Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 240 on rationalisation of GST on fly ash bricks

GST Update No 240 on rationalisation of GST on fly ash bricks
The ambiguity as regards applicability of GST rate on fly ash bricks is prevalent in the minds of taxpayers since complicated amendment was made simultaneously vide notification no. 04/2022-Central Tax dated 31.03.2022, 03/2022-Central Tax dated 31.03.2022, 01/2022-Central Tax (Rate) and 01/2022-Integrated Tax (Rate) and 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) and 02/2022-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022. The in-depth analysis of the amendments carried out by the above-mentioned notifications can be referred in our earlier GST Update No. 172 titled “Complicated Re-structuring of rates for fly ash bricks.” Recently, in the 47th GST Council meeting, the issue was addressed again and the GST rates on fly ash bricks have been rationalised further. Therefore, CBIC issued couple of notifications in the similar fashion vide Notification No. 06/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022, Notification No. 10/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022, Notification No. 15/2022-Central Tax dated 13.07.2022 and Notification No. 16/2022-Central Tax dated 13.07.2022. The detailedanalysis of these notifications is the subject matter of discussion of our present update. 
 
We hereby provide the comparative analysis of the amendments made in this regard as follows:-
OLD PROVISION Notification No. 01/2022-Central Tax (Rate)  dated 31.03.2022
 
 
 
This notification seeks to prescribe CGST rate of 6% with ITC on “fly ash bricks or fly ash aggregate with 90% or more fly ash content; fly ash blocks”
NEW PROVISION Notification No. 06/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022
 
The amended provision seeks to delete the condition of 90% or more fly ash content thereby leading to the conclusion that the GST rate of 6% with ITC would be applicable for fly ash bricks, fly ash aggregates, fly ash blocks.
 

OLD PROVISION

Notification No. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022

 

 

 

This notification seeks to prescribe the CGST rate of 3% on “fly ash bricks or fly ash aggregate with 90% or more fly ash content; fly ash blocks” with the condition that credit of input tax charged on goods or services used exclusively in supplying such goods has not been taken. Moreover, such goods are to be considered as exempt supply attracting the provisions of credit reversal as contained in section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.

NEW PROVISION

Notification No. 10/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022

 

The amended provision seeks to delete the condition of 90% or more fly ash content thereby leading to the conclusion that the concessional rate of 3% would be applicable for fly ash bricks, fly ash aggregates, fly ash blocks.

 

OLD PROVISION

Notification No. 03/2022-Central Tax  dated 31.03.2022

[Principal Notification No. 10/2019-Central Tax dated 07.03.2019]

The enhanced threshold limit of Rs. 40 Lakhs will not be applicable for goods such as “fly ash bricks or fly ash aggregate with 90% or more fly ash content; fly ash blocks” whereas the general threshold exemption of Rs. 20 Lakhs would be applicable for the suppliers of said goods.

NEW PROVISION

Notification no. 15/2022-Central Tax dated 13.07.2022

The amended provision seeks to delete the condition of 90% or more fly ash content thereby leading to the conclusion that the enhanced threshold limit of Rs. 40 Lakhs would not be applicable for fly ash bricks, fly ash aggregates, fly ash blocks.

 

OLD PROVISION

Notification No. 04/2022-Central Tax  dated 31.03.2022

[Principal Notification No. 14/2019-Central Tax dated 07.03.2019]

This notification seeks to amend notification no. 14/2019-Central Tax dated 07.03.2019 wherein the threshold limit for availing composition scheme benefit under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 was extended to Rs. 1.5 Crores. This notification debars the manufacturers of “fly ash bricks or fly ash aggregate with 90% or more fly ash content; fly ash blocks” from availing the benefit of composition scheme thereby meaning that only traders can opt for composition scheme.

NEW PROVISION

Notification no. 16/2022-Central Tax dated 13.07.2022

The amended provision seeks to delete the condition of 90% or more fly ash content thereby leading to the conclusion that the manufacturers of fly ash bricks, fly ash aggregates, fly ash blocks are debarred from availing benefit of composition scheme and only traders can opt for the same.

 

 

The above initiative of the government in deleting the condition of having 90% or more fly ash content is welcoming as it seeks to bring uniformity and avoid confusion.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com