Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 164 on technical glitches on common portal

GST Update No 164 on technical glitches on common portal
GST Update No 164 on technical glitches on common portal India’s largest tax reform, the Goods and Service tax, was launched on 1st July 2017, it is yet to be fully put in place, all thanks to patchy technical implementation. More than 4 years down the line and after multiple policy updates, it still seems that not everything unfolded smoothly and as planned. Consequently, the Government scrambles to fix these glitches, the GST system also has failed to support last minute filing of returns, resulting in extension of deadlines continuously. Similarly, the common portal fails to display various show cause notices and correspondences with the revenue department. One such issue on the same line was raised in front of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Pushpam Reality V/s State Tax Officer. The decision imparted is the subject matter of our present update. The petitioner filed a Writ Petition against assessment order seeking relief of Writ of Certiorari. The counsel of petitioner submitted that the impugned assessment orders were passed without proper show cause notice or giving adequate opportunity of hearing. Therefore, there was violation of principle of natural justice. The departmental representative argued that the notices were uploaded on the portal of the State Government and auto populated on the portal maintained by Central Government. Therefore, it was contended that submissions of petitioner are not tenable. Further, it was submitted that once notices are uploaded, information is available on the dashboard of the assessees. Moreover, departmental representative referred Section 169 of CGST Act, 2017 wherein it was held that notice served in any other manner is also sufficient. Reliance was placed on the decision of Kerala High Court in the case of Softouch Health Care Private Ltd. Vs. The State Tax Officer, 1st Circle, Department of State GST and Others. The Court analyzed Section 169 of CGST Act, 2017 and held that said section was sufficiently and duly complied with. It was stated that GST was implemented w.e.f. 01.07.2017. Since then, the portal is facing numerous problems on several occasions and accordingly, steps were also taken to fix these technical glitches. Till date the problems are arising on account of technical glitches out of inter communication between SGST and CGST. In such a scenario, it was finally ruled out that until and unless all the problems are resolved out, the revenue authorities may serve the notice of assessment and communications both through registered/ speed post along with acknowledgment and through web portal. Once all the problems are resolved, the practice of sending physical copy can be discontinued. The petitioner was directed to file a reply of show cause notice. And the respondents were directed to pass speaking order on merits within a period of 45 days from date of receipt of copy of this order. The above judgment is a favorable decision for the business community. With the advent of technology driven society, the business houses are constantly facing various challenges ranging from filing of returns to alignment of books and records to filing of replies of notices due to technical glitches on the portal. There had been plethora of judgments in the Court of Law in this regard. To illustrate in the case of M/s Bodal Chemicals Ltd. Versus Union Of India, Gujarat High Court held that department should allow filing of GSTR-6 and cannot raise hands in despair due to technical problems. The need of the hour is that the Government should fix these problems at the earliest possible resulting into a big boost of struggling business houses. Even the business community is also not so computer friendly. Moreover, the working of portal is also not known to taxpayers. We have come across a case where a big business house having good technical staff was not able to know that show cause notice was issued to them. This is due to the fac that notice was not uploaded in the section “Services”- “User Services”-“View Notices and Orders” but under “Services”- “User Services”- “View Additional Notices/Orders”. Now, taxpayer said that he was not knowing that show cause notice can either be uploaded in either of these two places in portal. He came to know about the same only after call from the department. Department was helpful in this instant case but it may proceed without communicating with taxpayer. Moreover, the small taxpayer do not see the e-mail id given in registration. Hence, Section 169 should be amended and physical copy of show cause notice should be made mandatory or at least there should be communication by way of mobile call should be made mandatory.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com