Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 165 on GST payable on hostel services

GST Update No 165 on GST payable on hostel services
Levying of tax on the educational sector is a delicate but an important concern because, education is not just a business, but more of a social task which polishes our future generation. Government plays an important role by providing free and compulsory elementary education to every child. With the passage of time, commercialization of education has increased tremendously wherein the industry is moving towards earning high profits. Amid all this chaos, to maintain a symmetry, GST Act has kept core educational services provided/ received by the educational institutions out of tax bracket by virtue of Exemption Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 while other services are taxable at 18%. One issue linked to the subject line was raised in front of Rajasthan AAR in the case of M/s Mody Education Foundation wherein the advance ruling was sought as regards to GST liability in the case of hostel services provided. The decision imparted in the said case is subject matter of our present update. The applicant (MEF) is registered as a Society under Societies Registration Act, 1860. It is established as an educational institution engaged in providing various services to the students. It is running a CBSE affiliated school from class 3rd to 12th . There is one more entity Mody University of Science & Technology (MUST) which provides educational services to its students. Since, MEF was having surplus infrastructure facility, the same is let out to MUST and rent collected in this respect is chargeable at 18% GST. MUST is collecting hostel fee from its students which includes lodging, boarding and serving food in the hall and is exempt under GST under Entry No. 66 of Notification No. 12/2017. MEF shall collect charges from students directly amounting to less than Rs. 1000/- per day. MEF is of the opinion that hostel facility charges are exempt from GST vide Entry 14 of Notification No. 12/2017. Reference was made to Circular No. 32/06/2018-GST dated 12.02.2018. The applicant contended that since the above entry of providing lodging, boarding and food facility along with hostel facility is covered under ambit of composite supply and stands exempted since the principal supply is exempted. It was argued that the said services belong to SAC Group 9963 and therefore, stands exempted vide Entry 14 of Notification No. 12/2017. However, services supplied independently to the clients do not belong to the said Group and hence, are liable to tax at applicable rates. Reliance was placed on decision of Karnataka AAR in the case of Re Srisal Luxurious Stay LLP 2020 (36) G.S.T.L.462. The AAR analyzed and examined the provisions of GST Act. It was analyzed that it falls withing the definition of supply as per Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017. It was clarified that since no mention of number of students will stay in room is declared by the applicant therefore, there is no clarity of tariff value of a unit of accommodation, GST rates as per Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 shall be applicable. Concluding the above, it was held that since ingredients of composite supply do not exist as there the said supplies are not naturally bundled, the above supply will be mixed supply and consequently, chargeable at the highest rate of tax. Reliance made by the petitioner on M/s. Srisai Luxurious Stay LLP., Karnataka vide Advance Ruling No. KKR ADRG 20/2020, dated 31.03.2020], M/s Logic Management Training Institutes Pvt. Ltd. Kerla vide Advance Ruling No. KER/76/2019, dated 20.05.2020 was rejected on the basis that the facts of the above cases are different from the present case. The above subject matter has been a mater of discussion since long. The Courts and AAR are flooded with the said cases wherein clarification is sought by the applicant on the above subject matter. To illustrate in the case of Resonance Eduventures Limited, Rajasthan AAR held that supply of coaching services along with printed material, test papers, unforms etc. amounts to mixed supply and therefore, chargeable at highest rate of tax. However, there are various divergent views on the same which are disheartening for the taxpayers. To quote, recently, Karnataka AAR in the case of Ghodawat Eduserve LLP (GSTARA 72/2019-20/B-51) stated that no GST shall be leviable on hostel accommodation since it is only residential dwelling and there is no other supply and hence, it is covered under Entry No. 14 of Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017. It is worth mentioning over here that although the advance rulings are binding on the applicant who sought the same, yet, looking at the present scenario, clarification from Government is this regard will be highly appreciated.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com