GST UPDATE ON ANNUAL RETURN COMPLIANCE-PART-2
 
In earlier update, we discussed about the details to be filled in serial no. 4A of Part-II of the Annual Return requiring the details of advance, inward and outward supplies on which tax is payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year. In the present update, we seek to discuss on the details to be filled in serial no. 4B “Supplies made to registered persons (B2B)”.
 
The assessee is required to report the details of all supplies (intra-state and inter-state both) made to registered persons during the financial year 2017-18 but the outward supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis by the recipient would not be taken for reporting under this serial.  If we compare the details required to be furnished under this serial no. as against serial no. 4A-supplies made to un-registered persons (B2C), we find lot of difference. The supplies declared under serial no. 4A are to be shown net of debit/credit notes and amendments made during the financial year but while reporting supplies under serial no. 4B pertaining to B2B, the adjustments on account of debit/credit notes is to be separately reflected under serial no. 4J/4I of the Part-II of the annual return. Likewise, amendments made in B2B supplies during the financial year 2017-18 are to be separately reported under serial no. 4K/4L of the Part-II of the annual return. However, if the amendments pertaining to financial year 2017-18 are being carried out in the returns filed during the financial year 2018-19, such amendments made in financial year 2018-19 are to be reported in serial no. 10/11 of Part V of the annual return. This can be explained with the help of following examples:-
Example 1:-
B2B Supplies made in FY 2017-18 = Rs. 10,00,000/-
Supplies made in the month of December, 2017 were Rs. 2,50,000/- but were wrongly reported in GSTR-3B as 2,00,000/-. The amendment for the same was carried out in the GSTR-3B for the month of February, 2018.
In this case, the amount to be reported in serial no. 4B will be Rs. 9,50,000/- and amount of Rs. 50,000/- will be reported in serial no. 4K of the annual return.   
Example 2:-
B2B Supplies made in FY 2017-18 = Rs. 10,00,000/-
Supplies made in the month of December, 2017 were Rs. 2,50,000/- but were wrongly reported in GSTR-3B as 2,00,000/-. The amendment for the same was carried out in the GSTR-3B for the month of May, 2018.
In this case, the amount to be reported in serial no. 4B will be Rs. 9,50,000/- and amount of Rs. 50,000/- will be reported in serial no. 10 of Part V of the annual return.
 
Now, the question that arises in the minds of assessee is that whether amendments carried out even after filing the return for the month of September, 2018 are to be considered in Part V while filing annual return for financial year 2017-18 in light of the Removal of Difficulty Order No. 02/2018-Central Tax dated 31.12.2018 issued by the government?  If we study the Removal of Difficulty Order, it is found that the amendment in GSTR-1 (pertaining to invoice/debit note/credit note) is permitted after September, 2018 till the due date of furnishing GSTR-1 for the month of March, 2019 only with the objective to enable the recipient assessee to claim input tax credit unavailed due to non-reflection of input tax credit in GSTR-2A of the recipient. The Removal of Difficulty Order does not permit any amendment in GSTR-3B return through which assessee pays tax. Consequently, credit notes/debit notes pertaining to financial year 2017-18 included in GSTR-1 but not reflected in GSTR-3B upto due date of furnishing GSTR-3B for the month of September, 2018 will not be considered while filing details in serial no. 10/11 of Part V of the annual return.   
 
The points as regards other aspects in filing annual return will be discussed in our next update. 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com