Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 226 on tax implication on supply of food and accommodation to students

GST Update No 226 on tax implication on supply of food and accommodation to students
Although, the advent of GST has brought a paradigm shift in the sector of Indirect Taxation, the question regarding applicability of GST on education sector is a matter of grave concern for all. However, the legislation has retained the concept of “bundled services” from erstwhile GST regime, the question related to supply of food and accommodation services provided to students is a matter of discussion till date. On similar lines, one of the cases was reported before Telangana AAR in the case of M/S HEALERSARK RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED. The decision imparted in this case is the subject matter of our present update.
 
The applicant is engaged in the business of providing boarding and lodging to the students who are undergoing training under healthcare related vocational programs. Following question in this respect were raised before AAR:
1.     Applicability of GST SAC and GST Rate on above stated supply of service
2.     Whether it is a composite supply or mixed supply?
3.     Whether the service is exempted vide Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
 
The applicant submitted that they are charging Rs. 9000/- per candidate per month for lodging and boarding services provided to students who are undergoing training under vocational program out of which Rs. 3,500/- is towards rent and Rs. 5,500/- is for food on basis of head count. It was further submitted that they are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 since the value of supply of accommodation is below Rs. 1,000/- per day. It was contended that Rs. 9,000/- is charged per month which amounts to Rs.300/- per day and be treated as composite supply. Further, it was argued that since the supply of food will be ancillary and accommodation is principal supply, service would be exempted being a composite supply.
 
The AAR placed reliance on the decision of Apex Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma V/s Smt. Raj Kumar Sharma- AIR 1996 SC 869, wherein concept of composite supply was explained. Further, looking onto the facts, it was held that rent is fixed at the rate of Rs. 3,500/- whereas food is charged at Rs. 5,500/- as per the head count. This demonstrates that the price is variable to the extent of food supplied. No single price is charged from the customer no matter how much of the package is actually received. Hence, the above two supplies are integral part of one another. Reference was drawn to the decision of Kerala High Court in the case of Abott Health Care Pvt. Ltd. wherein it was held that the two supplies are composite supply since they are affected on “as is where is” basis. In the present scenario the conditions are not fulfilled and hence, the supplies are distinct supply. Therefore, it was clarified that the two supplies are distinct supplies wherein supply of accommodation is exempt and on supply of food, GST is leviable.
 
It is pertinent to mention here that there are divergent rulings and views delivered on the subject matter under consideration. To illustrate, Rajasthan AAAR in the case of M/s Mody Education Foundation wherein it was held that supply of food along with hostel accommodation service is not naturally bundled and therefore, be treated as mixed supply and chargeable to highest rate of tax. Similarly, in the case of M/s Sarj Educational Centre, West Bengal AAAR upheld the same view-point, treating it as mixed supply. Although, it is well settled law in law that the advance rulings are binding only on the assessees who sought it, yet these contradictory rulings lay down a foundation for the revenue department to initiate action against the assessees. The need of the hour is that consistency is maintained while pronouncing advance rulings so that unwarranted confusion could be avoided.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com