Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 173 on glitches in transfer of credit to new unit

GST Update No 173 on glitches in transfer of credit to new unit
With the advent of GST, major
compliances have been digitised but
technology has its own disadvantages
too. It is often observed that the
amendments made in the GST Law is
not implemented on the GST portal
which leads to delay in grant of
benefits to the taxpayers. It is very
common that the utilities needed to
operationalise the provisions is not
updated timely on the GST portal due
to which assessees have to suffer and
knock the doors of High Court. The
present update seeks to discuss the
decision delivered by Rajasthan High
Court in the case of PACIFIC
INDUSTRIES LTD V/S UNION OF INDIA
wherein the benefit of transfer of
credit was being denied for non-filing
of FORM GST ITC-02A which was
actually not available on the GST portal.
The analysis of this decision is the
subject matter of discussion of our
present update.
The petitioner is a registered dealer
having industrial units in Udaipur. It
was contended that after the
amendment dated 01.02.2019,
separate registrations as per different
locations of business were allowed and
therefore, separate tax liability and
input credit was calculated for each
unit. Furthermore, Rule 41A was also
introduced vide notification dated
29.01.2019 which prescribes transfer of
unutilised Input credit to other unit
within the same state of the assessee.
Therefore, Form GST ITC-02A came into
existence. The petitioner raised
grievance that since Form GST ITC-02A
was not available on the portal, they
were not given an opportunity of
transferring Input Tax Credit. The
petitioner uploaded manual copy and
submitted it to the Jurisdictional
Department. It was contended that
immense financial difficulty was being
faced due to non-transfer of the credit
balance to the electronic credit ledger
of the petitioner. The petitioner stated
that grievance was raised with the
helpdesk in response of which a
tutorial link was generated. However,
the link was regarding filing form ITC-02
and not ITC-02A. Later on, another
letter was submitted to the
commissioner regarding the same issue
but no response was received thereto.
The Counsel for the department
contended that the petitioner failed to
furnish Form GST ITC-02A within 30
days from date of newly registered unit
CA. PRADEEP JAIN
??www.capradeepjain.com??pradeep@capradeepjain.com??5
and so they cannot transfer the credit
to the new unit.
The court held that the facts of the
case clearly showcases that the
petitioner was deprived of the
opportunity of furnishing Form GST ITC02A. Further, the petitioner diligently
completed his duty of informing the
same to the GST help desk by lodging a
grievance regarding the same.
Consequently, it was held that the
petitioner shall be allowed to avail
input tax credit in the GSTR-3B filed for
the next month.
The above decision is a welcoming
decision wherein the Hon’ble High
Court condoned non-filing of FORM
GST ITC-02A for transfer of credit to the
new unit on account of technical glitch
on the GST portal. The High Court has
upheld the established fact that input
credit which is legitimately earned by
the taxpayers should not be denied
merely because of procedural lapses or
due to technical glitches which
subsequently results in liquidity
constraints to the taxpayers. Reference
can be made to following decisions:
• EZZY ELECTRICALS V/S STATE OF
GUJRAT
• MEHAR TEX V. THE
COMMISSIONER OF CGST &
ORS. [W.P.(MD) NOS. 22996,
22999 & 23001 OF 2019 AND
W.M.P.(MD) NOS. 19733, 19736
& 19739 OF 2019 DATED 18
MARCH 2021]
It is hoped that the technical lapses on
account of non-updation of the GST
portal is being observed leniently by
the departmental authorities so that
unwarranted litigations can be avoided.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com