Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Airline levies

GST Update on Airline levies
GST Update on Airline levies
Government has issued a series of Circulars on 11th October 2019. In this update we shall discuss in detail one of the circulars being issued vide circular No. 115/34/2019-GST dated 11th October 2019. This circular intends to give clarification on issue of GST on Airport levies.   
In this circular, clarification is being given on taxability of GST on the charges like Passenger Service Fee (PSF) and User Development Fee (UDF) being collected by the Airlines on behalf of Airport operators from the passengers and the availment of credit with respect to such charges to the passengers. Passenger Service Fee (PSF) is collected by the airport licensee from embarking passengers at rates as specified by the Central Government which shall be utilized for infrastructure and facilitation of the passengers. User Development Fee (UDF) is being levied by the licensee at a major airport.
The above charges are subject to GST as these are consideration being received for services provided to Passengers. The definition of Consideration as per Section 2(31) of the CGST Act 2017 is being reproduced below
““consideration” in relation to the supply of goods or services or both includes––
(a) any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government;
(b) the monetary value of any act or forbearance, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government:
Provided that a deposit given in respect of the supply of goods or services or both shall not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the supplier applies such deposit as consideration for the said supply; “
In this case the airline acts as a Pure Agent between Airport operators and passengers, so the board clarifies that airline should separately indicate actual amount of PSF and UDF and GST payable on such PSF and UDF by the airport licensee, in the invoice issued by airlines to its passengers. The airline shall not be eligible to take credit on the GST paid on such charges. The amount so recovered from passengers as pure agent shall not be included in the value of supply made by airlines and so GST shall not be leviable. The Airline shall indicate in the invoice being raised to the passengers that the charges being collected are in the capacity of Pure Agent and GST is inclusive in it. This indicates that the registered passengers may take credit of GST paid on PSF and UDF on the basis of this invoice.
So it is the ultimate responsibility of the airport operators to pay GST on the PSF and UDF collected by them from the passengers through the airlines to the Government.
Let us summarize the above as follows
  • Airline Air Asia shall raise the invoice to the passengers as
Flight charges                                                 Rs. 5,000/-
(+) PSF(*)                                                      Rs. 500/-
(+) UDF(*)                                                     Rs. 500/-
Gross Total                                                     Rs. 6,000/-
(+) GST @ 18% (on Rs. 5000/-)                    Rs. 900/-
Net Total                                                         Rs. 6,900/-
(* PSF and UDF charges are being collected by us in the capacity of pure agent on behalf of Airport operators and is inclusive of GST)
  • Airport operator Chatrapathi Shivaji Airport shall deposit the GST payable on PSF and UDF to the government.
 
  • And the registered passengers shall be eligible to take ITC on the flight charges and on tax charged on PSF and UDF charges as well.
But the difficulty that shall arise here is that how can the registered passenger take ITC of the tax charged on PSF and UDF as this shall not be reflected in the GSTR-2A of the passenger. The airline will be acting as pure agent and will not pay the tax. Hence, they will not show the same in the GSTR-1 return. Consequently, it will not come in GSTR-2A of passenger. The airline operator will raise the bill in the name of airlines and not in the name of passenger. Thus, airline operator will file GSTR-1 and fill the details of airlines. But airlines will not take the credit on the same. But in any case, it will not come in the GSTR-2A of passenger. Then he will not be able to take the credit.
However, the circular says that the passenger can take the credit. Whether the circular go beyond the Act? Further, Notification No. 49/2019- central Tax was issued on 9th October, 2019 wherein Sub rule 3 of Rule 36 has been inserted which states that a registered person shall avail input tax credit in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have been not uploaded by the supplier in GSTR-2A only upto 20% of the eligible credit available of which have been uploaded on the portal.  
The complexities in GST have been increasing continuously irrespective of getting settled.

This is solely for educational Purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com