Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 157 ON ITC ELIGIBILITY ON FREEBIES

GST UPDATE No 157 ON ITC ELIGIBILITY ON FREEBIES
The concept of “Input Tax Credit”, in Indirect Tax Reform has been introduced to eliminate the cascading effect and promote seamless flow of input tax credit throughout the transaction chain. However, it is not so easy to justify the availment of input tax credit on freebies. The revenue authorities are adamant while interpreting the provisions of input tax credit and consequently, refrain from giving input tax credit easily to the taxpayers. The present update seeks to discuss the issue of admissibility of input tax credit on freebies given by business for sales promotion. Quoting the recent judgment imparted by Apex Court in the case of M/S APEX LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. V/S DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the ruling that pharmaceutical companies are not entitled for deduction of expenses incurred on distribution of freebies/incentives to medical practitioners. The Hon’ble Court was of the view that the freebies ranging from gifts, fridges, chains, LCD TVs etc. are technically not “free”. Their cost is generally included in the prices of the drugs and therefore gearing the overall prices of the commodities. The above decision was rendered in the context of Income Tax Laws. However, if the analogy of the Apex Court judgment is enforced in the GST regime as well, it can cast a doubt on the applicability of provisions contained in section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act, 2017 wherein input credit is blocked in case goods are distributed as free samples or gifts. The revenue authorities are of the view that input credit on freebies shall stand blocked since goods disposed of as a freebie doesn’t attract any output tax. However, looking into the current scenarios, it is the common practice followed by almost all the business houses specially during festive seasons to distribute their products as free sample. The burning question that arises is whether freebie given by business can be considered as gift? Gifts in common parlance is anything given voluntary, without expecting anything in return, out of love and affection. The question that arises is will any company which runs business to earn profits, distribute goods to its dealers or customers out of love and affection? The answer is a big NO. Goods distributed to dealers and customers are indeed towards business purposes so as to promote and boost the sales resulting into overall business profitability. The underlying motive behind this act is nothing but furtherance of business. Had the situation been that the goods are distributed on a voluntary basis and without any business motive, it would have been useless to argue that ITC should be denied on these transactions. On the contrary, the present situation is far different as goods distributed are with the motive of sales promotion. There are plethora of Judicial pronouncements which have ruled in negative as regards availability of input tax credit on freebies. In the case of BIOSTADT INDIA LTD, Maharashtra AAR held that ITC is denied on distribution of gold coins by the company to its customers on achievement of targets. Further, in case of SANOFI (INDIA) LIMITED, AAR held that ITC was denied in case goods were distributed without any consideration to the customers on fulfillment of certain conditions. Furthermore, the AAR deny the input credit on the basis that since there is no written contract or agreement which existed between the parties. It is submitted that the views taken by AAR as stated above needs to be revisited in light of the Apex Court decision holding that freebies are part of the cost of the product. If such a view is being accepted in GST Laws too, goods distributed as free are infact part of the cost of product on which GST is being paid so technically, they are not free. Hence, one may argue that ITC cannot be denied if goods are distributed as free samples or as gifts to consumers or dealers in the ordinary course of business. The admissibility of input tax credit on freebies has been a matter of dispute since inception. A proper clarification favoring the taxpayers in this regard from the Government is anticipated by the business communities thus marking an end on the unwanted litigations on this issue.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com