Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE NO 286 ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES IN AMENDED GSTR-3B

GST UPDATE NO 286 ON PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES IN AMENDED GSTR-3B
The new format of GSTR-3B has been made applicable for the return filed for the month of August, 2022. We have already highlighted the complexities and the increased compliance burden on the assessee due to revised GSTR-3B format requiring proper accounting and presentation of ineligible input tax credit. In the present update, we seek to point out various other practical difficulties being faced by the assessees while filing their GSTR-3B in the new format.
Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to briefly summarise the changes made in the revised GSTR-3B format. Serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B pertains to all other ITC which will have figure of credit auto-populated from GSTR-2B. Serial no. 4(B) comprises of the details of ITC reversed. Serial no. 4(B)(1) pertains to ITC reversed as per Rule 38, 42, and 43 of CGST Rules and section 17(5). Moreover, serial no. 4(B)(2) will comprise of other reversal of credit. The matter does not end here as the assessee is also required to furnish the other details in serial no. 4(D). As per serial no. 4(D)(1), details of ITC reclaimed which was reversed under table 4(B)(2) in earlier tax period is to be reflected while in serial no. 4(D)(2), ineligible ITC under section 16(4) and ITC restricted due to POS provisions is to be reported.
We hereby discuss the various practical issues of presentation being faced by the assessees as follows:-
1. Treatment of non-issuance of credit note by the supplier for sales returns/short receipt:- At times, it is observed that there is short receipt of goods or sales returns for which the supplier does not issue any credit note. Resultantly, the recipient issues debit note and reverses the applicable input tax credit. The question arises is how to reflect the said input tax credit in the revised GSTR-3B. As the credit note is not being reflected in GSTR-2B, the recipient assessee needs to voluntarily reverse the proportionate input tax credit. The recipient assessee will reverse the credit in serial no. 4(B)(2) of the GSTR-3B on the basis of debit note raised by it. However, there is no clarity as to the treatment when the supplier actually issues the credit note and the same is being reflected in GSTR-2B subsequently. In such a situation, theserial no. 4(A)(5) will be auto-populated with lower input tax credit in the month in which the credit note is being reflected by the supplier but in reality, the assessee had already reversed the applicable input tax credit in earlier GSTR-3B. Now, the question arises is whether the recipient assessee can make adjustment by including such credit in serial no. 4(A)(5) when the credit note is being reflected in GSTR-3B? Moreover, will the recipient assessee need to reflect such credit in serial no. 4(D)(1) simultaneously? This will require the assessee to keep track record of debit notes and credit notes that are being reflected in GSTR-2B which will be a herculean task. A suitable clarification needs to be issued to address this difficulty by the government at the earliest possible.
2. Invoice reflected in GSTR-2A does not pertain to the assessee:- It is possible that certain invoices that are being reflected in GSTR-2A do not pertain to the assessee. However, with the revised format in operation, even such credit which do not pertain to the assessee will be part of serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B. Consequently, the assessee will reflect the said credit in serial no. 4(B)(2) as other credit reversal. But as per interpretation, this column stands for the credit to be claimed later on. But this credit is not to be claimed by taxpayer , hence a view is formed that it should be shown in 4(B)(1). But this is for specific clause of Rule, 42 and 43 of CGST Rules and Section 17(5) of CGST Act. Hence, it should be shown A(B)(2) only. This should be clarified by the department.
3. Invoice not received but the input tax credit reflected in GSTR-2B:- It is submitted that as input tax credit can be availed only when the assessee is in possession of valid GST invoice, the said credit will be reflected in serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B. Consequently, the assessee will reflect the said credit in serial no. 4(B)(1) if it is certain that the credit is ineligible. However, if the assessee is not sure whether the credit is eligible or ineligible, the said credit will be reflected in serial no. 4(B)(2) as other credit reversal. However, on receipt of valid GST invoice, such credit will have to be reflected in serial no. 4(A)(5) and 4(D)(1) if the credit is under eligible category. Again the ambiguity raised in earlier point will be raised. Hence, a suitable clarification from CBIC is solicited.
4. Invoice pertains to July month and reflected in GSTR-2B of July month but omitted from claiming in GSTR-3B:- There may be situation that invoice for the month of July, 2022 was omitted
from claiming in GSTR-3B which is now being claimed in the month of August, 2022. However, the said invoice was already reflected in GSTR-2B of July, 2022 and was also booked in the accounts of assessee. In such a case, the assessee will have to report the input tax credit pertaining to the said invoice in serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B of August, 2022. Moreover, the said credit also needs to be reflected in serial no. 4(D)(1) of the GSTR-3B as the inflated credit of serial no. 4(A)(5) needs to be re-conciled by the assessee. This is on the assumption that the assessee is in a way re-claiming the said input tax credit in the month of August, 2022 which was reflected in GSTR-2B of July month but could not be claimed for clerical mistake. It is to be assumed that omission is as good as reversing the said credit, similar to the situation of goods in transit. Although, some experts may opine that such an interpretation would lead to retrospective application of the new format which is not legally valid. A suitable clarification is needed from the government on this point.
5. Invoice pertains to June, 2022 but reflected in GSTR-2B of August, 2022 and booked in the month of August, 2022:- There may be situation that supplier has filed belated GSTR-1 for an invoice pertaining to the month of June, 2022 due to which the credit pertaining to the said invoice is being reflected in GSTR-2B of August, 2022. As the said invoice was not reflected in GSTR-2B for the month of June, 2022, the assessee did not record the said credit in their books of accounts. Now, the assessee will have to report the said credit pertaining to invoice raised in the month of June, 2022 in serial no. 4(A)(5) of the GSTR-3B. However, it is not required to reflect such credit in serial no. 4(D)(1) of the GSTR-3B because the said credit was not accounted for by the assessee in their books of accounts earlier.
The above problems are only illustrative and the actual difficulties will be encountered when the GSTR-3B returns are being regularly filed in the new format. It is hoped that the government issues suitable clarification to resolve various presentational disputes at the earliest possible so that objective of ease of doing business is achieved.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com