Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 287 ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES IN AMENDED GSTR-3B PART-2

GST UPDATE No 287 ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES IN AMENDED GSTR-3B PART-2
The new format of GSTR-3B has been made applicable for the return filed for the month of August, 2022. In our earlier update, we have already highlighted some of the practical issues that are being faced by the assessees as regards presentation of data in the new format of GSTR-3B. In the present update, we seek to point out various other practical difficulties being faced by the assessees while filing their GSTR-3B in the new format.
We hereby discuss the various practical issues of presentation being faced by the assessees as follows:-
1. Treatment of rectification of invoice by the supplier which was wrongly reflected in GSTR-2B as it was not pertaining to the assessee:- At times, it happens that the supplier inadvertently uploads invoice in GSTR-1 under wrong assessee/GSTIN which results in reflection of invoice in the GSTR-2B of the wrong recipient. The reflection as regards invoice reflected in GSTR-2B but not
pertaining to the recipient has been dealt with in our earlier update. It is reiterated that the said ITC will be reflected in serial no. 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B. Now, the question arises is what would be the presentation when the supplier rectifies the mistake by amending the GSTR-1 wherein the taxable value and tax amount in the said invoice is amended as Zero. In such a scenario, it is being observed that the figure of all other ITC in serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B is auto-populated with reduced ITC. For example- invoice involving tax amount of Rs. 18,000/- was being wrongly reflected in the GSTR-2B of the recipient. Thereafter, the supplier amended the tax amount of the said invoice as zero due to which the auto populated ITC in table 4(A)(5) is being reflected with lesser amount by Rs. 18,000/-. The assessee will have to add back the amount of Rs. 18,000/- in serial no. 4(A)(5) as the said wrongly reflected ITC of Rs. 18,000/- has already been reversed by them under serial no. 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B filed for the prior period. This action will lead to deviation with the figure auto-populated in serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B.
2. ITC not available due to restriction contained in the Rate Notification:- It is submitted that the GST rate for certain goods or services is subject to the condition that the input tax credit shall not be availed by the supplier. For example- in case of restaurant services, GST rate of 5% is applicable subject to the condition of non availment of input tax credit. Now, the question arises is how to reflect the input tax credit which is being auto-populated in GSTR-2B of the restaurant supplier. The input tax credit will be auto-populated in the serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B. Now, the question arises is whether the reversal of said input tax credit will be reflected in table 4(B)(1) or 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B. The serial no. 4(B)(1) pertains to credit as per Rule 38, 42 and 43 of the CGST Rules and section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is worth noting that the said input tax credit is not restricted under section 17(5) or any of the specified Rules so serial no. 4(B)(1) is not appropriate head for reflection of such ITC. Moreover, ITC at serial no. 4(B)(2) under the category “others” has been interpreted to mean the ITC which is to be re-claimed in future such as that pertaining to goods in transit or non-payment of consideration to the supplier of
goods within a period of 180 days from the date of issuance of invoice. It is submitted that as the input tax credit restricted under rate notification is not to be re-claimed in future, reflection of such credit under the serial no. 4(B)(2) of GSTR-3B is not appropriate. However, as there is no other option available for reflection of such input tax credit, the assessees will have to report the said ITC under serial no. 4(B)(2) of the new format. This will resultantly lead to raising of query by the department as the re-claimed amount of credit under serial no. 4(D)(1) would not tally with the figure reported in serial no. 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B.
It is hoped that the government issues suitable clarification to resolve various presentational disputes at the earliest possible so that proper compliance of filing GSTR-3B in the new format is being done by the assessee.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com