Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 293 on availability of ITC on vouchers of loyalty points

GST Update No 293 on availability of ITC on vouchers of loyalty points
The dispute as regards to admissibility of input tax credit on vouchers and subscription packages procured by the applicant from third party vendors for providing loyalty and reward points has been a matter of discussion since erstwhile indirect tax regime. The tug of war between the department and the taxpayers has now become a never-ending task wherein the departmental authorities are not willing to provide input tax credit on the same while taxpayers argue that it is admissible being a promotional expenditure incurred during the course of business. Recently, one more case was reported on parallel lines before Karnataka AAR in the case of M/S MYNTRA DESIGNS PRIVATE LIMITED. The analysis of this decision is the subject matter of discussion of our present update.
The applicant is a major fashion e-commerce company and owns e-commerce portal, engaged in the business of selling of fashion and lifestyle products. The suppliers intend to sell such products by listing them on portal and thereafter sell the product. Once the order is placed, the applicant collects money and settles the amount payable with the supplier. The applicant in order to increase the customer base and footfalls, proposes to run a loyalty program by issuing points to the customer on the basis of purchases effected to them. The participation in the said scheme shall be based on pre-defined eligibility criteria laid down by the applicant and the customer will be bound to accept the same. The advance ruling was therefore sought by the applicant as to whether the applicant would be eligible to avail input tax credit as per Section 16 on the vouchers and subscription packages procured by applicant from third party vendors that are made available to the eligible customers participating in loyalty programs.
The applicant procures the vouchers and subscription packages from third party vendors upon payment of GST and provide them to the customers. The applicant themselves is not engaged in business of supply of said vouchers andthe packages. The vendors will be raising invoices by classifying their outward supply as “other professional, technical and business services”. The expenditure incurred by the applicant in this respect is not capital expenditure and therefore, allowed under section 37(1) of Income Tax Act under “Profits and gains of business or profession”.The applicant referred to the definition of voucher and submitted that the time of supply would be date of issuance of voucher and hence, GST shall be levied accordingly. The applicant placed reliance on provisions of Section 16 of the Act and submitted that they are eligible to avail input tax credit on the same since, all the conditions of Section 16 are fulfilled. Further, it was submitted that procurement of voucher is “in the course of furtherance of business”. Further, the input tax credit on the same is not restricted or blocked as per Section 17 of the Act. It was further contended that vouchers shall be made available to the customers who wish to redeem the loyalty points and no monetary consideration will bereceived in place from the customer. Further, the loyalty points are not transferrable and cannot be converted into cash and used in place of cash. It was also argued that loyalty program ispurely commercial driven. Further, the input tax credit on the same is not blocked under Section 17(5)(h) of the Act, since the third party classifies the same as service and not goods and cannot be termed as “gift” also.The AAR referred to various provisions of CGST Act, 2017. It was stated that the subscription package would also qualify for the definition of voucher. Moving further, it was analysed as to whether the voucher would come under ambit of goods or services. Therefore, it was held that the said vouchers shall fall under “goods” since the definition is not restricted to “tangible” properties only. Instead, it refers to movable property which is capable of being transmitted and voucher is one of them. Further, reference was also drawn to the decision of Apex Court in the case of TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES V/S STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH and VIKAS SALES CORPORATION V/S CCE. Further, reference was made to Schedule II ofCGST Act, 2017 stating that the supply of voucher is supply of goods. Moreover, it was analysed that loyalty program is on basis of particular transaction which are having no monetary value and are non-transferrable. This implies that the customers shall receive the vouchers free of cost and hence, it is coveredunder the ambit of “gift” and covered under Section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, it was concluded that the input tax credit on the same shall not be available.The above decision is a setback for the industry since the business houses often introduce schemes like these to increase the customer base and profit margins. Although, there had been similar decision on earlier occasion on the same line by Tamil Nadu AAAR in the case of GRB DAIRY FOODS PVT. LTD. wherein it was held that no input tax credit can be claimed on gifts and rewards given without consideration. However, the issue needs to be re-visited as the term “gift” in normal parlance means anything given without any condition or expectation in return. However, in the present case, the vouchers are conditional as they are given on customer purchasing specified quantity of goods which intent to increase the sales base. Consequently, the said vouchers should not be treated as “gift” so as to deny the input tax credit of GST paid on procurement of such vouchers. A suitable clarification in this regard from the government iseagerly awaited.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com