Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 172 ON COMPLICATED RE-STRUCTURING OF RATES FOR FLY ASH BRICKS

GST UPDATE No 172 ON COMPLICATED RE-STRUCTURING OF RATES FOR FLY ASH BRICKS
Recently, a couple of notifications have been issued with respect to change in GST rate of fly ash bricks along with change in composition scheme notification which has led to confusion as regards the alternatives available to the suppliers of fly ash bricks. It is being reported that the GST rate of 6% without input tax credit facility is under special composition scheme but in-depth analysis of the notifications reveals an entirely different picture. The interpretation of the amendments made for change in rate of fly ash bricks is the point of discussion of our present update. Before proceeding to the analytical portion, the relevant notifications are briefly summarised as follows:- NOTIFICATION NUMBER DATE SUBJECT MATTER 04/2022- Central Tax 31.03.2022 This notification seeks to amend notification no. 14/2019-Central Tax dated 07.03.2019 wherein the threshold limit for availing composition scheme benefit under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 was extended to Rs. 1.5 Crores. This notification debars the manufacturers of fly ash bricks from availing the benefit of composition scheme thereby meaning that only traders can opt for composition scheme. It is worth mentioning here that the principal notification no. 14/2019-Central Tax dated 07.03.2019 prescribes that tax shall be payable as stated in Rule 7 of the CGST Rules, 2017 which is 1% of the turnover of CA. PRADEEP JAIN ??www.capradeepjain.com??pradeep@capradeepjain.com??4 taxable supplies of goods and services in the State or Union Territory. 03/2022- Central Tax 31.03.2022 This notification seeks to amend notification no. 10/2019-Central Tax dated 07.03.2019 wherein exemption has been granted to any person engaged in exclusive supply of goods and whose aggregate turnover in the financial year does not exceeds Rs. 40 Lakhs. This notification provides exception wherein the enhanced threshold of Rs. 40 Lakhs will not be applicable for goods such as fly ash bricks. Hence, it indicates that the general threshold exemption of Rs. 20 Lakhs would be applicable for the suppliers of fly ash bricks. 01/2022- Central Tax (Rate) and 01/2022- Integrated Tax (Rate) 31.03.2022 This notification seeks to delete the entries of fly ash bricks from Schedule-I prescribing CGST rate of 2.5% and insert the said entries in Schedule-II prescribing CGST rate of 6%. The above rates have been prescribed taking into account the fact that input tax credit would be admissible to the supplier and recipient of such goods. 02/2022- Central Tax (Rate) and 02/2022- Integrated Tax (Rate) 31.03.2022 This notification seeks to prescribe the CGST rate of 3% with the condition that credit of input tax charged on goods or services used exclusively in supplying such goods has not been taken. Moreover, such goods are to be considered as exempt supply attracting the provisions of credit reversal as contained in section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. The key points of analysis of the above notifications are as follows:- CA. PRADEEP JAIN ??www.capradeepjain.com??pradeep@capradeepjain.com??5 1. Whether supplier of goods has the option to avail either of the rate notification? It is submitted that the notification no. 01/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 seeks to amend the rate notification prescribing various Schedules of GST rates. Furthermore, notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 is an exemption notification prescribing concessional GST rate of 6% with the condition of non-availment of ITC. In our opinion, the supplier has option to avail either of the notifications and there is no compulsion as regards applicability of particular notification. Furthermore, it is reiterated that the notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 is not a notification issued under the special composition scheme. This is for the reason that one of the major conditions for availing the benefit of composition scheme is that the supplier cannot make inter state supply of goods whereas it is worth noting that the notification prescribing GST rate of 6% without input tax credit facility has also been issued in Integrated Tax (Rate) section which proves that the notification is not for special composition scheme. Apart from above, it is submitted that composition scheme prescribes the rate of GST as a percentage of turnover whereas the notification no. 02/2022- Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 does not prescribe the GST rate as a percentage of turnover thereby meaning that it is not composition scheme notification. It is further submitted that although the notification is issued under section 11(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, it is not mandatory for the supplier to compulsorily opt for the exemption benefit because as per the explanation contained in section 11(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, where an exemption in respect of any goods or services or both from the whole or part of the tax leviable thereon has been granted absolutely, the registered person supplying such goods or services or both shall