Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No. 91st ON ITC ADMISSIBILITY TO RWA HAVING COMMERCIAL SHOPS

GST UPDATE No. 91st ON ITC ADMISSIBILITY TO RWA HAVING COMMERCIAL SHOPS
The issue regarding taxability of contribution received by Resident Welfare Association (RWA) from its members as well as admissibility of ITC has always been a matter of dispute. Recently, the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of “M/S TVH LUMBINI SQUARE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, CHENNAI”, question was raised regarding taxability limit of the amount contributed by members to RWA. AAR held that in case contribution exceeds rs.7500/- per member per month then entire amount will be taxable. Moreover, circular no. 19/28/2019 has also clarified that GST will be payable only on amount exceeding Rs. 7500/- per member per month. However, a unique issue was raised before the Maharashtra AAR in the case of M/S VISHAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. wherein it was asked as to whether the society can surrender the GST registration as the contribution received by them is less than Rs. 7,500/- but there arecommercial shops also along with residential flats. Furthermore, question was also raised regarding the admissibility of input tax credit. The outcome of this decision is the subject matter of discussion of our present update. The AAR held that according to the circular no. 109/28/2019 GST dated 22.07.2019, RWA shall be required to pay GST on monthly subscription contribution charged from its members only if such subscription is more than Rs. 7,500/- per month per member and aggregate annual turnover of RWA by way of supplying goods and services is also Rs. 20 Lakhs or more. In the present case, though annual turnover is more than Rs. 20 Lakhs, monthly maintenance per month per member is less than Rs. 7,500/- but society has commercial shops along with residential flats and garages. The AAR held that since the question as to whether applicant is required to surrender their registration is not covered by the scope of advance ruling under section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017, the same is not answered. As regards admissibility of input tax credit on various works contract services availed by them is concerned, it was held that credit will not be available to the extent of capitalisation as mentioned in explanation to section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. AAR also concluded that with respect to admissibility of input tax credit on various services such as professional fees, bank charges, insurance premium, stationery items, security services etc. the applicant is eligible for availing proportionate input tax credit in proportion to commercial flats because GST is exempted on the contribution below Rs. 7,500/- pertaining to residential flats. The above decision seeks to highlight that the provision contained in section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 42 of the CGST Rules, 2017 pertaining to proportionate reversal will be applicable in case of projects where RWA is being set up for collecting contributions with respect to residential flats and commercial shops. However, the AAR does not clarify on the mechanism and computation aspect of such proportionate input tax credit. It is also worth mentioning that usually there are separate RWA for residential flats and commercial shops. Consequently, the common input tax credit will have to be apportioned in the ratio of commercial shops by considering the contribution received for residential flats as exempt. To illustrate- if the common credit is Rs. 10,00,000/- and the total contribution of RWA from residential flats is Rs. 25,00,000/- whereas the total contribution of RWA from commercial shops is Rs. 30,00,000/-; the computation of input tax credit admissible with respect to commercial shops would be = 10,00,000*30,00,000/55,00,000 being Rs. 5,45,455/-. Hence, the assessee will have to avail common credit to the extent of Rs. 5,45,455/- out of the total credit of Rs. 10,00,000/-. This would be definitely be a cumbersome task for the assessee and would add to the burden of compliance.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com