Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 157 ON ITC ELIGIBILITY ON FREEBIES

GST UPDATE No 157 ON ITC ELIGIBILITY ON FREEBIES
The concept of “Input Tax Credit”, in Indirect Tax Reform has been introduced to eliminate the cascading effect and promote seamless flow of input tax credit throughout the transaction chain. However, it is not so easy to justify the availment of input tax credit on freebies. The revenue authorities are adamant while interpreting the provisions of input tax credit and consequently, refrain from giving input tax credit easily to the taxpayers. The present update seeks to discuss the issue of admissibility of input tax credit on freebies given by business for sales promotion. Quoting the recent judgment imparted by Apex Court in the case of M/S APEX LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. V/S DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the ruling that pharmaceutical companies are not entitled for deduction of expenses incurred on distribution of freebies/incentives to medical practitioners. The Hon’ble Court was of the view that the freebies ranging from gifts, fridges, chains, LCD TVs etc. are technically not “free”. Their cost is generally included in the prices of the drugs and therefore gearing the overall prices of the commodities. The above decision was rendered in the context of Income Tax Laws. However, if the analogy of the Apex Court judgment is enforced in the GST regime as well, it can cast a doubt on the applicability of provisions contained in section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act, 2017 wherein input credit is blocked in case goods are distributed as free samples or gifts. The revenue authorities are of the view that input credit on freebies shall stand blocked since goods disposed of as a freebie doesn’t attract any output tax. However, looking into the current scenarios, it is the common practice followed by almost all the business houses specially during festive seasons to distribute their products as free sample. The burning question that arises is whether freebie given by business can be considered as gift? Gifts in common parlance is anything given voluntary, without expecting anything in return, out of love and affection. The question that arises is will any company which runs business to earn profits, distribute goods to its dealers or customers out of love and affection? The answer is a big NO. Goods distributed to dealers and customers are indeed towards business purposes so as to promote and boost the sales resulting into overall business profitability. The underlying motive behind this act is nothing but furtherance of business. Had the situation been that the goods are distributed on a voluntary basis and without any business motive, it would have been useless to argue that ITC should be denied on these transactions. On the contrary, the present situation is far different as goods distributed are with the motive of sales promotion. There are plethora of Judicial pronouncements which have ruled in negative as regards availability of input tax credit on freebies. In the case of BIOSTADT INDIA LTD, Maharashtra AAR held that ITC is denied on distribution of gold coins by the company to its customers on achievement of targets. Further, in case of SANOFI (INDIA) LIMITED, AAR held that ITC was denied in case goods were distributed without any consideration to the customers on fulfillment of certain conditions. Furthermore, the AAR deny the input credit on the basis that since there is no written contract or agreement which existed between the parties. It is submitted that the views taken by AAR as stated above needs to be revisited in light of the Apex Court decision holding that freebies are part of the cost of the product. If such a view is being accepted in GST Laws too, goods distributed as free are infact part of the cost of product on which GST is being paid so technically, they are not free. Hence, one may argue that ITC cannot be denied if goods are distributed as free samples or as gifts to consumers or dealers in the ordinary course of business. The admissibility of input tax credit on freebies has been a matter of dispute since inception. A proper clarification favoring the taxpayers in this regard from the Government is anticipated by the business communities thus marking an end on the unwanted litigations on this issue.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com