Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON ADMISSIBILITY OF GST EXEMPTION TO IIM

GST UPDATE ON ADMISSIBILITY OF GST EXEMPTION TO IIM
GST UPDATE ON ADMISSIBILITY OF GST EXEMPTION TO IIMs:
The Advance Rulings have pronounced contrary decisions as regards leviability of GST on the various courses offered by IIMs. The Authority for Advance Ruling Bangalore and Madhya Pradesh have concluded that when there is specific exemption available to IIM with respect to specific courses offered by it under serial no. 67 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, then, the benefit of general exemption as contained in serial no. 66(a) of the same exemption notification which is applicable to ‘educational institution’ will not be admissible to IIM even after enactment of IIM Act. However, on the contrary, the decision rendered by AAR Kolkata in case of Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta [2018-TIOL-242-AAR-GST] is entirely different from the decision as pronounced by AAR Bangalore and AAR Madhya Pradesh. The AAR Kolkata has opined that after the enactment of IIM Act, it is very well covered by the definition of educational institution for the purpose of general exemption under serial no. 66(a) of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2018. It was held that IIM being covered by the term educational institution is equally entitled for the benefit of both the entries being 66(a) and 67. It was also concluded that Supreme Court has held that if assessee is entitled for two benefits, it is at the option of the assessee to avail any benefit irrespective of the fact that the benefit is claimed under general exemption or specific exemption. Since there were contrary decisions on the issue, clarification from the government was the need of hour and recent clarification issued vide Circular No. 82/01/2019-GST dated 01.01.2019 has resolved the conflict as regards admissibility of exemption to IIM for courses other than those specifically mentioned in serial no. 67.
 
The circular has clarified the position as regards leviability of GST for different periods on the various courses offered by IIMs as follows:-
 01.07.2017 to 30.01.2018:-
IIMs were not covered by the term ‘educational institution’ and so were not eligible for the exemption under serial no. 66(a) of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). Consequently, IIMs were eligible for GST exemption only on specified courses as mentioned in serial no. 67 of the said notification no. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) which reads as follows:-
 (i) two-year full time Post Graduate Programmes in Management for the Post Graduate Diploma in Management, to which admissions are made on the basis of Common Admission Test (CAT) conducted by the Indian Institute of Management,
(ii) fellow programme in Management,
(iii)five years integrated programme in Management
Therefore, GST was payable on other courses offered by IIMs except the courses listed above.
W.e.f. 31.01.2018:-
Indian Institutes of Management Act, 2018 came into force on 31.01.2018  , ‘IIMs’ are educational institutions as they provide education as a part of curriculum for obtaining qualification recognised by law for the time being in force. Consequently, w.e.f. 31.01.2018, IIMs has the option to claim general exemption under serial no. 66(a) of the notification no. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) or specific exemption under serial no. 67 of the notification no. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The justification for availing exemption under either of the serial no. 66(a) and 67 is backed by decisions given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that if there are two or more exemption notifications available to the assessee, the assessee can claim the one that is more beneficial to him. However, IIMs are liable to pay GST at the rate of 18% for short term programs for executives/professionals as such programs are not for any qualification recognised by law.
 
Now, the clarification issued by the Tax Research Unit (Ministry of Finance) supports the view of Authority of Advance Ruling of Kolkata. However, as regards IIM, Bangalore and IIM, Madhya Pradesh is concerned, they are bound by the decision pronounced by the respective advance rulings according to the provisions contained in section 103 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, it is worth noting that the provision contained in sub-section (2) of the section 103 states that the advance ruling shall be binding unless the law, facts or circumstances supporting the original advance ruling have changed. It is worth mentioning that while pronouncing the decisions by Advance Ruling, the fact that IIM Act has been implemented with effect from 31.01.2018 was considered and adverse opinion was framed. Consequently, there is no change in the facts or circumstances supporting the original advance ruling. Now, the question arises is that whether issuance of clarification vide Circular can be considered as change in law so as to invoke the provisions of section 103(2) in case of IIM Bangalore and IIM Madhya Pradesh? Well, confusions are inbuilt in the newly implemented GST regime and are expected that the same would be resolved only after bearing of litigation cost by the helpless assessees.
The content of this GST update is for educational purpose only and not intended for solicitation.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com