Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 263 ON TAXABILITY OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNDER RCM:-

GST UPDATE No 263 ON TAXABILITY OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNDER RCM:-
The recent 47th GST Council Meeting had introduced payment of GST on services by way of renting of residential dwelling to a registered person under reverse charge mechanism. However, there are lot many issues that need clarification from the part of government. The present update seeks to discuss the various complexities of the amendment made and their GST implications thereon.
 
It is submitted that the exemption entry no. 12 of the notification no. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 regarding renting of residential dwelling has been amended which reads as follows:-
“Services by way of renting of residential dwelling for use as residence except where the residential dwelling is rented to a registered person.”
 
In contrast, the entry no. 5AA inserted in the notification no. 05/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022 pertaining to reverse charge mechanism reads as follows:-
“Services by way of renting of residential dwelling to a registered person.”
 
It is worth mentioning that the reverse charge notification simply mentions “renting of residential dwelling” and does not specify the usage of such residential dwelling. However, the exemption entry specifically uses the phrase “renting of residential dwelling for use as residence”. Now, the question arises is that whether renting of residential dwelling for use as office attract GST under reverse charge mechanism if given on rent to registered person. If the language of the reverse charge notification is examined, it can be inferred that renting of residential dwelling, even for purpose other than use as residence would attract GST under reverse charge mechanism as if at all the intention was otherwise, the language would have specifically mentioned the phrase “renting of residential dwelling for use as residence”. Hence, a clarification in this respect is much needed from the government.
 
Furthermore, the registered recipient would be required to pay GST under reverse charge mechanism but the question arises is the determination of the nature of tax to be paid. According to section 12(3)(b) of the IGST Act, 2017, the place of supply of services by way of lodging accommodation by a hotel, inn, guest house, home stay, club or campsite, by whatever name called, and including a house boat or any other vessel shall be the location at which the immovable property or boat or vessel, as the case may be, is located or intended to be located.  Hence, in case of renting of residential dwelling, the place of supply will be the location of such residential dwelling. The nature of tax that will be leviable depends on the location of the supplier and the place of supply. The determination of the nature of tax is explained with the help of following examples:-
 
LOCATION OF SUPPLIER LOCATION OF RECIPIENT LOCATION OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING PLACE OF SUPPLY NATURE OF TAX WHETHER REGISTRATION TO BE TAKEN BY RECIPIENT?
Maharashtra Rajasthan Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra CGST/SGST Yes, in the state of Maharashtra
Maharashtra Rajasthan Rajasthan Rajasthan IGST No need to take registration
Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra CGST/SGST No need to take registration
 
It is to be noted that in case where the location of supplier and the location of residential dwelling is in the State other than the state of recipient of service, the receiver is liable to pay the CGST/SGST of the State in which location of service provider is located; for which registration is required to be taken by the recipient in such State. Hence, in the situation no. 1 in the above table, the service recipient is liable to get registered in the State of Maharashtra for discharging its GST liability under reverse charge mechanism. This will lead to unnecessary compliance burden on the service recipient as they need to obtain normal GST registration also in Maharashtra. For example- if the residential dwelling is used as guest house by employees of the company, the said company will need to obtain normal GST registration for making payment of tax under RCM. However, the input tax credit of the tax so paid will not be available as it will be objected as restricted under section 17(5)(g) of the CGST Act, 2017 as goods or services or both used for personal consumption which will be considered as cost to the company. On the contrary, if the residential dwelling is being used for commercial purposes such as a marketing office, the recipient will need to obtain the normal GST registration in Maharashtra and ISD registration in Maharashtra so that the input tax credit of tax so paid by the normal registration in Maharashtra can be transferred to the recipient registered in Rajasthan via ISD located in Maharashtra.
 
The complexities as pointed out needs to be resolved by the government by issuing a suitable clarification so that unnecessary compliance burden can be avoided
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com