not collect the tax, in excess of the effective rate, on such supply of goods or services or both. It is worth mentioning that the notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 grants conditional exemption subject to fulfillment of the condition of non-availment of input tax credit. Consequently, the supplier has option to avail either of the rate notifications. CA. PRADEEP JAIN ??www.capradeepjain.com??pradeep@capradeepjain.com??6 2. Whether notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 is to be considered as special composition scheme or not? As per the analysis detailed in point no. 1, notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 is an exemption notification prescribing concessional GST rate of 6% subject to fulfillment of condition of non-availment of input tax credit. Therefore, it is not to be treated as notification issued under special composition scheme. 3. Whether accumulated input tax credit can be utilised by the supplier opting for GST rate of 3% without ITC facility? It is submitted that the notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 prescribes that the benefit of 6% GST would be available only when the credit of input tax charged on goods or services used exclusively in supplying such goods has not been taken thereby meaning that there is no embargo in utilising the accumulated balance of input tax credit in discharging output tax liability by the supplier of goods. In this respect, reliance may be placed on judicial pronouncements rendered in erstwhile regime that have held that credit legitimately earned by the assessee cannot be lapsed. The decisions along with their citations are referred as follows:- • EICHER MOTORS LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [1999 (106) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)] • SHANKESHWAR FABRICS (P) LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [2009 (248) E.L.T. 106 (RAJ.)]- It was held that even after opting under the compounded levy scheme, the petitioner is entitled to utilise credit on goods manufactured prior to 10.12.1998 under notification no. 36/1998-CE as right recognised cannot be extinguished. • SHABNAM PETROFILS PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [2019 (29) G.S.T.L. 225 (GUJ.)]- It was held that notification no. 20/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018 stating that accumulated input tax credit on specified fabrics lying unutilised in balance after payment of tax for and upto the month of July, 2018 shall lapse is ultra vires and beyond the scope of section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017. CA. PRADEEP JAIN ??www.capradeepjain.com??pradeep@capradeepjain.com??7 Hence, in view of the above cited decisions, there is no restriction in utilizing the unutilised balance of input tax credit by the suppliers opting for GST rate of 6% with the condition of non-availment of ITC. Aggregate Turnover (in Rs.) Exemption from taking GST registration Composition Scheme Whether GST can be charged from recipient? Rate of Tax Whether ITC available to the supplier? Whether ITC available to the recipient? Trader/Manu facturer having turnover Upto Rs. 20 Lakhs Yes __ __ __ __ __ Trader having turnover as 20 Lakhs to 1.5 Crores No Yes No CGST = 0.5% SGST= 0.5% No No Trader having turnover above Rs. 1.5 Crores No No If rate of CGST is opted as 3%-Yes. If rate of CGST is opted as CGST =3% SGST= 3% CGST =6% SGST= No Yes Yes, subject to provisions contained in section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. CA. PRADEEP JAIN ??www.capradeepjain.com??pradeep@capradeepjain.com??8 4. What difference does it make if the notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 is considered as exemption notification and not notification for composition scheme? It is submitted that if the notification no. 02/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.03.2022 is considered as exemption notification, the difference will be that GST can be charged from the recipient of goods but when benefit of composition scheme is availed, no GST can be charged from the recipient of goods. The only probable reason for treating the said notification as special composition scheme by the department can be to deny the benefit of inverted duty structure. However, it is worth mentioning that the question of claiming refund of accumulated input tax credit on account of inverted duty structure does not arise when GST rate of 6% without ITC is opted for. Moreover, if the supplier opts for GST rate of 12% with ITC facility, refund of accumulated input tax credit can be claimed by them as cement used with fly ash bricks attracts GST rate of 28%. Hence, the myth to consider the notification as issued under special composition scheme is not understandable. 5. Total alternatives available to the supplier of such goods:- We hereby summarise the total alternatives available to the supplier of fly ash bricks in view of the amendments made as stated above:- The above analysis clearly reveals the complexity in interpreting the amendment made with respect to change in rate of fly ash brick. It is hoped that the government resorts to easy amendment policies so that the motive of simple and easy tax reform is accomplished.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com