Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 165 on GST payable on hostel services

GST Update No 165 on GST payable on hostel services
Levying of tax on the educational sector is a delicate but an important concern because, education is not just a business, but more of a social task which polishes our future generation. Government plays an important role by providing free and compulsory elementary education to every child. With the passage of time, commercialization of education has increased tremendously wherein the industry is moving towards earning high profits. Amid all this chaos, to maintain a symmetry, GST Act has kept core educational services provided/ received by the educational institutions out of tax bracket by virtue of Exemption Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 while other services are taxable at 18%. One issue linked to the subject line was raised in front of Rajasthan AAR in the case of M/s Mody Education Foundation wherein the advance ruling was sought as regards to GST liability in the case of hostel services provided. The decision imparted in the said case is subject matter of our present update. The applicant (MEF) is registered as a Society under Societies Registration Act, 1860. It is established as an educational institution engaged in providing various services to the students. It is running a CBSE affiliated school from class 3rd to 12th . There is one more entity Mody University of Science & Technology (MUST) which provides educational services to its students. Since, MEF was having surplus infrastructure facility, the same is let out to MUST and rent collected in this respect is chargeable at 18% GST. MUST is collecting hostel fee from its students which includes lodging, boarding and serving food in the hall and is exempt under GST under Entry No. 66 of Notification No. 12/2017. MEF shall collect charges from students directly amounting to less than Rs. 1000/- per day. MEF is of the opinion that hostel facility charges are exempt from GST vide Entry 14 of Notification No. 12/2017. Reference was made to Circular No. 32/06/2018-GST dated 12.02.2018. The applicant contended that since the above entry of providing lodging, boarding and food facility along with hostel facility is covered under ambit of composite supply and stands exempted since the principal supply is exempted. It was argued that the said services belong to SAC Group 9963 and therefore, stands exempted vide Entry 14 of Notification No. 12/2017. However, services supplied independently to the clients do not belong to the said Group and hence, are liable to tax at applicable rates. Reliance was placed on decision of Karnataka AAR in the case of Re Srisal Luxurious Stay LLP 2020 (36) G.S.T.L.462. The AAR analyzed and examined the provisions of GST Act. It was analyzed that it falls withing the definition of supply as per Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017. It was clarified that since no mention of number of students will stay in room is declared by the applicant therefore, there is no clarity of tariff value of a unit of accommodation, GST rates as per Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 shall be applicable. Concluding the above, it was held that since ingredients of composite supply do not exist as there the said supplies are not naturally bundled, the above supply will be mixed supply and consequently, chargeable at the highest rate of tax. Reliance made by the petitioner on M/s. Srisai Luxurious Stay LLP., Karnataka vide Advance Ruling No. KKR ADRG 20/2020, dated 31.03.2020], M/s Logic Management Training Institutes Pvt. Ltd. Kerla vide Advance Ruling No. KER/76/2019, dated 20.05.2020 was rejected on the basis that the facts of the above cases are different from the present case. The above subject matter has been a mater of discussion since long. The Courts and AAR are flooded with the said cases wherein clarification is sought by the applicant on the above subject matter. To illustrate in the case of Resonance Eduventures Limited, Rajasthan AAR held that supply of coaching services along with printed material, test papers, unforms etc. amounts to mixed supply and therefore, chargeable at highest rate of tax. However, there are various divergent views on the same which are disheartening for the taxpayers. To quote, recently, Karnataka AAR in the case of Ghodawat Eduserve LLP (GSTARA 72/2019-20/B-51) stated that no GST shall be leviable on hostel accommodation since it is only residential dwelling and there is no other supply and hence, it is covered under Entry No. 14 of Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017. It is worth mentioning over here that although the advance rulings are binding on the applicant who sought the same, yet, looking at the present scenario, clarification from Government is this regard will be highly appreciated.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com