Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 241 on pre-packaged and labelled goods

GST Update No 241 on pre-packaged and labelled goods
The applicability of different tax rates on branded and non-branded food items or the grant of exemptions on the condition that the goods are not sold under brand name has its roots from erstwhile GST regime. In the 47th GST Council Meeting, it was recommended to revise the scope of exemption and exempt only those items which are not “pre-packaged and labelled” in accordance with Legal Metrology Act vide Notification No. 06/2022-Central Tax Rate dated 13.07.2022. Further, the Tax Research Unit has also issued FAQs on 17.07.2022 on the subject matter under consideration to address the difficulties and issues faced by the trade and industry. The notification and FAQs released in this respect are subject matter of our present update. The present notification has widened the scope wherein concept of branded and unbranded food items has been completely replaced by concept of “Pre-packaged and labelled” goods. It is further clarified vide the said notification that the term “pre-packaged commodity” is defined in Section 2(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (LMR) as the package in which the commodity is pre-packed or a label is securely affixed thereto to bear the declarations under the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and the rules made thereunder. It is pertinent to mention that the LMR defines the pre-packaged commodity as “a commodity which without the purchaser being present is placed in a package of whatever nature, whether sealed or not, so that the product contained therein has a pre-determined quantity.” Therefore, the supply would be covered under the ambit of GST provided it is pre-packaged product and kept ready for sale whether it is sealed or otherwise and it requires declaration in accordance with provisions of LMR Act. Aligning with the above, it can be concluded that both the retail trade and wholesale trade stands taxable. This is analysed after having a detailed discussion on provisions related toTrade wherein it is prescribed that provisions of the LMR shall not apply in following cases: 1. Single Packages of commodities containing quantity of more than 25kgs or 25 Ltrs. 2. Cement, fertilizer and agricultural farm produce sold in bags above 50 kgs 3. Packaged commodities meant for industrial consumers or institutional consumers Consequently, notified products stated above will be eligible for exemption and therefore, shall not be taxable. Accordingly, GST would be attracted on supply of such goods provided the pre-packaged commodity is supplied in packages containing quantities less than or equal to 25kgs. Various issues on this were raised before Government seeking clarification as regards to applicability of GST in case several packages are sold out to customer. To illustrate, what will happen if 10 packages of 10kgs each are sold in a larger pack? The Government communicated via FAQ that in such a scenario, since these individual packages are meant for eventual sale to customer, GST would be levied. Question were also raised as regards to the fact that whether the retailer is liable to collect GST even if loose quantities from the package is supplied. In this respect, it was clarified that supply by retailer is not a supply of packaged commodity and therefore, no GST shall be attracted in the said transaction. However, a package of rice of 50 kgs will not attract GST even if LMR Act makes it mandatory to provide certain declaration in this respect. On the other hand, in case of rice millers for example, selling packages of 20 Kgs rice and would be required to make declaration being covered under pre-packaged and labelled commodity for GST purposes and thereby, GST shall be attracted on same. As far as wholesale trade is concerned, the scope of LMR is as follows: 1. 10 or more retail packages sold as one pack to an end consumer will also get covered under ‘wholesale package’ 2. Any number of retail packages sold as one package to intermediary and not to a single consumer From the above it is crystal clear that the GST would be attracted on entire supply chain i.e. from wholesaler to retailer to end consumer. The intention behind incorporating this is to keep entire supply chain within the ambit of tax and support the view of seamless flow of input tax credit.Clarification was also sought regarding taxability if pre-packaged commodity is supplied for consumption to industrial consumers or institutions. The question is answered by stating that the said supply is excluded from the purview of the LMR Act, and therefore, no GST shall be attracted on the same. The government has complicated the exemption by introducing the concept of “pre-packaged and labelled goods”, which also makes reference to the provisions contained in the Legal Metrology Act. The taxpayers would now have to be vigilant as regards the applicability of the provisions of Legal Metrology Act on the “pre-packaged and labelled goods” supplied by them as it is possible that no GST is applicable if their product does not require declaration to be made under the Legal Metrology Act.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com