Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 338 on Circular by Kerala Government regarding amended GSTR-3B

GST Update No 338 on Circular by Kerala Government regarding amended GSTR-3B
Since the introduction of GST regime, the GSTR-3B underwent substantial changes of which one of the significant changes was methodology of making declaration regarding input tax credit which was introduced after 43rd GST Council meeting vide Notification No. 14/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022. To put an end to confusions and discussions on this issue and bring uniformity, recently Kerala GST Wing issued a Trade Circular No. 1/2022 dated 21.11.2022. The detailed analysis of this Circular is subject matter of our present update.
 
It is well known that in Table 4(A) of GSTR-3B pertaining to input tax credit, auto-populated input tax credit gets reflected from auto-drafted inward statement i.e. GSRT-2B. Further, the utilization of input tax credit against output tax liabilities as shown in Table 6 of GSTR-3B gets auto-populated from electronic credit ledger and also from Table 4(C)- Net ITC Available of GSTR-3B. However, with the amendment in method of declaring input tax credit, it is often observed that the taxpayers are facing confusions which results into wrong declaration of input tax credit in GSTR-3B. There had been instances wherein the taxpayers deduct the amount of ineligible input tax credit directly be editing the total input tax credit amount which is auto-populated in Table 4(A) of GSTR-3B. While in some cases it is observed that the taxpayers fail to declare ineligible input tax credit under Table 4(B) of GSTR-3B. This results into wrong utilization of ineligible credit and hence, the taxpayers shall be liable to reverse such credit along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a.
 
To put an end to all the tug-of-war between the department and the assessee, it is now stated that the total ITC (eligible and ineligible) which is auto-populated in Table 4A of GSTR-3B shall not be deducted with the amount of ineligible input tax credit. Hence, out of the input tax credit as shown under Table 4(A) of GSTR-3B, if input tax credit needs to be reversed on account of Rule 38, Rule 42 and 43 and Section 17(5) of CGST Act, 2017, the same shall be declared in Table 4(B) (1) of GSTR-3B. Furthermore, in case of reversal of ITC which are not permanent in nature and is reclaimable in future such as Rule 37, Section 16(2)(b), 16(2)(c) and input tax credit which was wrongly availed in any previous tax period due to inadvertent mistake shall be displayed in Table 4(B)(2) of GSTR-3B. The same may be reclaimed in future in n Table 4 (A) of GSTR-3B. All such reclaimed input tax credit shall also be shown in Table 4 (D) (1) of GSTR-3B. Hence, under Table 4(C) of GSTR-3B, “Net ITC available” shall be displayed which shall be 4A-[4B(1)+4B(2)]. Furthermore, input tax credit available as per Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 or where recipient is located in a different State / UT than that of place of supply shall be displayed in Table 4D(2) of GSTR-3B. However, in case ineligible or blocked input tax credit is availed wherein the time limit of filing rectification in GSTR-3B is expired, the reversal of input tax credit in such a case shall be made by filing GST DRC-03.
 
The above clarification is a welcoming clarification by the taxpayers wherein all the disputes and discussions are ended. However, it seems that now the taxpayers need to be more vigilant before filing GSTR-3B failing which adverse repercussions will be faced by them. It is highly anticipated that other state Governments shall also address this issue and issue suitable clarifications in this respect at the earliest possible.
 
 
 
 
 

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com