Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE - Notification 11/2020 dated 21st March 2020 & Circular 134/04/2020 dt 23rd March 2020 & relating to the Companies Covered under the IBC,2016- Part 2

GST UPDATE - Notification 11/2020 dated 21st March 2020 & Circular 134/04/2020 dt 23rd March 2020 & relating to the Companies Covered under the IBC,2016- Part 2

 

In our earlier update, we have discussed special procedures Notified by CBIC vide Ntfn.No.11/2020 related to Registration, Filing of Returns & the availability of ITC which are to be followed by the Companies vis. Corporate Debtors who are undergoing the CIRP process and the management of whose affairs are being undertaken by IRP/RP.

The present update seeks to discuss Circular no.134/04/2020 dt 23rd March 2020 where the CG has clarified certain issues relating to the Companies under IBC Code 2016. The update is hereby divided in two parts i.e. issues arising before and during CIRP period:-

Issues during Pre-CIRP Period

Issue- Recovery of dues under GST for pre-CIRP period

Clarification-The circular clarified that no coercive action can be taken against the entity (vis. Corporate debtor) with respect to the dues for Pre-CIRP period. However, the proper officer may file the claims before the NCLT which are termed as operational debt as per the provisions of IBC. They shall seek the details of supplies made / received and total tax dues pending from the corporate debtor to file the claim before the NCLT. But there is no provision in GST law in this regard. Is the circular is enough to enforce the same. The provisions should have been incorporated to this effect in GST law. As we have seen that the circulars are not binding. Or else, we can assume that the IBC has superseding effect on provisions of GST law. But the provision should have been incorporated to end the disputes.

“Operational Debt is debt may arise out of provision of goods or services or dues arising out of employment or dues arising under any law for the time being in force and payable to the Centre/State Government”.

Moreover, a moratorium period may be imposed under IBC, wherein the institution of suits /pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor is prohibited.

 

Issue- Should the GST registration of corporate debtor be cancelled?

Clarification-No, the GST registration shall not be cancelled of an entity for which CIRP has been initiated. The proper officer may suspend the registration. In case the registration of an entity undergoing CIRP has already been cancelled and it is within the   period of revocation of cancellation of registration, it is advised that such cancellation may be revoked. Again there is no law provision in GST to do so. How a department officer will keep this pending without a legal backing? Whether GST portal will support the same? These questions should be answered and portal should be amended to do this exercise.

 

Issue- Filing of returnsby IRP/RP of pre-CIRP period

Clarification-As per the provisions of the IBC Code 2016 the IRP/RP is not under an obligation to comply with all legal requirements for period before the Insolvency Commencement Date, therefore, not liable to file returns of pre CIRP period.

But the portal does not support the same and as such IRP was not able to file the returns for next period without filing earlier period returns. Even the High Court has held that it should be allowed to file the same without filing earlier period returns. But portal cannot be operated on the individual basis. Hence, it has been provided that IBC will take a separate registration and file the returns in its new registration. Hence, a way out of new registration has been introduced so that IRP/RP can file the returns.

 

During the CIRP Period

 

Issue-Should a new registration be taken by the corporate debtor during the CIRP period?

Clarification-New registration has to be taken within 30 days of the appointment of the IRP/RP in respect of said class of persons, in each & every States /UTwhere the corporate debtor was registered earlier since they will be treated as a distinct person of the corporate debtor.

However, where the IRP/RP has been appointed prior to the date of notification 11/2020 dt.21st March 2020, he shall take registration within 30 days from the commencement of this notification i.e. up to 20th April 2020.

But earlier separate registration was granted only when the assesee has different business vertical. However, there will not be different business vertical as the same business is being run by IRP/RP. Moreover, now the registration can be granted at different locations of a person within same state. But here also, no different location exists. But the notification has provided that new registration will be allowed to him under special procedure.

 

 

Issue-How to file First Return after obtaining new registration?

Clarification-The IRP/RP will be liable to furnish first return under Sec 40 for            the period beginning the date on which it became liable to take registration till the date on which registration has been granted. The IRP/RP will also be liable to make payment of tax, file the returns and comply with all the provisions of the GST law during CIRP period.

 

Issue-How to avail ITC for invoices issued to the erstwhile registered person in case the IRP/RP has been appointed before issuance of Notification No.11/2020 - Central Tax, dated 21.03.2020 and no return has been filed by the IRP during the CIRP?

Clarification-The special procedure vide notification No.11/2020 - Central Tax, dated 21.03.2020issued under section 148 of the CGST Act has provided the manner of availment of ITC while furnishing the first return under section 40.We have already discussed this procedure in our previous part of update. This exception is made only for the first return filed under section 40 of the CGST Act.

A point worth to be noted here is that the time limit for availing the ITC as prescribed by Sec 16(4) shall not be applicable and the newly registered IRP/RP can avail the ITC after the time limit for the month of September or the filing of date of Annual Return too. Moreover, the limitation for the availment of ITC as per Rule 36(4) subject to 20% (now 10%) shall also not be applicable to the said class of persons

 

 

Issue-How to avail ITC for invoices by persons who are availing supplies from the corporate debtors undergoing CIRP, in cases where the IRP/RP was appointed before the issuance of the notification No.11/2020 - Central Tax, dated 21.03.2020?   

Clarification-Registered persons who are receiving supplies from the said class of persons shall, for the period from the date of appointment of IRP / RP till the date of registration as mentioned in this notification or 30 days from thedate of this notification, whichever is earlier, be eligible to avail ITC on invoices issued using the GSTIN of the erstwhile registered person, subject to the conditions of Chapter V of the CGST Act and rule made thereunder, except the provisions of sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules.

Again it will be interesting to see that invoice showing different GST number as well as GSTR-2A showing different GST number, the credit will be allowed. Even it will be very difficult for the assesee claiming credit. The accounting software will have the GST number as shown in invoice and GSTR-2A is showing different GST number under which IRP/RP has filed the return. It will be very difficult to reconcile the GSTR 2A.

Issue-Some of the IRP/RPs has made deposit in the cash ledger of erstwhile registration of the corporate debtor. How to claim refund for amount deposited in the cash ledger by the IRP/RP?

Clarification- Any amount deposited in the cash ledger by the IRP/RP, in the existing registration, from the date of appointment of IRP / RP to the date of notification No.11/2020 specifying the special procedure for corporate debtors undergoing CIRP, shall be available for refund to the erstwhile registration under the head refund of cash ledger, even if the relevant FORM GSTR-3B/GSTR-1are not filed for the said period.

Now, if the IRP/RP has filed the return for this period and this cash is adjusted then how the refund will come. Moreover, IRP/RP has to file again returns as per provision of notification as well as circular then whether the payment will be made twice? There is no clarification on this issue. It only says that they have to file return.

Further, it is not clarified that whether the IRP/RP will have to pay interest for the period. This will be clear from example. Suppose, this unit deposited the tax of Rs. 1,00,000/- in cash ledger of old registration. Now IRP/RP takes new registration and filed refund of Rs. 1,00,000/- . Unless this amount is received, IRP/RP does not file return in new registration. Now this refund is received in month of June. Now, IRP/RP will deposit this amount in new registration and file return. But the registration will ask for late fee and interest whereas there is no fault on the firm part as they have paid the tax. When it is going to be declared as insolvent and suffering from financial difficulty then how they will pay interest and late fee?

The instructions contained in Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dt. 18.11.2019 stands modified to this extent.

 

This is solely for educational purpose.


You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com