Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 227 on recommendations of 47th GST Council meeting

GST Update No 227 on recommendations of 47th GST Council meeting
On 28th and 29th June 2022, 47th Council meeting was held under the chairmanship of Hon’ble Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman. A lot of changes in GST rates on supply of goods and services and provisions have been notified under the GST Law. The recommendations of the Council will be effective from the date of issuance of notifications in this regard. The highlights of the meeting are being summarized in the present update.
The key take aways of the GST Council meeting are as follows: -
1.       Waiver of mandatory requirement of taking registration under Section 24 of CGST Act, 2017 in case of supplies made through ECO: The GST council waived the requirement of taking compulsory registration under Section 24 of CGST Act, 2017 in case of supplies made through Electronic Commerce Operator [ECO]. The conditional waiver is subject to restrictions that the aggregate turnover computed on all India basis should not exceed the threshold limits as defined under Section 22 of CGST Act, 2017. Furthermore, it is prescribed that person should not be engaged in making inter-state outward taxable supply of goods. It seems that conditions imposing restriction on making inter-state outward supply is absurd and arbitrary which should be reconsidered since the ideology behind implementation of GST related to “One nation one tax” will not sustain.
 
2.       Composition taxpayers would be allowed to make intra-state supply through ECO: The GST Council will release a detailed scheme worked by Law Committee of the Council which would be effective from 01.01.2023. The above decision is in line with Government’s agenda in respect of facilitating E-commerce and boosting up the concept of Digital India. The change will invite more players in the market to route their transaction through E-Commerce platforms.
 
3.       Amendment in formula prescribed under Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules, 2017: In the recent GST Council meeting, it is decided to change the formula for calculation of refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit on account of inverted tax structure. It is thereby deliberated to consider amount of input tax credit in respect of input and input services for discharging output tax liability in case of inverted tax structure in the same ratio in which input tax credit is availed during the said tax period. This change is in line with the recent pronouncement of Apex Court in the case of Union of India & Others V/s V.K.C. Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. wherein it was held that it is beyond the scope of Hon’ble Supreme Court to redesign the formula related to claiming refund of inverted tax structure. However, looking at the anomalies, SC urged the GST Council to reconsider the formula.
 
4.       Amendment in CGST Rules for handling of pending IGST refund claims: After considering the current scenario of risky exporters wherein they were required to get their documents verified failing which refund claims of goods would get suspended/withheld, the GST Council recommended to provide transmission of IGST refund claims to the Jurisdictional GST Authorities to get them processed. This facility shall be routed on common portal electronically through Form GST RFD-01. In our opinion, instead of simplifying the process, the cumbersomeness in the process will increase since the GST authorities will now demand in-depth and detailed information considering L1 and L2 suppliers as well. This will further, increase the hardships of the exporters. 
 
5.       Re-credit of amount in credit ledger: It is decided that in case of erroneous refund sanctioned to the taxpayers on account of accumulated input tax credit or zero rated supply, amount shall be re-credited back to his account on the condition that the same is deposited along with interest and penalty. This facility is introduced which can be enabled by filing Form GST PMT-03 which will prove to be beneficial for taxpayers. 
 
6.       Introduction of Section 110 and 111 clause (c) of Finance Act, 2022: The Council has decided to prescribe rules for establishing manner of calculation of interest which is to be calculated as per retrospective amendment under Section 50 (3) of CGST Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.07.2017 wherein it is prescribed that interest will be payable on wrong availment and utilization of input tax credit. Furthermore, amendment under Section 49(10) of CGST Ac, 2017 regarding transfer of   balance available in cash ledger of a registered person to cash ledger of distinct person is also taken into consideration. It is decided to frame out rules in this respect so that liquidity and cash flows of the taxpayers can be managed efficiently.
 
