Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update No 200 on Pre-consultation show cause notice cannot be waived

GST update No 200 on Pre-consultation show cause notice cannot be waived

Show cause notice lays down the foundation of on the basis of which the adjudication proceedings are carried out and disputes are adjudicated. Time and again the Courts are flooded with plethora of cases wherein the orders of lower authorities were set aside on the ground of vaguely issued show cause notices. The intend of the Court behind this action is to ensure that the assessees are not subject to rigors of penalty provisions. Furthermore, the Board has made it mandatory to issue pre-consultation notices to the assessees wherein the amount of demand involved is above Rs. 50 Lakhs. However, it seems that the revenue authorities have filed to adopt this practice. On the similar grounds, the case travelled up to Delhi High Court in the case of M/s Gulati Enterprises V/s Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Ors. The decision imparted in this respect is subject matter of present update.

 

The petitioner was issued a show cause notice alleging that there was clandestine supply of goods and therefore, tax along with penalty was demanded from the assessee. The Counsel of the petitioner argued that the show cause notice is improper on the grounds of non-issuance of pre-consultation show cause notice as per Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017. It was further argued that after introduction of GST Act, the revenue authorities mandatorily had to issue pre consultation show cause notice. Further, it was contended that on perusal of GST DRC-01A, the revenue authorities had to crystalise the amount of tax and cess component along with the period to which it pertains to and the grounds on the basis of which penalty is fastened. Unfortunately, in the present case no such pre-consultation notice was issued to the assessee.

 

The Counsel of revenue argued that when the impugned show cause notice was issued, the statutory form i.e. GST-DRC 01A was not available on the portal and therefore, it was not issued to the assessee. Further, it was argued that the authorised signatory of the petitioner gave a voluntary statement before the concerned officer which obviated the need of issuance of pre-consultation show cause notice.

 

The Court analysed the case and placed referred to the decision passed by Bench of this Court in the case of Back Office IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.- W.P. No. 5766/2019. Further, reference was made to Master Circular of Board dated 10.03.2017 in this regard. The Court held that the requirement of issuance of show cause notice is mandatory and there are no exceptions to the same. Further, it was stated that before amendment, as per Rule 142(1A) of CGST Rules, 2017, the word “Shall” depicting compulsory requirement of issuing pre-consultation show cause notice was replaced with “may” with effect from 15.10.2020. However, it was held that the impact of this amendment shall not apply to present case since the show cause notice was issued prior to 21.05.2020. It was further held that the arguments as laid down by revenue are not appropriate since the revenue authorities should have issued a manual form in case the form was not available on the web portal. Further, it was held that a voluntary statement cannot substitute the statutory notice. Reliance was placed on the decision of another Bench of the Court in the case of Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/s Union of India & Ors. [W.P. No. 12653/2019]. Therefore, it was held that the revenue has grossly erred in performing its functions.

 

The above decision is a favouring the decision imparted in uniformity with the decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of M/s Dharamshil Agencies V/s Union of India. Time and again the Judiciary has back-to-back quashed various notices on the grounds of improper issuance of notices which demonstrates the fact that there is zero tolerance of non-compliance of instructions issued by department itself. On the Contrary, even if the contention of revenue is accepted regarding aforesaid amendment i.e it is discretionary to issued pre-consultation show cause notice, then also the departmental authorities should interpret the word “may” as “akin to shall” and thereby issue pre-consultation show cause notices to be on a safer side. However, it is quite disheartening that the lower authorities are not discharging their duties appropriately failing which will increases the instances of unnecessary litigations manifolds and further leads to wastage of time of the department and assessees.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com