Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 263 ON TAXABILITY OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNDER RCM:-

GST UPDATE No 263 ON TAXABILITY OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNDER RCM:-
The recent 47th GST Council Meeting had introduced payment of GST on services by way of renting of residential dwelling to a registered person under reverse charge mechanism. However, there are lot many issues that need clarification from the part of government. The present update seeks to discuss the various complexities of the amendment made and their GST implications thereon.
 
It is submitted that the exemption entry no. 12 of the notification no. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 regarding renting of residential dwelling has been amended which reads as follows:-
“Services by way of renting of residential dwelling for use as residence except where the residential dwelling is rented to a registered person.”
 
In contrast, the entry no. 5AA inserted in the notification no. 05/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022 pertaining to reverse charge mechanism reads as follows:-
Services by way of renting of residential dwelling to a registered person.
 
It is worth mentioning that the reverse charge notification simply mentions “renting of residential dwelling” and does not specify the usage of such residential dwelling. However, the exemption entry specifically uses the phrase “renting of residential dwelling for use as residence”. Now, the question arises is that whether renting of residential dwelling for use as office attract GST under reverse charge mechanism if given on rent to registered person. If the language of the reverse charge notification is examined, it can be inferred that renting of residential dwelling, even for purpose other than use as residence would attract GST under reverse charge mechanism as if at all the intention was otherwise, the language would have specifically mentioned the phrase “renting of residential dwelling for use as residence”. Hence, a clarification in this respect is much needed from the government.
 
Furthermore, the registered recipient would be required to pay GST under reverse charge mechanism but the question arises is the determination of the nature of tax to be paid. According to section 12(3)(b) of the IGST Act, 2017, the place of supply of services by way of lodging accommodation by a hotel, inn, guest house, home stay, club or campsite, by whatever name called, and including a house boat or any other vessel shall be the location at which the immovable property or boat or vessel, as the case may be, is located or intended to be located.  Hence, in case of renting of residential dwelling, the place of supply will be the location of such residential dwelling. The nature of tax that will be leviable depends on the location of the supplier and the place of supply. The determination of the nature of tax is explained with the help of following examples:-
 
LOCATION OF SUPPLIER LOCATION OF RECIPIENT LOCATION OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING PLACE OF SUPPLY NATURE OF TAX WHETHER REGISTRATION TO BE TAKEN BY RECIPIENT?
Maharashtra Rajasthan Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra CGST/SGST Yes, in the state of Maharashtra
Maharashtra Rajasthan Rajasthan Rajasthan IGST No need to take registration
Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra CGST/SGST No need to take registration
 
It is to be noted that in case where the location of supplier and the location of residential dwelling is in the State other than the state of recipient of service, the receiver is liable to pay the CGST/SGST of the State in which location of service provider is located; for which registration is required to be taken by the recipient in such State. Hence, in the situation no. 1 in the above table, the service recipient is liable to get registered in the State of Maharashtra for discharging its GST liability under reverse charge mechanism. This will lead to unnecessary compliance burden on the service recipient as they need to obtain normal GST registration also in Maharashtra. For example- if the residential dwelling is used as guest house by employees of the company, the said company will need to obtain normal GST registration for making payment of tax under RCM. However, the input tax credit of the tax so paid will not be available as it will be objected as restricted under section 17(5)(g) of the CGST Act, 2017 as goods or services or both used for personal consumption which will be considered as cost to the company. On the contrary, if the residential dwelling is being used for commercial purposes such as a marketing office, the recipient will need to obtain the normal GST registration in Maharashtra and ISD registration in Maharashtra so that the input tax credit of tax so paid by the normal registration in Maharashtra can be transferred to the recipient registered in Rajasthan via ISD located in Maharashtra.
 
The complexities as pointed out needs to be resolved by the government by issuing a suitable clarification so that unnecessary compliance burden can be avoided
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com