Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE No 157 ON ITC ELIGIBILITY ON FREEBIES

GST UPDATE No 157 ON ITC ELIGIBILITY ON FREEBIES
The concept of “Input Tax Credit”, in Indirect Tax Reform has been introduced to eliminate the cascading effect and promote seamless flow of input tax credit throughout the transaction chain. However, it is not so easy to justify the availment of input tax credit on freebies. The revenue authorities are adamant while interpreting the provisions of input tax credit and consequently, refrain from giving input tax credit easily to the taxpayers. The present update seeks to discuss the issue of admissibility of input tax credit on freebies given by business for sales promotion. Quoting the recent judgment imparted by Apex Court in the case of M/S APEX LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. V/S DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the ruling that pharmaceutical companies are not entitled for deduction of expenses incurred on distribution of freebies/incentives to medical practitioners. The Hon’ble Court was of the view that the freebies ranging from gifts, fridges, chains, LCD TVs etc. are technically not “free”. Their cost is generally included in the prices of the drugs and therefore gearing the overall prices of the commodities. The above decision was rendered in the context of Income Tax Laws. However, if the analogy of the Apex Court judgment is enforced in the GST regime as well, it can cast a doubt on the applicability of provisions contained in section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act, 2017 wherein input credit is blocked in case goods are distributed as free samples or gifts. The revenue authorities are of the view that input credit on freebies shall stand blocked since goods disposed of as a freebie doesn’t attract any output tax. However, looking into the current scenarios, it is the common practice followed by almost all the business houses specially during festive seasons to distribute their products as free sample. The burning question that arises is whether freebie given by business can be considered as gift? Gifts in common parlance is anything given voluntary, without expecting anything in return, out of love and affection. The question that arises is will any company which runs business to earn profits, distribute goods to its dealers or customers out of love and affection? The answer is a big NO. Goods distributed to dealers and customers are indeed towards business purposes so as to promote and boost the sales resulting into overall business profitability. The underlying motive behind this act is nothing but furtherance of business. Had the situation been that the goods are distributed on a voluntary basis and without any business motive, it would have been useless to argue that ITC should be denied on these transactions. On the contrary, the present situation is far different as goods distributed are with the motive of sales promotion. There are plethora of Judicial pronouncements which have ruled in negative as regards availability of input tax credit on freebies. In the case of BIOSTADT INDIA LTD, Maharashtra AAR held that ITC is denied on distribution of gold coins by the company to its customers on achievement of targets. Further, in case of SANOFI (INDIA) LIMITED, AAR held that ITC was denied in case goods were distributed without any consideration to the customers on fulfillment of certain conditions. Furthermore, the AAR deny the input credit on the basis that since there is no written contract or agreement which existed between the parties. It is submitted that the views taken by AAR as stated above needs to be revisited in light of the Apex Court decision holding that freebies are part of the cost of the product. If such a view is being accepted in GST Laws too, goods distributed as free are infact part of the cost of product on which GST is being paid so technically, they are not free. Hence, one may argue that ITC cannot be denied if goods are distributed as free samples or as gifts to consumers or dealers in the ordinary course of business. The admissibility of input tax credit on freebies has been a matter of dispute since inception. A proper clarification favoring the taxpayers in this regard from the Government is anticipated by the business communities thus marking an end on the unwanted litigations on this issue.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com