Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 241 on pre-packaged and labelled goods

GST Update No 241 on pre-packaged and labelled goods
The applicability of different tax rates on branded and non-branded food items or the grant of exemptions on the condition that the goods are not sold under brand name has its roots from erstwhile GST regime. In the 47th GST Council Meeting, it was recommended to revise the scope of exemption and exempt only those items which are not “pre-packaged and labelled” in accordance with Legal Metrology Act vide Notification No. 06/2022-Central Tax Rate dated 13.07.2022. Further, the Tax Research Unit has also issued FAQs on 17.07.2022 on the subject matter under consideration to address the difficulties and issues faced by the trade and industry. The notification and FAQs released in this respect are subject matter of our present update. The present notification has widened the scope wherein concept of branded and unbranded food items has been completely replaced by concept of “Pre-packaged and labelled” goods. It is further clarified vide the said notification that the term “pre-packaged commodity” is defined in Section 2(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (LMR) as the package in which the commodity is pre-packed or a label is securely affixed thereto to bear the declarations under the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and the rules made thereunder. It is pertinent to mention that the LMR defines the pre-packaged commodity as “a commodity which without the purchaser being present is placed in a package of whatever nature, whether sealed or not, so that the product contained therein has a pre-determined quantity.” Therefore, the supply would be covered under the ambit of GST provided it is pre-packaged product and kept ready for sale whether it is sealed or otherwise and it requires declaration in accordance with provisions of LMR Act. Aligning with the above, it can be concluded that both the retail trade and wholesale trade stands taxable. This is analysed after having a detailed discussion on provisions related toTrade wherein it is prescribed that provisions of the LMR shall not apply in following cases: 1. Single Packages of commodities containing quantity of more than 25kgs or 25 Ltrs. 2. Cement, fertilizer and agricultural farm produce sold in bags above 50 kgs 3. Packaged commodities meant for industrial consumers or institutional consumers Consequently, notified products stated above will be eligible for exemption and therefore, shall not be taxable. Accordingly, GST would be attracted on supply of such goods provided the pre-packaged commodity is supplied in packages containing quantities less than or equal to 25kgs. Various issues on this were raised before Government seeking clarification as regards to applicability of GST in case several packages are sold out to customer. To illustrate, what will happen if 10 packages of 10kgs each are sold in a larger pack? The Government communicated via FAQ that in such a scenario, since these individual packages are meant for eventual sale to customer, GST would be levied. Question were also raised as regards to the fact that whether the retailer is liable to collect GST even if loose quantities from the package is supplied. In this respect, it was clarified that supply by retailer is not a supply of packaged commodity and therefore, no GST shall be attracted in the said transaction. However, a package of rice of 50 kgs will not attract GST even if LMR Act makes it mandatory to provide certain declaration in this respect. On the other hand, in case of rice millers for example, selling packages of 20 Kgs rice and would be required to make declaration being covered under pre-packaged and labelled commodity for GST purposes and thereby, GST shall be attracted on same. As far as wholesale trade is concerned, the scope of LMR is as follows: 1. 10 or more retail packages sold as one pack to an end consumer will also get covered under ‘wholesale package’ 2. Any number of retail packages sold as one package to intermediary and not to a single consumer From the above it is crystal clear that the GST would be attracted on entire supply chain i.e. from wholesaler to retailer to end consumer. The intention behind incorporating this is to keep entire supply chain within the ambit of tax and support the view of seamless flow of input tax credit.Clarification was also sought regarding taxability if pre-packaged commodity is supplied for consumption to industrial consumers or institutions. The question is answered by stating that the said supply is excluded from the purview of the LMR Act, and therefore, no GST shall be attracted on the same. The government has complicated the exemption by introducing the concept of “pre-packaged and labelled goods”, which also makes reference to the provisions contained in the Legal Metrology Act. The taxpayers would now have to be vigilant as regards the applicability of the provisions of Legal Metrology Act on the “pre-packaged and labelled goods” supplied by them as it is possible that no GST is applicable if their product does not require declaration to be made under the Legal Metrology Act.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com