Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 229 on proposed change in formula for refund of inverted duty structure

GST Update No 229 on proposed change in formula for refund of inverted duty structure
A new concept of granting refund where accumulation of credit is on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output was introduced in GST law with a view to provide relief to the sectors covered under inverted duty structure. However, there has been ambiguity as regards refund claim since inception as regards the formula is concerned and the fact that input services and capital goods are not considered while computing the refund claim under this mechanism. Moreover, the Supreme Court decision in the case of V.K.C. FOOTSTEPS INDIA PVT. LTD. has added fuel to the fire of litigation by holding that the formula prescribed for the computation of refund claim is faulty as it seeks to discriminate amongst the assessees having credit of inputs in their electronic credit ledger as compared to those having credit of input and input services both in their electronic credit ledger. The Apex Court had mentioned in the order that the GST Council should consider revising the formula of computation of refund of accumulated credit under the inverted duty structure. The recently held 47th GST Council meeting has proposed amendment in the said formula which is the subject matter of discussion of our present update. 
 
The hon’ble Supreme Court stated in its order that a possible solution for removing the anomaly in the formula can be that the Rule itself provides for a statutory assumption or a deeming fiction of utilisation of certain percentage of ITC on input services towards the payment of output tax for the purpose of calculation of refund. Our GST update no. ………. on analysis of the SC decision may be referred for the sake of better understanding. It appears that the GST Council has accepted the suggestion put forth by the Supreme Court and has proposed the following amendment in the recently held GST Council Meeting:-
 
Amendment in formula prescribed in sub-rule (5) of rule 89 of CGST Rules, 2017 for calculation of refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit on account of inverted rated structure
a. Change in formula for calculation of refund under rule 89(5) to take into account utilization of ITC on account of inputs and input services for payment of output tax on inverted rated supplies in the same ratio in which ITC has been availed on inputs and input services during the said tax period. This would help those taxpayers who are availing ITC on input services also.
 
Although, the notification proposing the amendment has not been released till date but an attempt is being made to explain the change that has been proposed to be implemented in the formula. To have an in-depth clarity, the amendment can be understood with the help of following example:
 
Details of Outward Supplies:
S. No. Particulars Amount (in Rs.)
1. Turnover of inverted duty structure 500 Lakhs
2. GST @ 5% 25 Lakhs
3. Turnover of other supply 700 Lakhs
4. GST @ 28% 196 Lakhs
5. Total Adjusted Turnover 1200 Lakhs
 
Details of Inward Supplies:
S. No. Particulars Amount (in Rs.)
1. 12% inputs 12 Lakhs
2. 28% inputs 56 Lakhs
3. Input Services 18 Lakhs
4. Capital Goods @28% 14 Lakhs
 
Refund as per Existing Formula:
Maximum Refund Amount= {(Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and services) x Net ITC / Adjusted Total Turnover} - tax payable on such inverted rated supply of goods and services.
Net ITC would comprise of 12% inputs and 28% inputs because input services and capital goods are not eligible for consideration in the formula.
Therefore, refund amount shall be = (500/1200 * 68) - 25= 3.33 Lakhs
 
Considering the present situation, refund amounting to Rs. 3.33 Lakhs shall be granted to the taxpayers subject to the balance available in the electronic credit ledger. However, in case proposed formula is taken into consideration, following shall be calculation of refund amount:
The ratio of input and input services for payment of output tax is 68:86.
Therefore, maximum Refund Amt = (500/1200*68) – (25 * 68/86) = 8.56 Lakhs
 
From the above computation, it is crystal clear that refund sanctioned in the old formula is Rs. 3.33 Lakhs, which is lesser as compared to the amended formula being Rs. 8.56 Lakhs; which is a welcoming initiative from the government.
It is pertinent to mention here that the recent decision taken by the GST Council in the 47th meeting convened on 28th and 29th June as regards to change in formula for calculation of refund is a ray of hope for the taxpayers wherein the taxpayers will get more refund as compared to earlier designed formula. However, the next question prevailing in the minds of taxpayers will be whether the proposed change shall be applicable retrospectively or prospectively. Let’s wait for the notification to be issued in this case so that more clarity can be obtained by the taxpayers.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com