Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update No 160 on cancellation of registration without issuance of SCN

GST Update No 160 on cancellation of registration without issuance of SCN
The provision in GST law regarding cancellation of registration by the revenue authorities for non-filing of GST returns for continuous period of 6 months is draconian as GST registrations are cancelled even in cases where the assessee had filed belated returns. Moreover, it is observed that often the decision of cancellation of registration is taken without following the prescribed procedure such as issuance of show cause notice. It is well established principle of Law that the principle of natural justice is mandatorily required to be followed for passing a valid and legitimate order. The issue regarding cancellation of registration without considering the reply of the assessee was recently raised before the hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of LATIKA GHOSH VS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER. The decision imparted in this case is the subject matter of discussion of our present update. The petitioner filed a Writ Application and prayed for interim relief for restoration of certificate of registration and issuing Writ of Mandamus. The revenue authorities issued a show cause notice on 06.06.2018 wherein it was proposed to cancel the certificate of registration on the grounds that the petitioner have not filed returns for a continuous period of 6 months. However, the appellant filed their pending returns as soon as the notice was received along with payment of tax, late fee and interest. On 08.02.2021, revenue authorities cancelled the registration and reference was made to show cause notice dated 06.06.2018. The Counsel for the petitioner argued that a show cause notice dated 02.12.2019 was issued proposing cancellation of registration. To this, the petitioner argued that the said notice was never uploaded on the portal. Further, on 11.09.2021 departmental authorities issued show cause for rejection of revocation application of cancellation since appellant failed to pay late fee for the period from 2017 to 2021 along with interest. The petitioner submitted they had filed reply as on 12.09.2021. However, the application of revocation was rejected finally on 06.10.2021. The counsel of the department argued that order for cancellation of registration was passed on 06.10.2021 since no specific prayer was sought by the appellant in the writ application. The Court held that order for cancellation of registration passed on 08.02.2021, violated the principles of natural justice. Further, the contention raised by department as regards to the fact that no specific prayer was sought is incorrect. It was stated that the department did not indicate to the appellant as to how the computation of late fee and interest for the aforesaid period is incorrect. Therefore, the order of cancellation of registration is not tenable. The authorities were directed to restore the GST registration and issue a show cause notice to the petitioner in case of shortfall in payment of late fee. It is submitted that there have been numerous decisions rendered on the issue that registration cannot be cancelled in case of violation of principles of natural justice. Reference to the said judicial pronouncements is as follows:- • C.B. GAUTAM V/S UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS • TURRET INDUSTRIAL SECURITY PVT. LTD. V/S UNION OF INDIA • VIVAA TRADECOM PVT. LTD. V/S STATE OF GUJARAT • TATA STEEL BSL LTD. V/S UNION OF INDIAs It is submitted that in the garb of exercising the discretion to cancel registration on account of non-filing of returns by the assessee and not restoring the same, the revenue authorities are infact contributing to loss of revenue to the government. Time and again, the revenue authorities are directed to adhere to the principle of natural justice by passing order only after granting an opportunity of being heard to the taxpayers so that fair judgments can be imparted failing which it will result into abuse of power and harassment of the taxpayers.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com