7.       Waiver of late fee for delay in filing GSTR-4 for FY 2021-22 and extension of due date of CMP-08 for Quarter-I of FY 2022-23: It has been decided by the Council to extend the waiver of late fee u/s 47 of the GST Act related to delay in filing of GSTR-4 for FY 2021-22 for a period of 4 weeks i.e. till 28.07.2022. Further, it is also decided to extend due dates of filing CMP-08 for 1st quarter of FY 2022-23 from 18.07.2022 to 31.07.2022. Moreover, GSTN is also directed to resolve the issues related to negative balance displayed in credit ledger.
 
8.       Exemption of IGST on import of goods under AA/EPCG/EOU to continue and E-wallet scheme not to be continued further: It is agreed to continue exemptions of IGST available on import of goods under Advance Authorization/ EPCG/ Export oriented Unit. Further, to recollect, earlier it was proposed to have an e-wallet for every exporter which would be credited with notional or virtual currency by the DGFT based on the past record of exports. This facility would be used by exporters so that liquidity can be maintained and funds do not remain blocked. However, this facility will be discontinued in future.
 
9.       Provision for automatic revocation of suspension of registration: It is decided in the GST Council meeting that in case suspension of registration is done by system as per Rule 21A(2A) of CGST Rules, 2017 for violation of Section 29(2)(b)/(c) of CGST Act,2017, there would be automatic revocation once all pending returns are duly filed by the taxpayer. Therefore, the above relaxation is provided only in case of suspension of registration and not in case of cancellation of registration. Hence, in case registration is cancelled suo-moto by the proper officer, revocation of registration would be effective in accordance with provisions of Section 30 of CGST Act, 2017. The taxpayer will have to apply for revocation of registration within a period of 30 days which can be extended further by Additional/Joint Commissioner for a period not exceeding 30 days and further by the Commissioner for a period not exceeding 30 days on sufficient cause being shown. This can be exercised only after filing of all pending returns.
 
10.  Time period from 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 to be excluded in calculation of filing refund claim: It is clarified that for the purpose of filing of refund claim in accordance with provisions of Section 54 and 55 of CGST Act and for the purpose of issuance of demand as regards erroneous refunds under Section 73 of CGST Act, 2017, the above said period shall be excluded. This is done in alignment with various Judicial Pronouncements. To illustrate, Madras High Court in the case of M/s GNC Infra LLP V/s Assistant Commissioner (Circle) and Bombay High Court in case of Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Pvt. Ltd. has held that Suo-Moto Extension of limitation period delivered by Apex Court’s vide Miscellaneous Application No. 21 of 2022 would be applicable in case of refund application as well. Furthermore, it is decided that limitation under Section 73 pertaining to FY 2017-18 related to issuance of order in respect of other demands linked with annual return is extended till 30.09.2023.
 
11.  GST rate supply by ice cream parlour: There had been various disputes regarding levy of GST rates on supply of ice-cream by ice cream parlour. In this respect, it is clarified that GST at the rate of 5% can be charged without ITC during the period from 01.07.2017 to 05.10.2021. This is regularized by the GST Council to put an end to unnecessary and unwanted litigations.
 
12.  Sale of land after leveling, laying down of drainage lines: The GST council in its recent meeting decided that in case land is sold out after leveling and laying down of drainage lines, no GST shall be attracted on the leveling services. This is decided to put an end to confusion created by way of adverse Advance rulings being delivered on this issue. Further, it is in alignment with the concept of composite supply as defined under Section 8 of CGST Act, 2017 since the principal supply of sale of land is out of purview of GST as prescribed under Schedule III of CGST Act, 2017.
 
13.  Goods transport agency (GTA) is being given option to pay GST at 5% or 12% under forward charge:- The option is required to be exercised at the beginning of the financial year. RCM option is to continue.
 
14.  Following exemptions are also withdrawn:
 
·          Renting of residential dwelling provided to registered business entities. This is against the present exemption which is based on the use of dwelling rather than the service recipient.
·          Storage and warehousing of commodities which attracts levy of tax such as nuts, spices, jaggery etc.
·          Fumigation in warehouse of agriculture produce
·          Hotel accommodation which are priced upto Rs. 1000/day shall be chargeable at the rate of 12%.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com