Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 287 ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES IN AMENDED GSTR-3B PART-2

GST UPDATE No 287 ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES IN AMENDED GSTR-3B PART-2
The new format of GSTR-3B has been made applicable for the return filed for the month of August, 2022. In our earlier update, we have already highlighted some of the practical issues that are being faced by the assessees as regards presentation of data in the new format of GSTR-3B. In the present update, we seek to point out various other practical difficulties being faced by the assessees while filing their GSTR-3B in the new format.
We hereby discuss the various practical issues of presentation being faced by the assessees as follows:-
1. Treatment of rectification of invoice by the supplier which was wrongly reflected in GSTR-2B as it was not pertaining to the assessee:- At times, it happens that the supplier inadvertently uploads invoice in GSTR-1 under wrong assessee/GSTIN which results in reflection of invoice in the GSTR-2B of the wrong recipient. The reflection as regards invoice reflected in GSTR-2B but not
pertaining to the recipient has been dealt with in our earlier update. It is reiterated that the said ITC will be reflected in serial no. 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B. Now, the question arises is what would be the presentation when the supplier rectifies the mistake by amending the GSTR-1 wherein the taxable value and tax amount in the said invoice is amended as Zero. In such a scenario, it is being observed that the figure of all other ITC in serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B is auto-populated with reduced ITC. For example- invoice involving tax amount of Rs. 18,000/- was being wrongly reflected in the GSTR-2B of the recipient. Thereafter, the supplier amended the tax amount of the said invoice as zero due to which the auto populated ITC in table 4(A)(5) is being reflected with lesser amount by Rs. 18,000/-. The assessee will have to add back the amount of Rs. 18,000/- in serial no. 4(A)(5) as the said wrongly reflected ITC of Rs. 18,000/- has already been reversed by them under serial no. 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B filed for the prior period. This action will lead to deviation with the figure auto-populated in serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B.
2. ITC not available due to restriction contained in the Rate Notification:- It is submitted that the GST rate for certain goods or services is subject to the condition that the input tax credit shall not be availed by the supplier. For example- in case of restaurant services, GST rate of 5% is applicable subject to the condition of non availment of input tax credit. Now, the question arises is how to reflect the input tax credit which is being auto-populated in GSTR-2B of the restaurant supplier. The input tax credit will be auto-populated in the serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B. Now, the question arises is whether the reversal of said input tax credit will be reflected in table 4(B)(1) or 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B. The serial no. 4(B)(1) pertains to credit as per Rule 38, 42 and 43 of the CGST Rules and section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is worth noting that the said input tax credit is not restricted under section 17(5) or any of the specified Rules so serial no. 4(B)(1) is not appropriate head for reflection of such ITC. Moreover, ITC at serial no. 4(B)(2) under the category “others” has been interpreted to mean the ITC which is to be re-claimed in future such as that pertaining to goods in transit or non-payment of consideration to the supplier of
goods within a period of 180 days from the date of issuance of invoice. It is submitted that as the input tax credit restricted under rate notification is not to be re-claimed in future, reflection of such credit under the serial no. 4(B)(2) of GSTR-3B is not appropriate. However, as there is no other option available for reflection of such input tax credit, the assessees will have to report the said ITC under serial no. 4(B)(2) of the new format. This will resultantly lead to raising of query by the department as the re-claimed amount of credit under serial no. 4(D)(1) would not tally with the figure reported in serial no. 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B.
It is hoped that the government issues suitable clarification to resolve various presentational disputes at the earliest possible so that proper compliance of filing GSTR-3B in the new format is being done by the assessee.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com